355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29665243)
1. Creating virtual 3-dimensional models for teaching pre-clinical tooth preparation: Students' usages and perceptions.
Lin WS; Chou JC; Charette JR; Metz MJ; Harris BT; Choi N
Eur J Dent Educ; 2018 Aug; 22(3):e573-e581. PubMed ID: 29665243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity and User Experience in an Augmented Reality Virtual Tooth Identification Test.
Kim-Berman H; Karl E; Sherbel J; Sytek L; Ramaswamy V
J Dent Educ; 2019 Nov; 83(11):1345-1352. PubMed ID: 31406007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and Assessment of a Three-Dimensional Tooth Morphology Quiz for Dental Students.
Lone M; Vagg T; Theocharopoulos A; Cryan JF; Mckenna JP; Downer EJ; Toulouse A
Anat Sci Educ; 2019 May; 12(3):284-299. PubMed ID: 30378278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Faculty impressions of dental students' performance with and without virtual reality simulation.
Gottlieb R; Lanning SK; Gunsolley JC; Buchanan JA
J Dent Educ; 2011 Nov; 75(11):1443-51. PubMed ID: 22058393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of student's perceptions between 3D printed models versus series models in paediatric dentistry hands-on session.
Marty M; Broutin A; Vergnes JN; Vaysse F
Eur J Dent Educ; 2019 Feb; 23(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 30383320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of information and communication technology amongst New Zealand dental students.
Cox S; Pollock D; Rountree J; Murray CM
Eur J Dent Educ; 2016 Aug; 20(3):135-41. PubMed ID: 25891320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of pre-clinical instructional technologies: Natural teeth, 3D models, 3D printing, and augmented reality.
Mahrous A; Elgreatly A; Qian F; Schneider GB
J Dent Educ; 2021 Nov; 85(11):1795-1801. PubMed ID: 34216032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simulation training for ceramic crown preparation in the dental setting using a virtual educational system.
Liu L; Zhou R; Yuan S; Sun Z; Lu X; Li J; Chu F; Walmsley AD; Yan B; Wang L
Eur J Dent Educ; 2020 May; 24(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 31766075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the presentation of virtual histology slides by students during classes. Are there any differences in approach between dentistry and general medicine students?
Tauber Z; Cizkova K; Lichnovska R; Lacey H; Erdosova B; Zizka R; Kamarad V
Eur J Dent Educ; 2019 May; 23(2):119-126. PubMed ID: 30582772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimizing quality of dental carving by preclinical dental students through anatomy theory reinforcement.
de Azevedo RA; Correa MB; Torriani MA; Lund RG
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jul; 11(4):377-384. PubMed ID: 29156108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhancing Student Learning in Removable Partial Denture Design by Using Virtual Three-Dimensional Models Versus Traditional Two-Dimensional Drawings: A Comparative Study.
Mahrous A; Schneider GB; Holloway JA; Dawson DV
J Prosthodont; 2019 Oct; 28(8):927-933. PubMed ID: 31343801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Saudi dental students' perceptions of pediatric behavior guidance techniques.
Al-Jobair AM; Al-Mutairi MA
BMC Med Educ; 2015 Sep; 15():120. PubMed ID: 26354116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effectiveness of a 3D virtual tooth identification test as an assessment tool for a dental anatomy course.
Suh E; Karl E; Ramaswamy V; Kim-Berman H
Eur J Dent Educ; 2022 May; 26(2):232-238. PubMed ID: 33982377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the efficiency of the Dental Teacher system as a digital preclinical teaching tool.
Nagy ZA; Simon B; Tóth Z; Vág J
Eur J Dent Educ; 2018 Aug; 22(3):e619-e623. PubMed ID: 29797383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of digital scanning and polyvinyl siloxane impression techniques by dental students: instructional efficiency and attitudes towards technology.
Marti AM; Harris BT; Metz MJ; Morton D; Scarfe WC; Metz CJ; Lin WS
Eur J Dent Educ; 2017 Aug; 21(3):200-205. PubMed ID: 26960967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of Team-Based Learning and Traditional Instruction in Teaching Removable Partial Denture Concepts.
Echeto LF; Sposetti V; Childs G; Aguilar ML; Behar-Horenstein LS; Rueda L; Nimmo A
J Dent Educ; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1040-8. PubMed ID: 26329028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the use of a guided bur during preclinical teaching of tooth preparation: A pilot study.
Yee S; Richert R; Viguie G; Couraud S; Dehurtevent M; Fages M; Corne P; Ducret M
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2019 Dec; 5(6):588-593. PubMed ID: 31890295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combining virtual reality and 3D-printed models to simulate patient-specific dental operative procedures-A study exploring student perceptions.
Towers A; Dixon J; Field J; Martin R; Martin N
Eur J Dent Educ; 2022 May; 26(2):393-403. PubMed ID: 34498360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Students' perceptions of a blended learning experience in dental education.
Varthis S; Anderson OR
Eur J Dent Educ; 2018 Feb; 22(1):e35-e41. PubMed ID: 28019061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of virtual versus traditional education on theoretical knowledge and reporting skills of dental students in radiographic interpretation of bony lesions of the jaw.
Soltanimehr E; Bahrampour E; Imani MM; Rahimi F; Almasi B; Moattari M
BMC Med Educ; 2019 Jun; 19(1):233. PubMed ID: 31238927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
