170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29665309)
1. Association between operative technique and intrusive thoughts on health-related Quality of Life 3 years after APE/ELAPE for rectal cancer: results from a national Swedish cohort with comparison with normative Swedish data.
Prytz M; Ledebo A; Angenete E; Bock D; Haglind E
Cancer Med; 2018 Jun; 7(6):2727-2735. PubMed ID: 29665309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for rectal cancer--short-term results from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Selective use of ELAPE warranted.
Prytz M; Angenete E; Ekelund J; Haglind E
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 29(8):981-7. PubMed ID: 24950793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer--Extensive Surgery to Be Used With Discretion Based on 3-Year Local Recurrence Results: A Registry-based, Observational National Cohort Study.
Prytz M; Angenete E; Bock D; Haglind E
Ann Surg; 2016 Mar; 263(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 25906414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective case-control study of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of the rectum versus conventional laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal excision: comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and quality of life.
Vaughan-Shaw PG; Cheung T; Knight JS; Nichols PH; Pilkington SA; Mirnezami AH
Tech Coloproctol; 2012 Oct; 16(5):355-62. PubMed ID: 22777690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The LOREC APE registry: operative technique, oncological outcome and perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal excision.
Jones H; Moran B; Crane S; Hompes R; Cunningham C;
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Feb; 19(2):172-180. PubMed ID: 27321172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective controlled study of the safety and oncological outcomes of ELAPE procure with definitive anatomic landmarks versus conventional APE for lower rectal cancer.
Shen Z; Ye Y; Zhang X; Xie Q; Yin M; Yang X; Jiang K; Liang B; Wang S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 25659773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A meta-analysis of quality of life for abdominoperineal excision of rectum versus anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Cornish JA; Tilney HS; Heriot AG; Lavery IC; Fazio VW; Tekkis PP
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Jul; 14(7):2056-68. PubMed ID: 17431723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for low rectal cancer.
Stelzner S; Hellmich G; Sims A; Kittner T; Puffer E; Zimmer J; Bleyl D; Witzigmann H
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2016 Oct; 31(10):1729-37. PubMed ID: 27631643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
Perdawood SK; Lund T
Tech Coloproctol; 2015 Mar; 19(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 25384360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective study with long-term follow-up.
Carpelan A; Karvonen J; Varpe P; Rantala A; Kaljonen A; Grönroos J; Huhtinen H
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Apr; 33(4):375-381. PubMed ID: 29445870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abdominoperineal extralevator resection.
Prytz M; Angenete E; Haglind E
Dan Med J; 2012 Sep; 59(9):A4366. PubMed ID: 22951192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pretreatment quality of life in patients with rectal cancer is associated with intrusive thoughts and sense of coherence.
Asplund D; Bisgaard T; Bock D; Burcharth J; González E; Haglind E; Kolev Y; Matthiessen P; Rosander C; Rosenberg J; Smedh K; Sörensson MÅ; Angenete E
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Nov; 32(11):1639-1647. PubMed ID: 28913686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oncological and quality of life outcomes following extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
Kamali D; Sharpe A; Musbahi A; Reddy A
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2017 May; 99(5):402-409. PubMed ID: 28462642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Persistent perineal morbidity is common following abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
Asplund D; Prytz M; Bock D; Haglind E; Angenete E
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1563-70. PubMed ID: 26245948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Local control and survival after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for locally advanced or low rectal cancer.
Palmer G; Anderin C; Martling A; Holm T
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Jul; 16(7):527-32. PubMed ID: 24602235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The association between social support, intrusive thoughts, avoidance, and adjustment following an experimental cancer treatment.
Devine D; Parker PA; Fouladi RT; Cohen L
Psychooncology; 2003; 12(5):453-62. PubMed ID: 12833558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A controlled study on the efficacy and quality of life of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (ISR) and extralevator abdominoperineal resection (ELAPE) in the treatment of extremely low rectal cancer.
Yang W; Huang L; Chen P; Yang Y; Liu X; Wang C; Yu Y; Yang L; Wang Z; Zhou Z
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 May; 99(22):e20245. PubMed ID: 32481390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term quality of life in pouch patients compared with stoma patients following rectal cancer surgery.
Mrak K; Jagoditsch M; Eberl T; Klingler A; Tschmelitsch J
Colorectal Dis; 2011 Dec; 13(12):e403-10. PubMed ID: 21812896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extralevator abdominoperineal excision versus conventional surgery for low rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.
Neşşar G; Demirbağ AE; Celep B; Elbir OH; Kayaalp C
Ulus Cerrahi Derg; 2016; 32(4):244-247. PubMed ID: 28149119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicenter study of surgical and oncologic outcomes of extra-levator versus conventional abdominoperineal excision for lower rectal cancer.
Shen Z; Bu Z; Li A; Lu J; Zhu L; Chong CS; Gao Z; Jiang K; Wang S; Li F; Xiao Y; Ji J; Ye Y
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Jan; 46(1):115-122. PubMed ID: 31471089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
