These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29665420)

  • 1. Distortion-matched T
    van der Zwaag W; Buur PF; Fracasso A; van Doesum T; Uludağ K; Versluis MJ; Marques JP
    Neuroimage; 2018 Aug; 176():41-55. PubMed ID: 29665420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic cortical surface reconstruction of high-resolution T1 echo planar imaging data.
    Renvall V; Witzel T; Wald LL; Polimeni JR
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 134():338-354. PubMed ID: 27079529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examples of sub-millimeter, 7T, T
    van der Zwaag W; Buur PF; Fracasso A; van Doesum T; Uludağ K; Versluis M; Marques JP
    Data Brief; 2018 Oct; 20():415-418. PubMed ID: 30175207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetization transfer weighted EPI facilitates cortical depth determination in native fMRI space.
    Chai Y; Li L; Wang Y; Huber L; Poser BA; Duyn J; Bandettini PA
    Neuroimage; 2021 Nov; 242():118455. PubMed ID: 34364993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of undistorted images in brain echo-planar images with distortions using the conjugate gradient method with anatomical regularization.
    Kumazawa S; Yoshiura T
    Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7531-7544. PubMed ID: 35901497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reduced distortion artifact whole brain CBF mapping using blip-reversed non-segmented 3D echo planar imaging with pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling.
    Gai ND; Chou YY; Pham D; Butman JA
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 44():119-124. PubMed ID: 28867670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single-shot compensation of image distortions and BOLD contrast optimization using multi-echo EPI for real-time fMRI.
    Weiskopf N; Klose U; Birbaumer N; Mathiak K
    Neuroimage; 2005 Feb; 24(4):1068-79. PubMed ID: 15670684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Co-registration and distortion correction of diffusion and anatomical images based on inverse contrast normalization.
    Bhushan C; Haldar JP; Choi S; Joshi AA; Shattuck DW; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jul; 115():269-80. PubMed ID: 25827811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative Evaluations of Geometrical Distortion Corrections in Cortical Surface-Based Analysis of High-Resolution Functional MRI Data at 7T.
    Yamamoto T; Fukunaga M; Sugawara SK; Hamano YH; Sadato N
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Apr; 53(4):1220-1234. PubMed ID: 33151028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of acquisition and analysis strategies on cortical depth-dependent fMRI.
    Kashyap S; Ivanov D; Havlicek M; Poser BA; Uludağ K
    Neuroimage; 2018 Mar; 168():332-344. PubMed ID: 28506874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A study-specific fMRI normalization approach that operates directly on high resolution functional EPI data at 7 Tesla.
    Grabner G; Poser BA; Fujimoto K; Polimeni JR; Wald LL; Trattnig S; Toni I; Barth M
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():710-4. PubMed ID: 24973602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. STrategically Acquired Gradient Echo (STAGE) imaging, part I: Creating enhanced T1 contrast and standardized susceptibility weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Chen Y; Liu S; Wang Y; Kang Y; Haacke EM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():130-139. PubMed ID: 29056394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image distortion correction in fMRI: A quantitative evaluation.
    Hutton C; Bork A; Josephs O; Deichmann R; Ashburner J; Turner R
    Neuroimage; 2002 May; 16(1):217-40. PubMed ID: 11969330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mitigating susceptibility-induced distortions in high-resolution 3DEPI fMRI at 7T.
    Malekian V; Graedel NN; Hickling A; Aghaeifar A; Dymerska B; Corbin N; Josephs O; Maguire EA; Callaghan MF
    Neuroimage; 2023 Oct; 279():120294. PubMed ID: 37517572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative T1 mapping using multi-slice multi-shot inversion recovery EPI.
    Sanchez Panchuelo RM; Mougin O; Turner R; Francis ST
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jul; 234():117976. PubMed ID: 33781969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diffusion-sensitized ophthalmic magnetic resonance imaging free of geometric distortion at 3.0 and 7.0 T: a feasibility study in healthy subjects and patients with intraocular masses.
    Paul K; Graessl A; Rieger J; Lysiak D; Huelnhagen T; Winter L; Heidemann R; Lindner T; Hadlich S; Zimpfer A; Pohlmann A; Endemann B; Krüger PC; Langner S; Stachs O; Niendorf T
    Invest Radiol; 2015 May; 50(5):309-21. PubMed ID: 25612144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. B
    Boudreau M; Tardif CL; Stikov N; Sled JG; Lee W; Pike GB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1673-1682. PubMed ID: 28301086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface-based functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis of partial brain echo planar imaging data at 1.5 T.
    Jo HJ; Lee JM; Kim JH; Choi CH; Kang DH; Kwon JS; Kim SI
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jun; 27(5):691-700. PubMed ID: 19036544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: feasibility and contrast agent dose.
    Manka C; Träber F; Gieseke J; Schild HH; Kuhl CK
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):869-77. PubMed ID: 15665227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Geometric distortion correction of high-resolution 3 T diffusion tensor brain images.
    Ardekani S; Sinha U
    Magn Reson Med; 2005 Nov; 54(5):1163-71. PubMed ID: 16187289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.