BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29665537)

  • 21. Deep-Learning-Based Semantic Labeling for 2D Mammography and Comparison of Complexity for Machine Learning Tasks.
    Yi PH; Lin A; Wei J; Yu AC; Sair HI; Hui FK; Hager GD; Harvey SC
    J Digit Imaging; 2019 Aug; 32(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 31197559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fully automated nipple detection in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Chae SH; Jeong JW; Choi JH; Chae EY; Kim HH; Choi YW; Lee S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():113-120. PubMed ID: 28391808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Synthesized Digital Mammography Imaging.
    Freer PE; Winkler N
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 28411676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of the Addition of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) to Standard 2D Digital Screening Mammography on the Rates of Patient Recall, Cancer Detection, and Recommendations for Short-term Follow-up.
    Powell JL; Hawley JR; Lipari AM; Yildiz VO; Erdal BS; Carkaci S
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):302-307. PubMed ID: 27919540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
    Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computer-aided assessment of breast density: comparison of supervised deep learning and feature-based statistical learning.
    Li S; Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Lu Y; Zhou C; Hadjiiski LM; Samala RK
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025005. PubMed ID: 29210358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Discriminating solitary cysts from soft tissue lesions in mammography using a pretrained deep convolutional neural network.
    Kooi T; van Ginneken B; Karssemeijer N; den Heeten A
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):1017-1027. PubMed ID: 28094850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis using complementary information of simulated projection.
    Kim ST; Kim DH; Ro YM
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7043-58. PubMed ID: 26632059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Avoiding Tissue Overlap in 2D Images: Single-Slice DBT Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks.
    Mendes J; Matela N; Garcia N
    Tomography; 2023 Feb; 9(1):398-412. PubMed ID: 36828384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions.
    Kooi T; Litjens G; van Ginneken B; Gubern-Mérida A; Sánchez CI; Mann R; den Heeten A; Karssemeijer N
    Med Image Anal; 2017 Jan; 35():303-312. PubMed ID: 27497072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images.
    Reiser I; Nishikawa RM; Giger ML; Wu T; Rafferty EA; Moore R; Kopans DB
    Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):482-91. PubMed ID: 16532956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automated Segmentation of Mass Regions in DBT Images Using a Dilated DCNN Approach.
    Ye J; Yang W; Wang J; Xu X; Li L; Xie C; Chen G; Wang X; Lai X
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():9082694. PubMed ID: 35154309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Deep-learning-based projection-domain breast thickness estimation for shape-prior iterative image reconstruction in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Lee S; Kim H; Lee H; Cho S
    Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 49(6):3670-3682. PubMed ID: 35297075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for breast cancer screening.
    Chougrad H; Zouaki H; Alheyane O
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Apr; 157():19-30. PubMed ID: 29477427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Classification of microcalcification clusters in digital breast tomosynthesis using ensemble convolutional neural network.
    Xiao B; Sun H; Meng Y; Peng Y; Yang X; Chen S; Yan Z; Zheng J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2021 Jul; 20(1):71. PubMed ID: 34320986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Deep learning in mammography and breast histology, an overview and future trends.
    Hamidinekoo A; Denton E; Rampun A; Honnor K; Zwiggelaar R
    Med Image Anal; 2018 Jul; 47():45-67. PubMed ID: 29679847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An iterative reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis imaging using real data at three radiation doses.
    Polat A; Yildirim I
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 29504549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Simultaneous detection and classification of breast masses in digital mammograms via a deep learning YOLO-based CAD system.
    Al-Masni MA; Al-Antari MA; Park JM; Gi G; Kim TY; Rivera P; Valarezo E; Choi MT; Han SM; Kim TS
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Apr; 157():85-94. PubMed ID: 29477437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.