243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29666905)
41. The use of gadolinium chelates for X-ray digital subtraction angiography.
Wagner HJ; Kalinowski M; Klose KJ; Alfke H
Invest Radiol; 2001 May; 36(5):257-65. PubMed ID: 11323513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Evaluation of a noise reduction imaging technology in iliac digital subtraction angiography: noninferior clinical image quality with lower patient and scatter dose.
van Strijen MJ; Grünhagen T; Mauti M; Zähringer M; Gaines PA; Robinson GJ; Railton NJ; van Overhagen H; Habraken J; van Leersum M
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2015 May; 26(5):642-50.e1. PubMed ID: 25770373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Accuracy of CO2 angiography in vessel diameter assessment: a comparative study of CO2 versus iodinated contrast material in an aortoiliac flow model.
Moresco KP; Patel N; Johnson MS; Trobridge D; Bergan KA; Lalka SG
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2000 Apr; 11(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 10787201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Fundamental study of DSA images using gadolinium contrast agent].
Nagashima H; Sakamoto H; Sano Y; Shiraishi A; Igarashi H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Oct; 58(10):1369-76. PubMed ID: 12540764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Automated Angiography in Type II Endoleaks Detection: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.
Mascoli C; Faggioli G; Gallitto E; Vento V; Indelicato G; Pini R; Vacirca A; Stella A; Gargiulo M
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2018; 2018():7647165. PubMed ID: 29780288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Image quality and safety of automated carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography in femoropopliteal lesions: Results from a randomized single-center study.
Bürckenmeyer F; Schmidt A; Diamantis I; Lehmann T; Malouhi A; Franiel T; Zanow J; Teichgräber UKM; Aschenbach R
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 135():109476. PubMed ID: 33388532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Angiography via an aerosol spray. A new technic for arterial imaging with CO2 under DSA conditions].
Schmitz-Rode T; Alzen G; Günther RW
Rofo; 1993 Jul; 159(1):97-9. PubMed ID: 8334266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Carbon-dioxide-guided vascular interventions: technique and pitfalls.
Kessel DO; Robertson I; Patel J; Peters K; Taylor EJ; Denton LJ; Bambhra B
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2002; 25(6):476-83. PubMed ID: 12132028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. C-arm CT--an adjunct to DSA for endoleak classification in patients with endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Wacker FK; Valdeig S; Raatschen HJ; Meyer BC
Rofo; 2014 Mar; 186(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 23999779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Multidetector CT angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for aortoiliac length measurements prior to endovascular AAA repair.
Diehm N; Herrmann P; Dinkel HP
J Endovasc Ther; 2004 Oct; 11(5):527-34. PubMed ID: 15482025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. CO2 digital angiography: a safer contrast agent for renal vascular imaging?
Hawkins IF; Wilcox CS; Kerns SR; Sabatelli FW
Am J Kidney Dis; 1994 Oct; 24(4):685-94. PubMed ID: 7942829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Carbon dioxide digital subtraction arteriography: a pilot study.
Weaver FA; Pentecost MJ; Yellin AE
Ann Vasc Surg; 1990 Sep; 4(5):437-41. PubMed ID: 2121215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Catheter-less angiography for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: a new application of carbon dioxide as a contrast agent.
Criado E; Kabbani L; Cho K
J Vasc Surg; 2008 Sep; 48(3):527-34. PubMed ID: 18632243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Type II endoleak embolization after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with use of real-time three-dimensional fluoroscopic needle guidance.
van Bindsbergen L; Braak SJ; van Strijen MJ; de Vries JP
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Sep; 21(9):1443-7. PubMed ID: 20708410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Carbon dioxide angiography. A new injection system].
Nicolini A; Lovaria A; Meregaglia D; Palatresi S
Radiol Med; 2000; 99(1-2):51-5. PubMed ID: 10803187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Proximal occlusion of unaffected internal iliac artery versus distal occlusion of aneurysmatic internal iliac artery prior to EVAR: a comparative evaluation of efficacy and clinical outcome.
Dierks A; Sauer A; Wolfschmidt F; Hassold N; Kellersmann R; Bley TA; Kickuth R
Br J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 90(1072):20160527. PubMed ID: 28256907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Repair of bilateral common iliac artery aneurysm by potentially reversible, unilateral internal iliac artery embolisation followed by endovascular Y-stenting.
Nett PC; Pfammatter T; Turina M; Lachat ML
Vasa; 2003 May; 32(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 12945105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Detection and characterization of endoleaks following endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms using contrast harmonic imaging (CHI) with quantitative perfusion analysis (TIC) compared to CT angiography (CTA).
Jung EM; Rennert J; Fellner C; Uller W; Jung W; Schreyer A; Heiss P; Hoffstetter P; Feuerbach S; Kasparzk P; Zorger N; Pfister K
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Dec; 31(6):564-70. PubMed ID: 19941253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Digital subtraction angiography using carbon dioxide: an alternative to arteriography of the extremities using iodine-containing contrast media].
Hess H
Rofo; 1990 Sep; 153(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 2171053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A multi-institutional survey of interventional radiology for type II endoleaks after endovascular aortic repair: questionnaire results from the Japanese Society of Endoluminal Metallic Stents and Grafts in Japan.
Ogawa Y; Nishimaki H; Osuga K; Ikeda O; Hongo N; Iwakoshi S; Kawasaki R; Woodhams R; Yamaguchi M; Kamiya M; Kanematsu M; Honda M; Kaminou T; Koizumi J; Kichikawa K
Jpn J Radiol; 2016 Aug; 34(8):564-71. PubMed ID: 27262856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
