211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29667538)
1. Evaluation of gas well setback policy in the Marcellus Shale region of Pennsylvania in relation to emissions of fine particulate matter.
Banan Z; Gernand JM
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2018 Sep; 68(9):988-1000. PubMed ID: 29667538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Particulate matter emissions associated with marcellus shale drilling waste disposal and transport.
Mol MF; Li M; Gernand JM
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 Aug; 70(8):795-809. PubMed ID: 32516062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Synthesis and health-based evaluation of ambient air monitoring data for the Marcellus Shale region.
Long CM; Briggs NL; Bamgbose IA
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 May; 69(5):527-547. PubMed ID: 30698507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health-based evaluation of ambient air measurements of PM
Long CM; Briggs NL; Cochran BA; Mims DM
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2021 Jul; 31(4):614-627. PubMed ID: 33619364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Air pollutant emissions from the development, production, and processing of Marcellus Shale natural gas.
Roy AA; Adams PJ; Robinson AL
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Jan; 64(1):19-37. PubMed ID: 24620400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of three recent coal-fired power plant closings on Pittsburgh air quality: A natural experiment.
Russell MC; Belle JH; Liu Y
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Jan; 67(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 27027572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of Marcellus Shale natural gas development in southwest Pennsylvania on volatile organic compound emissions and regional air quality.
Swarthout RF; Russo RS; Zhou Y; Miller BM; Mitchell B; Horsman E; Lipsky E; McCabe DC; Baum E; Sive BC
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(5):3175-84. PubMed ID: 25594231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Human exposure to unconventional natural gas development: A public health demonstration of periodic high exposure to chemical mixtures in ambient air.
Brown DR; Lewis C; Weinberger BI
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2015; 50(5):460-72. PubMed ID: 25734822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of emissions from natural gas production facilities on ambient air quality in the Barnett Shale area: a pilot study.
Zielinska B; Campbell D; Samburova V
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Dec; 64(12):1369-83. PubMed ID: 25562933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of Tracer Elements for Estimating Community Exposure to Marcellus Shale Development Operations.
Nye M; Knuckles T; Yan B; Ross J; Orem W; Varonka M; Thurston G; Dzomba A; McCawley M
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32178331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methane Emissions from Conventional and Unconventional Natural Gas Production Sites in the Marcellus Shale Basin.
Omara M; Sullivan MR; Li X; Subramanian R; Robinson AL; Presto AA
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Feb; 50(4):2099-107. PubMed ID: 26824407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Influence of Marcellus Shale Extraction Emissions on Regionally Monitored Dry Reactive Nitrogen Deposition.
Coughlin JG; Rose LA; Bain DJ; Elliott EM
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Mar; 51(6):3542-3549. PubMed ID: 28235178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Statistical evaluation of the impact of shale gas activities on ozone pollution in North Texas.
Ahmadi M; John K
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Dec; 536():457-467. PubMed ID: 26232756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of atmospheric pollutants associated with oil and natural gas exploration and production activity in Pennsylvania's Allegheny National Forest.
Pekney NJ; Veloski G; Reeder M; Tamilia J; Rupp E; Wetzel A
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Sep; 64(9):1062-72. PubMed ID: 25283004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Emissions from oil and gas operations in the United States and their air quality implications.
Allen DT
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Jun; 66(6):549-75. PubMed ID: 27249104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mobile measurement of methane and hydrogen sulfide at natural gas production site fence lines in the Texas Barnett Shale.
Eapi GR; Sabnis MS; Sattler ML
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Aug; 64(8):927-44. PubMed ID: 25185395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reported Methane Emissions from Active Oil and Gas Wells in Pennsylvania, 2014-2018.
Ingraffea AR; Wawrzynek PA; Santoro R; Wells M
Environ Sci Technol; 2020 May; 54(9):5783-5789. PubMed ID: 32271017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Importance of Superemitter Natural Gas Well Pads in the Marcellus Shale.
Caulton DR; Lu JM; Lane HM; Buchholz B; Fitts JP; Golston LM; Guo X; Li Q; McSpiritt J; Pan D; Wendt L; Bou-Zeid E; Zondlo MA
Environ Sci Technol; 2019 May; 53(9):4747-4754. PubMed ID: 30855946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Atmospheric emission characterization of Marcellus shale natural gas development sites.
Goetz JD; Floerchinger C; Fortner EC; Wormhoudt J; Massoli P; Knighton WB; Herndon SC; Kolb CE; Knipping E; Shaw SL; DeCarlo PF
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 49(11):7012-20. PubMed ID: 25897974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Leakage detection of Marcellus Shale natural gas at an Upper Devonian gas monitoring well: a 3-d numerical modeling approach.
Zhang L; Anderson N; Dilmore R; Soeder DJ; Bromhal G
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Sep; 48(18):10795-803. PubMed ID: 25144442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
