BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29667616)

  • 1. Using the prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RIDS v2) to detect prostate cancer can prevent unnecessary biopsies and invasive treatment.
    Liu C; Liu SL; Wang ZX; Yu K; Feng CX; Ke Z; Wang L; Zeng XY
    Asian J Androl; 2018; 20(5):459-464. PubMed ID: 29667616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].
    Zuo MZ; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Zhang CY; Wen R; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Wu JF; Li X; Shen JK
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 97(47):3693-3698. PubMed ID: 29325321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml?
    Xu N; Wu YP; Chen DN; Ke ZB; Cai H; Wei Y; Zheng QS; Huang JB; Li XD; Xue XY
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2018 May; 144(5):987-995. PubMed ID: 29504080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating the role of DCE-MRI, over T2 and DWI, in accurate PI-RADS v2 assessment of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate lesions as defined at radical prostatectomy.
    Taghipour M; Ziaei A; Alessandrino F; Hassanzadeh E; Harisinghani M; Vangel M; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Apr; 44(4):1520-1527. PubMed ID: 30361870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naïve patients.
    Washino S; Okochi T; Saito K; Konishi T; Hirai M; Kobayashi Y; Miyagawa T
    BJU Int; 2017 Feb; 119(2):225-233. PubMed ID: 26935594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and internal validation of PI-RADs v2-based model for clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhu YC; Huang YXR; Guo Q; Tian Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 16(1):102. PubMed ID: 29859119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Value of PI-RADS v2 scores combined with prostate specific antigen in diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer: a logistic regression analysis].
    Lei LZ; Xu YK; Hou MR; He MQ
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2017 Aug; 37(8):1092-1097. PubMed ID: 28801291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the performance of PI-RADS v2 in the non-academic setting.
    Jordan EJ; Fiske C; Zagoria RJ; Westphalen AC
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Nov; 42(11):2725-2731. PubMed ID: 28451763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinically insignificant prostate cancer suitable for active surveillance according to Prostate Cancer Research International: Active surveillance criteria: Utility of PI-RADS v2.
    Yim JH; Kim CK; Kim JH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1072-1079. PubMed ID: 28901655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Prospective Accuracy Study of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With Whole-mount Pathology.
    Giannarini G; Girometti R; Crestani A; Rossanese M; Calandriello M; Cereser L; Bednarova S; Battistella C; Sioletic S; Zuiani C; Valotto C; Ficarra V
    Urology; 2019 Jan; 123():191-197. PubMed ID: 30273613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Clinical, and Biopsy Findings in Suspected Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Haj-Mirzaian A; Burk KS; Lacson R; Glazer DI; Saini S; Kibel AS; Khorasani R
    JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Mar; 7(3):e244258. PubMed ID: 38551559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developing a nomogram based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for forecasting high-grade prostate cancer to reduce unnecessary biopsies within the prostate-specific antigen gray zone.
    Niu XK; Li J; Das SK; Xiong Y; Yang CB; Peng T
    BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 17(1):11. PubMed ID: 28143433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2.
    Feng ZY; Wang L; Min XD; Wang SG; Wang GP; Cai J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Oct; 129(20):2451-2459. PubMed ID: 27748338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic Performance of Prostate-specific Antigen Density for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Wang S; Kozarek J; Russell R; Drescher M; Khan A; Kundra V; Barry KH; Naslund M; Siddiqui MM
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Apr; 7(2):189-203. PubMed ID: 37640584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PI-RADS v2 and periprostatic fat measured on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can predict upgrading in radical prostatectomy pathology amongst patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer.
    Zhai L; Fan Y; Sun S; Wang H; Meng Y; Hu S; Wang X; Yu W; Jin J
    Scand J Urol; 2018; 52(5-6):333-339. PubMed ID: 30895901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PI-RADS v2.1 and PSAD for the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer among patients with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml.
    Wen J; Liu W; Shen X; Hu W
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6570. PubMed ID: 38503972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer.
    Otti VC; Miller C; Powell RJ; Thomas RM; McGrath JS
    BJU Int; 2019 Jan; 123(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 29804315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiparametric Magnetic-Resonance to Confirm Eligibility to an Active Surveillance Program for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Intermediate Time Results of a Third Referral High Volume Centre Active Surveillance Protocol.
    Luzzago S; Musi G; Catellani M; Russo A; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Bianchi R; Cozzi G; Conti A; Pricolo P; Ferro M; Matei DV; Mirone V; Petralia G; de Cobelli O
    Urol Int; 2018; 101(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 29734177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2) and periprostatic fat thickness on multi-parametric MRI to predict the presence of prostate cancer.
    Cao Y; Cao M; Chen Y; Yu W; Fan Y; Liu Q; Gao G; Zhao Z; Wang X; Jin J
    Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(27):44040-44049. PubMed ID: 28476042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining Prostate Health Index density, magnetic resonance imaging and prior negative biopsy status to improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Druskin SC; Tosoian JJ; Young A; Collica S; Srivastava A; Ghabili K; Macura KJ; Carter HB; Partin AW; Sokoll LJ; Ross AE; Pavlovich CP
    BJU Int; 2018 Apr; 121(4):619-626. PubMed ID: 29232037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.