152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29667881)
1. The ability of ADC measurements in the assessment of patients with stage I endometrial carcinoma based on three risk categories.
Liu J; Yuan F; Wang S; Chen X; Ma F; Zhang G; Tian X
Acta Radiol; 2019 Jan; 60(1):120-128. PubMed ID: 29667881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Utility of the relative apparent diffusion coefficient for preoperative assessment of low risk endometrial carcinoma.
Shen Y; Lv F; Xiao Z; Bi Q
Clin Imaging; 2019; 56():28-32. PubMed ID: 30851496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can the apparent diffusion coefficient differentiate the grade of endometrioid adenocarcinoma and the histological subtype of endometrial cancer?
Yan B; Zhao T; Liang X; Niu C; Ding C
Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):363-370. PubMed ID: 28696169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pathological characteristics and risk stratification in patients with stage I endometrial cancer: utility of apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis.
An T; Kim CK
Br J Radiol; 2021 Oct; 94(1126):20210151. PubMed ID: 34233478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The value of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating type II from type I endometrial carcinoma.
Chen J; Fan W; Gu H; Wang Y; Liu Y; Chen X; Ren S; Wang Z
Acta Radiol; 2021 Jul; 62(7):959-965. PubMed ID: 32727213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The prominent value of apparent diffusion coefficient in assessing high-risk factors and prognosis for patients with endometrial carcinoma before treatment.
Quan Q; Lu Y; Xuan B; Wu J; Yin W; Hua Y; Chen R; Ren S; Zhou S; Zhang F; Meng Y; Rao K; Mu X
Acta Radiol; 2021 Jun; 62(6):830-838. PubMed ID: 32702999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation and validation of the diagnostic value of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating early-stage endometrial carcinomas from benign mimickers at 3T MRI.
Wang X; Zhao Y; Hu Y; Zhou Y; Ye X; Liu K; Bai G; Guo A; Du M; Jiang L; Wang J; Yan Z
Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(28):46390-46397. PubMed ID: 28634318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative evaluation of diffusion-kurtosis imaging for grading endometrial carcinoma: a comparative study with diffusion-weighted imaging.
Chen T; Li Y; Lu SS; Zhang YD; Wang XN; Luo CY; Shi HB
Clin Radiol; 2017 Nov; 72(11):995.e11-995.e20. PubMed ID: 28774471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multi-b-value diffusion weighted imaging for preoperative evaluation of risk stratification in early-stage endometrial cancer.
Zhang Q; Yu X; Lin M; Xie L; Zhang M; Ouyang H; Zhao X
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 119():108637. PubMed ID: 31446209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is the standard deviation of the apparent diffusion coefficient a potential tool for the preoperative prediction of tumor grade in endometrial cancer?
Yan B; Liang X; Zhao T; Ding C; Zhang M
Acta Radiol; 2020 Dec; 61(12):1724-1732. PubMed ID: 32366108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative analysis of the value of diffusion kurtosis imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluating the histological features of endometrial cancer.
Yue W; Meng N; Wang J; Liu W; Wang X; Yan M; Han D; Cheng J
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Feb; 19(1):9. PubMed ID: 30764876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in association with pathologic upgrading in biopsy-proven grade I endometrial cancer.
Park JJ; Kim CK; Cho SW; Kim JH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jan; 51(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 31206949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps obtained using 3.0T MRI for distinguishing uterine carcinosarcoma from endometrial carcinoma.
Takahashi M; Kozawa E; Tanisaka M; Hasegawa K; Yasuda M; Sakai F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1301-7. PubMed ID: 26605502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endometrial carcinoma: diffusion-weighted imaging diagnostic accuracy and correlation with Ki-67 expression.
Jiang JX; Zhao JL; Zhang Q; Qing JF; Zhang SQ; Zhang YM; Wu XH
Clin Radiol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):413.e1-413.e6. PubMed ID: 29246587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram as a quantitative biomarker to preoperatively differentiate stage IA endometrial carcinoma from benign endometrial lesions.
Zhang J; Yu X; Zhang X; Chen S; Song Y; Xie L; Chen Y; Ouyang H
BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Aug; 22(1):139. PubMed ID: 35941559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The volumetric ADC histogram analysis in differentiating stage IA endometrial carcinoma from endometrial polyp.
Zhao Y; You C; Zhou X; Li X; Zhang C; Wu Y; Shen W
Br J Radiol; 2024 May; 97(1158):1139-1145. PubMed ID: 38662891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of normal and diseased uterine zones.
Kilickesmez O; Bayramoglu S; Inci E; Cimilli T; Kayhan A
Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19235579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient at 3T in distinguishing between adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix and endometrium.
Lin YC; Lin G; Chen YR; Yen TC; Wang CC; Ng KK
Chang Gung Med J; 2011; 34(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 21392479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The value of T2 mapping for evaluating the pathological type, grade and depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma].
Li SJ; Zhang ZX; Liu J; Wang WJ; Wang J; Zhang Y; Cheng JL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2023 Aug; 45(8):673-680. PubMed ID: 37580272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the differential diagnosis of uterine endometrial cavity tumors.
Karakas O; Karakas E; Dogan F; Kilicaslan N; Camuzcuoglu A; Incebiyik A; Camuzcuoglu H
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2015 Apr; 127(7-8):266-73. PubMed ID: 25708066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
