These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2966820)
1. Marginal sealing of curing contraction gaps in Class V composite resin restorations. Kemp-Scholte CM; Davidson CL J Dent Res; 1988 May; 67(5):841-5. PubMed ID: 2966820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Polymerization contraction stress of resin composite restorations in a model Class I cavity configuration using photoelastic analysis. Kinomoto Y; Torii M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(6):309-19. PubMed ID: 14743526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. Kemp-Scholte CM; Davidson CL J Dent Res; 1990 Jun; 69(6):1240-3. PubMed ID: 2141338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations. Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of incremental curing on contraction stresses associated with various resin composite buildups. Tachibana K; Kuroe T; Tanino Y; Satoh N; Ohata N; Sano H; Caputo AA Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 15119716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies. Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength. Pongprueksa P; Kuphasuk W; Senawongse P Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):466-75. PubMed ID: 17910223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new method for sealing composite resin contraction gaps in lined cavities. Torstenson B; Brännström M; Mattsson B J Dent Res; 1985 Mar; 64(3):450-3. PubMed ID: 3156165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of flowable resin on bond strength and gap formation in Class I restorations. Miguez PA; Pereira PN; Foxton RM; Walter R; Nunes MF; Swift EJ Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):839-45. PubMed ID: 15451239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SEM evaluation of marginal sealing on composite restorations using different photoactivation and composite insertion methods. Lopes MB; Costa LA; Consani S; Gonini AJ; Sinhoreti MA Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 20139558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microleakage of Class V composites using different placement and curing techniques: an in vitro study. St Georges AJ; Wilder AD; Perdigão J; Swift EJ Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 12572642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Polymerization contraction stress of low-shrinkage composites and its correlation with microleakage in class V restorations. Calheiros FC; Sadek FT; Braga RR; Cardoso PE J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):407-12. PubMed ID: 15193790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations. Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of light-curing method and irradiation time on marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations. Yoshikawa T; Nakaoki Y; Takada T; Burrow MF; Tagami J Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():63A-67A. PubMed ID: 14674502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Concurrent evaluation of composite internal adaptation and bond strength in a class-I cavity. Bakhsh TA; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Mandurah MM; Hariri I; Alsayed EZ; Tagami J; Sumi Y J Dent; 2013 Jan; 41(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 23044389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of the soft-start (pulse-delay) polymerization technique in Class I and II composite restorations. Chan DC; Browning WD; Frazier KB; Brackett MG Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 18505216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations. Cho BH; Dickens SH; Bae JH; Chang CG; Son HH; Um CM Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 12022463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of stepped light exposure on the volumetric polymerization shrinkage and bulk modulus of dental composites and an unfilled resin. Price RB; Rizkalla AS; Hall GC Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):176-80. PubMed ID: 11763926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization". Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations. Aggarwal V; Logani A; Jain V; Shah N Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]