These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2966820)

  • 21. Effect of mechanical properties of resin composites on the efficacy of the dentin bonding system.
    Hasegawa T; Itoh K; Koike T; Yukitani W; Hisamitsu H; Wakumoto S; Fujishima A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 10823080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cervical gap formation in class II composite resin restorations.
    Ehrnford L; Dérand T
    Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 6372145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Does layering minimize shrinkage stresses in composite restorations?
    Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Barink M; Verdonschot N
    J Dent Res; 2003 Dec; 82(12):967-71. PubMed ID: 14630896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems.
    Ramos RP; Chinelatti MA; Chimello DT; Dibb RG
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):450-6. PubMed ID: 12073726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Resin composites: Modulus of elasticity and marginal quality.
    Benetti AR; Peutzfeldt A; Lussi A; Flury S
    J Dent; 2014 Sep; 42(9):1185-92. PubMed ID: 25019363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems.
    Kemp-Scholte CM; Davidson CL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Dec; 64(6):658-64. PubMed ID: 2079671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
    Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without 'softstart-polymerization'.
    Mehl A; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH
    J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):321-30. PubMed ID: 9175364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The initial gap around large composite restorations in vitro: the effect of etching enamel walls.
    Brännström M; Torstenson B; Nordenvall KJ
    J Dent Res; 1984 May; 63(5):681-4. PubMed ID: 6231320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations.
    Rocha Gomes Torres C; Rêgo HM; Perote LC; Santos LF; Kamozaki MB; Gutierrez NC; Di Nicoló R; Borges AB
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 24769385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Class 2 composite restorations: prevention in vitro of contraction gaps.
    Jørgensen KD; Hisamitsu H
    J Dent Res; 1984 Feb; 63(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 6229556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of the curing method and composite volume on marginal and internal adaptation of composite restoratives.
    Souza-Junior EJ; de Souza-Régis MR; Alonso RC; de Freitas AP; Sinhoreti MA; Cunha LG
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 21702671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
    Olmez A; Oztas N; Bodur H
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):713-9. PubMed ID: 15646229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of curing methods and matrix type on the marginal seal of class II resin-based composite restorations in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Hunecke A
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16536200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Polymerization shrinkage of experimental short glass fiber-reinforced composite with semi-inter penetrating polymer network matrix.
    Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Watts DC; Lassila LV
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 17531311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology.
    Ilie N; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2011 Apr; 27(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 21194743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.