162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29668374)
1. Evidence-based occupational hearing screening II: validation of a screening methodology using measures of functional hearing ability.
Soli SD; Amano-Kusumoto A; Clavier O; Wilbur J; Casto K; Freed D; Laroche C; Vaillancourt V; Giguère C; Dreschler WA; Rhebergen KS
Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(5):323-334. PubMed ID: 29668374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence-Based Occupational Hearing Screening I: Modeling the Effects of Real-World Noise Environments on the Likelihood of Effective Speech Communication.
Soli SD; Giguère C; Laroche C; Vaillancourt V; Dreschler WA; Rhebergen KS; Harkins K; Ruckstuhl M; Ramulu P; Meyers LS
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):436-448. PubMed ID: 29697497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of the intelligibility for speech in real-life background noises for subjects with normal hearing.
Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 18490862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modelling the speech reception threshold in non-stationary noise in hearing-impaired listeners as a function of level.
Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; de Laat JA; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2010 Nov; 49(11):856-65. PubMed ID: 20936997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Matrix sentence intelligibility prediction using an automatic speech recognition system.
Schädler MR; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():100-7. PubMed ID: 26383042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
Smits C; Theo Goverts S; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The intelligibility of sentences in quiet and in noise in aged listeners.
Duquesnoy AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1136-44. PubMed ID: 6643835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of an internet-based speech-in-noise screening test for school-age children.
Sheikh Rashid M; Dreschler WA; de Laat JAPM
Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):967-975. PubMed ID: 28936876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
Warzybok A; Zokoll M; Wardenga N; Ozimek E; Boboshko M; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Functionally-based screening criteria for hearing-critical jobs based on the Hearing in Noise Test.
Giguère C; Laroche C; Soli SD; Vaillancourt V
Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):319-28. PubMed ID: 18569104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
Puglisi GE; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Visentin C; Astolfi A; Prodi N; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revision, extension, and evaluation of a binaural speech intelligibility model.
Beutelmann R; Brand T; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2479-97. PubMed ID: 20370031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of speech intelligibility in spatial noise and reverberation for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Beutelmann R; Brand T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jul; 120(1):331-42. PubMed ID: 16875230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting speech intelligibility in hearing-impaired listeners using a physiologically inspired auditory model.
Zaar J; Carney LH
Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108553. PubMed ID: 35750575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterizing the Speech Reception Threshold in hearing-impaired listeners in relation to masker type and masker level.
Rhebergen KS; Pool RE; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1491-505. PubMed ID: 24606285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
