83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29668476)
1. Factors That Influence Surgical Margin State in Patients Undergoing Cold Knife Conization - A Single Center Experience.
Aluloski I; Tanturovski M; Petrusevska G; Jovanovic R; Kostadinova-Kunovska S
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2017 Dec; 38(3):113-120. PubMed ID: 29668476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can we predict surgical margin positivity while performing cervical excisional procedures?
Durmuş Y; Karalök A; Başaran D; Kamani MO; Boran N; Koç S; Turan AT
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):666-672. PubMed ID: 31482755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of a machine learning-based model for predicting positive margins in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) treatment by Cold Knife Conization(CKC): a single-center retrospective study.
Zhang L; Zheng Y; Lei L; Zhang X; Yang J; Zeng Y; Chen K
BMC Womens Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):332. PubMed ID: 38849836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Triage for management of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive margin by conization: a retrospective analysis.
Dou Y; Zhang X; Li Y; Wang F; Xie X; Wang X
Front Med; 2017 Jun; 11(2):223-228. PubMed ID: 28488232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is there any predictor for residual disease after cervical conization with positive surgical margins for HSIL or microinvasive cervical cancer?
Tasci T; Turan T; Ureyen I; Karalok A; Kalyoncu R; Boran N; Tulunay G
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Apr; 19(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 25259663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Relationship between various histological status of margins of LEEP and residual HSIL or worse at hysterectomy following conization].
Xiao YP; Tao X; Zhao CY; Qu YQ; Xie F; Ning Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 30695901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Positive margin prevalence and risk factors with cervical specimens obtained from loop electrosurgical excision procedures and cold knife conization.
Panna S; Luanratanakorn S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2009; 10(4):637-40. PubMed ID: 19827885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: a comparison of loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization.
Latif NA; Neubauer NL; Helenowski IB; Lurain JR
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Apr; 19(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 25089550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study.
Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk Factor Analysis of Persistent High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Conization.
Chen L; Liu L; Tao X; Guo L; Zhang H; Sui L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Jan; 23(1):24-27. PubMed ID: 30371553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors affecting residual/recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after cervical conization with negative margins.
Fan A; Wang C; Han C; Wang Y; Xue F; Zhang L
J Med Virol; 2018 Sep; 90(9):1541-1548. PubMed ID: 29704442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk factors for human papillomavirus persistence among women undergoing cold-knife conization for treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Baser E; Ozgu E; Erkilinc S; Togrul C; Caglar M; Gungor T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 24726620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effectiveness of cold-knife conization (CKC) for post-menopausal women with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a retrospective study.
Li X; Liu M; Ji Y; Qu P
BMC Surg; 2021 May; 21(1):241. PubMed ID: 33975589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The characteristics of the residual disease after cervical conization: A retrospective analysis from a tertiary gynecological cancer center.
Giray B; Kabaca C; Uzun MG
Indian J Cancer; 2023; 60(3):390-395. PubMed ID: 36861714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical value of cold knife conization as conservative management in patients with microinvasive cervical squamous cell cancer (stage IA1).
He Y; Wu YM; Zhao Q; Wang T; Wang Y; Kong WM; Song F; Duan W; Zhu L; Zhang WY
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1306-11. PubMed ID: 24987910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal cone size to predict positive surgical margins after cold knife conization (CKC) and the risk factors for residual disease.
Öz M; Çetinkaya N; Korkmaz E; Seçkin KD; Meydanlı MM; Güngör T
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2016; 17(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 27651725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of different instruments and suture methods of conization for cervical lesions.
Wang X; Li L; Bi Y; Wu H; Wu M; Lang J
Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):19114. PubMed ID: 31836814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conservative treatment of microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix stage IA1: Defining conization height to an optimal oncological outcome.
Hartman CA; Bragança JF; Gurgel MSC; Zeferino LC; Andrade LALA; Teixeira JC
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253998. PubMed ID: 34283862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens.
Chang DY; Cheng WF; Torng PL; Chen RJ; Huang SC
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8898168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
