BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29668476)

  • 21. Risk Factors for Persistence or Recurrence of High-Grade Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions.
    Bittencourt DD; Zanine RM; Sebastião APM; Ribas CM
    Rev Col Bras Cir; 2023; 50():e20233537. PubMed ID: 38055549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predictive value of negative cone margin status for risk of residual disease among women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ.
    Kietpeerakool C; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Kasunan A; Sribanditmongkol N; Siriaungkul S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 119(3):266-9. PubMed ID: 22939281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Risk factors predicting residual lesion in subsequent hysterectomy following cold knife conization (CKC) for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL).
    Zeng Y; Jiang T; Zheng Y; Yang J; Wei H; Yi C; Liu Y; Chen K
    BMC Womens Health; 2022 Aug; 22(1):358. PubMed ID: 36042513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Reasonable surgical approach for grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
    Wu X; Cui Y; Gong Y; Xu H; Jiang D; Meng S
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Aug; 37(8):824-8. PubMed ID: 22954923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Discussion on the diagnosis and treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in post-menopausal women].
    Cao QW; You ZX; Qian XY; Heng D; Tang MY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):393-398. PubMed ID: 31262123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Factors associated with cone margin involvement in CIN patients undergoing conization-equivalent electrosurgical procedure.
    Costa S; De Nuzzo M; Terzano P; Santini D; De Simone P; Bovicelli A; Bovicelli L; Bucchi L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Jul; 79(7):586-92. PubMed ID: 10929960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Conization with positive margins: what strategy should be adopted?].
    Bretelle F; Cravello L; Yang L; Benmoura D; Roger V; Blanc B
    Ann Chir; 2000 Jun; 125(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 10925486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predictors of high-grade residual disease after repeat conization in patients with positive surgical margins.
    Minareci Y; Ak N; Tosun OA; Sozen H; Disci R; Topuz S; Salihoglu MY
    Ginekol Pol; 2022; 93(12):962-967. PubMed ID: 35894500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Risk of residual disease and invasive carcinoma in women treated for adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
    Costales AB; Milbourne AM; Rhodes HE; Munsell MF; Wallbillich JJ; Brown J; Frumovitz M; Ramondetta LM; Schmeler KM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Jun; 129(3):513-6. PubMed ID: 23541795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modified method of cervical conization with hybrid use of a cold knife and an electric knife for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    Zhang W; Lin Y
    J Int Med Res; 2022 Jun; 50(6):3000605221106414. PubMed ID: 35726589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Menopausal status is associated with a high risk for residual disease after cervical conization with positive margins.
    Bilibio JP; Monego HI; Binda MLA; Dos Reis R
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0217562. PubMed ID: 31163055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison between type 3 excision of the transformation zone by straight wire excision of the transformation zone (SWETZ) and large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ): a randomized study.
    Russomano F; Tristao MA; Côrtes R; de Camargo MJ
    BMC Womens Health; 2015; 15():12. PubMed ID: 25783647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical outcomes of patients with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix treated by conization.
    Taylor JS; Panico V; Caputo T; Gerber D; Gupta D; Pirog E; Holcomb K
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2014; 35(6):641-5. PubMed ID: 25556268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Complications, sequellae and outcome of cervical conizations: evaluation of three surgical technics].
    Brun JL; Youbi A; Hocké C
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Oct; 31(6):558-64. PubMed ID: 12407327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Frozen section evaluation of cervical cold knife cone specimens is accurate in the diagnosis of microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma.
    Giuntoli RL; Winburn KA; Silverman MB; Keeney GL; Cliby WA
    Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Nov; 91(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 14599856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Appropriate of Cone Depth in Loop Electrical Excision Procedure (LEEP) for Negative Pathological Margin from High Grade Precancerous Lesion of Cervix, Retrospective Study.
    Srijarusith N; Rodpenpear N
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Feb; 23(2):659-664. PubMed ID: 35225479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Can it replace cold knife conization?
    Eduardo AM; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Yandell RB; Schnadig VJ
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):729-32. PubMed ID: 8913973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Association of menopause, aging and treatment procedures with positive margins after therapeutic cervical conization for CIN 3: a retrospective study of 8,856 patients by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
    Ikeda M; Mikami M; Yasaka M; Enomoto T; Kobayashi Y; Nagase S; Yokoyama M; Katabuchi H
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Sep; 32(5):e68. PubMed ID: 34132067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cold knife versus laser cone biopsy for adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix--a comparison of management and outcome.
    Dalrymple C; Valmadre S; Cook A; Atkinson K; Carter J; Houghton CR; Russell P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2008; 18(1):116-20. PubMed ID: 17506846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: management and outcome.
    Azodi M; Chambers SK; Rutherford TJ; Kohorn EI; Schwartz PE; Chambers JT
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Jun; 73(3):348-53. PubMed ID: 10366458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.