158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29669676)
1. Evaluation of Absorbent Versus Conventional Wound Dressing.
Bredow J; Hoffmann K; Oppermann J; Hellmich M; Eysel P; Zarghooni K
Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2018 Mar; 115(13):213-219. PubMed ID: 29669676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Open-label randomized controlled trial to compare wound dressings for patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
López-Parra M; Gil-Rey D; López-González E; González-Rodríguez EM; Simó-Sánchez I; Zamora-Carmona F; Roqueta-Andreu L; Arizu-Puigvert M; Abril-Sabater D; Moreno-Álvarez À; López-Bonet À; López-Hidalgo G; Costa-Ventura H; García-Pardo L; Rico-Liberato M; García-Borràs M; Arnal-Leris MT; Sianes-Gallén M; Vives R
Trials; 2018 Jul; 19(1):357. PubMed ID: 29976227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical trial to evaluate the performance of a flexible self-adherent absorbent dressing coated with a soft silicone layer compared to a standard wound dressing after orthopedic or spinal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Bredow J; Oppermann J; Hoffmann K; Hellmich M; Wenk B; Simons M; Eysel P; Zarghooni K
Trials; 2015 Mar; 16():81. PubMed ID: 25873529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is the use of modern versus conventional wound dressings warranted after primary knee and hip arthroplasty? Results of a Prospective Comparative Study.
Zarghooni K; Bredow J; Siewe J; Deutloff N; Meyer HS; Lohmann C
Acta Orthop Belg; 2015 Dec; 81(4):768-75. PubMed ID: 26790803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective randomized controlled clinical investigation comparing two post-operative wound dressings used after elective hip and knee replacement; Mepilex® Border Post-Op versus Aquacel® surgical.
Beele H; Van Overschelde P; Olivecrona C; Smet S
Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs; 2020 Aug; 38():100772. PubMed ID: 32473865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of innovative postoperative wound dressings after total knee arthroplasty.
Dobbelaere A; Schuermans N; Smet S; Van Der Straeten C; Victor J
Acta Orthop Belg; 2015 Sep; 81(3):454-61. PubMed ID: 26435241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhancing patient recovery following lower limb arthroplasty with a modern wound dressing: a prospective, comparative audit.
Hopper GP; Deakin AH; Crane EO; Clarke JV
J Wound Care; 2012 Apr; 21(4):200-3. PubMed ID: 22584680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized controlled trial of conventional versus modern surgical dressings following primary total hip and knee replacement.
Langlois J; Zaoui A; Ozil C; Courpied JP; Anract P; Hamadouche M
Int Orthop; 2015 Jul; 39(7):1315-9. PubMed ID: 25787680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In search of the optimal wound dressing material following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sharma G; Lee SW; Atanacio O; Parvizi J; Kim TK
Int Orthop; 2017 Jul; 41(7):1295-1305. PubMed ID: 28493210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tourniquet Release Prior to Dressing Application Reduces Blistering Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Heller S; Chen A; Restrepo C; Albert E; Hozack WJ
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1207-10. PubMed ID: 25770863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical hip dressings: a comparison of taping methods.
Milne CT; Barrere CC; McLaughlin T; Moore A
Orthop Nurs; 1999; 18(3):37-42. PubMed ID: 11052029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Devices Improve Short-Term Wound Complications, but Not Long-Term Infection Rate Following Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.
Keeney JA; Cook JL; Clawson SW; Aggarwal A; Stannard JP
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Apr; 34(4):723-728. PubMed ID: 30612833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective clinical audit of a new dressing design for lower limb arthroplasty wounds.
Clarke JV; Deakin AH; Dillon JM; Emmerson S; Kinninmonth AW
J Wound Care; 2009 Jan; 18(1):5-8, 10-1. PubMed ID: 19131911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of Different Wound Dressings in the Reduction of Blisters and Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Kuo FC; Hsu CW; Tan TL; Lin PY; Tu YK; Chen PC
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jul; 36(7):2612-2629. PubMed ID: 33707123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of dressing choice on outcomes after hip and knee arthroplasty: a literature review.
Tustanowski J
J Wound Care; 2009 Nov; 18(11):449-50, 452, 454, passim. PubMed ID: 19901873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Wound complications after hip surgery using a tapeless compressive support.
Hahn GJ; Grant D; Bartke C; McCartin J; Carn RM
Orthop Nurs; 1999; 18(3):43-9. PubMed ID: 11052030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Silver-Impregnated Occlusive Dressing Reduces Rates of Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty.
Grosso MJ; Berg A; LaRussa S; Murtaugh T; Trofa DP; Geller JA
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Mar; 32(3):929-932. PubMed ID: 27776905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wound blisters post hip surgery: a prospective trial comparing dressings.
Lawrentschuk N; Falkenberg MP; Pirpiris M
ANZ J Surg; 2002 Oct; 72(10):716-9. PubMed ID: 12534381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of Negative-Pressure Wound Dressings to Prevent Surgical Site Complications After Primary Hip Arthroplasty: A Pilot RCT.
Gillespie BM; Rickard CM; Thalib L; Kang E; Finigan T; Homer A; Lonie G; Pitchford D; Chaboyer W
Surg Innov; 2015 Oct; 22(5):488-95. PubMed ID: 25733548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Management of a Patient With Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Using Silicone Transfer Foam Dressings and a Secondary Absorbent Dressing.
McCarthy KD; Donovan RM
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2016; 43(6):650-651. PubMed ID: 27820589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
