202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29671208)
1. Different pixel pitch and maximum luminance of medical grade displays may result in different evaluations of digital radiography images.
Laffranchi A; Cicero C; Lualdi M; Ciniselli CM; Calareso G; Canestrini S; Greco FG; Alberioli E; Cavatorta C; Guarise A; Pignoli E; Plebani M; Scaramuzza D; Siciliano C; Verderio P; Marchianò A
Radiol Med; 2018 Aug; 123(8):586-592. PubMed ID: 29671208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How Does the Display Luminance Level Affect Detectability of Breast Microcalcifications and Spiculated Lesions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Images?
Ferranti C; Primolevo A; Cartia F; Cavatorta C; Ciniselli CM; Lualdi M; Meroni S; Pignoli E; Plebani M; Siciliano C; Verderio P; Scaperrotta G
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):795-801. PubMed ID: 28189505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of luminance and resolution on observer performance with chest radiographs.
Herron JM; Bender TM; Campbell WL; Sumkin JH; Rockette HE; Gur D
Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 10751483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone suppressed images improve radiologists' detection performance for pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs.
Schalekamp S; van Ginneken B; Meiss L; Peters-Bax L; Quekel LG; Snoeren MM; Tiehuis AM; Wittenberg R; Karssemeijer N; Schaefer-Prokop CM
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2399-405. PubMed ID: 24113431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs.
Goo JM; Choi JY; Im JG; Lee HJ; Chung MJ; Han D; Park SH; Kim JH; Nam SH
Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):762-6. PubMed ID: 15273338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of medical-grade and calibrated consumer-grade displays for diagnosis of subtle bone fissures.
Pinto Dos Santos D; Welter J; Emrich T; Jungmann F; Dappa E; Mildenberger P; Kloeckner R
Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5049-5055. PubMed ID: 28660305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical grade vs off-the-shelf color displays: influence on observer performance and visual search.
Krupinski EA
J Digit Imaging; 2009 Aug; 22(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 18769964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Usefulness of reduced image display size in softcopy reading: evaluation of lung nodules in chest screening.
Bessho Y; Yamaguchi M; Fujita H; Azuma M
Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):940-6. PubMed ID: 19446475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of greyscale liquid crystal displays of different resolutions on observer performance during detection of small solitary pulmonary nodules.
Yin J; Guo Q; Zhang W; Su H; Zhang J; Yue Y; Ding C; Lin A; Wang Y; Wang H
Br J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 85(1017):e549-55. PubMed ID: 22744323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of the perceptional performance of high resolution flat panel displays].
Araki Y; Sanada S; Kobayashi T; Hashimoto N; Funabasama S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Aug; 61(8):1151-7. PubMed ID: 16132034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of diagnosis of subtle chest disease and subtle fractures with a teleradiology system.
Larson A; Lynch DA; Zeligman B; Harlow C; Vanoni C; Thieme G; Kilcoyne R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 9423590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with Film Digital Radiography System.
Goodman LR; Foley WD; Wilson CR; Rimm AA; Lawson TL
Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 3940392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The value of digital tomosynthesis in the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary lesions on chest radiography: analysis of diagnostic accuracy and confidence.
Quaia E; Baratella E; Cioffi V; Bregant P; Cernic S; Cuttin R; Cova MA
Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1267-74. PubMed ID: 20591695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on observer performance for the detection of nodular lesions on chest radiographs.
Usami H; Ikeda M; Ishigaki T; Fukushima H; Shimamoto K
Eur Radiol; 2006 Mar; 16(3):726-32. PubMed ID: 16284772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of cervical spine fracture on computed radiography images a monitor resolution study.
Awan O; Safdar NM; Siddiqui KM; Moffitt R; Siegel EL
Acad Radiol; 2011 Mar; 18(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 21215662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performance of a prototype dual-energy chest imaging system ROC analysis.
Kashani H; Varon CA; Paul NS; Gang GJ; Van Metter R; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH
Acad Radiol; 2010 Mar; 17(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 20042351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chest radiography: comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film.
Cox GG; Cook LT; McMillan JH; Rosenthal SJ; Dwyer SJ
Radiology; 1990 Sep; 176(3):771-6. PubMed ID: 2389035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital mammography: observer performance study of the effects of pixel size on the characterization of malignant and benign microcalcifications.
Chan HP; Helvie MA; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Adler DD; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Blane CE; Joynt LK; Wilson TE; Hadjiiski LM; Goodsitt MM
Acad Radiol; 2001 Jun; 8(6):454-66. PubMed ID: 11394537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing film and digital radiographs for reliability of pneumoconiosis classifications: a modeling approach.
Sen A; Lee SY; Gillespie BW; Kazerooni EA; Goodsitt MM; Rosenman KD; Lockey JE; Meyer CA; Petsonk EL; Wang ML; Franzblau A
Acad Radiol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 20207319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved detection of focal pneumonia by chest radiography with bone suppression imaging.
Li F; Engelmann R; Pesce L; Armato SG; Macmahon H
Eur Radiol; 2012 Dec; 22(12):2729-35. PubMed ID: 22763504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
