201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29671208)
21. Digital radiography of subtle pulmonary abnormalities: an ROC study of the effect of pixel size on observer performance.
MacMahon H; Vyborny CJ; Metz CE; Doi K; Sabeti V; Solomon SL
Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 3940383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic accuracy of fracture detection in suspected non-accidental injury: the effect of edge enhancement and digital display on observer performance.
Offiah AC; Moon L; Hall CM; Todd-Pokropek A
Clin Radiol; 2006 Feb; 61(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 16439222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of digital tomosynthesis and chest radiography in evaluating airway lesions using computed tomography as a reference.
Choo JY; Lee KY; Yu A; Kim JH; Lee SH; Choi JW; Kang EY; Oh YW
Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3147-54. PubMed ID: 26662264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of dual-energy subtraction and electronic bone suppression combined with computer-aided detection on chest radiographs: effect on human observers' performance in nodule detection.
Szucs-Farkas Z; Schick A; Cullmann JL; Ebner L; Megyeri B; Vock P; Christe A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1006-13. PubMed ID: 23617482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of display luminance on the feature detection rates of masses in mammograms.
Hemminger BM; Dillon AW; Johnston RE; Muller KE; Deluca MC; Coffey CS; Pisano ED
Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2266-72. PubMed ID: 10587207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise.
Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Johnsson AA; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 15933088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography.
MacMahon H; Doi K; Sanada S; Montner SM; Giger ML; Metz CE; Nakamori N; Yin FF; Xu XW; Yonekawa H
Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):175-9. PubMed ID: 1984299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of monitor luminance change on observer performance for detection of abnormalities depicted on chest radiographs.
Ikeda M; Ishigaki T; Shimamoto K; Kodera Y; Koyama S; Usami H; Kato K
Invest Radiol; 2003 Jan; 38(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 12496522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Nondisplaced fractures: spatial resolution requirements for detection with digital skeletal imaging.
Murphey MD; Bramble JM; Cook LT; Martin NL; Dwyer SJ
Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):865-70. PubMed ID: 2305071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of a cathode-ray-tube and film for display of computed radiographic images.
Cook LT; Cox GG; Insana MF; McFadden MA; Hall TJ; Gaborski RS; Lure FY
Med Phys; 1998 Jul; 25(7 Pt 1):1132-8. PubMed ID: 9682198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of display type and room illuminance in chest radiographs.
Liukkonen E; Jartti A; Haapea M; Oikarinen H; Ahvenjärvi L; Mattila S; Nevala T; Palosaari K; Perhomaa M; Nieminen MT
Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3171-9. PubMed ID: 26662032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. ROC study of four LCD displays under typical medical center lighting conditions.
Langer S; Fetterly K; Mandrekar J; Harmsen S; Bartholmai B; Patton C; Bishop A; McCannel C
J Digit Imaging; 2006 Mar; 19(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 16249836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Usefulness of computer-aided diagnosis schemes for vertebral fractures and lung nodules on chest radiographs.
Kasai S; Li F; Shiraishi J; Doi K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):260-5. PubMed ID: 18562756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A preliminary study for exploring the luminance ratio of liquid-crystal displays required for display of radiographs.
Takarabe S; Morishita J; Yabuuchi H; Akamine H; Hashimoto N; Nakamura Y; Matsuo Y; Hattori A
Radiol Phys Technol; 2014 Jan; 7(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 24002707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Chest imaging with a selenium detector versus conventional film radiography: a CT-controlled study.
van Heesewijk HP; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Vos JA; Feldberg MA
Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):687-90. PubMed ID: 8756915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical evaluation of a medical high dynamic range display.
Marchessoux C; de Paepe L; Vanovermeire O; Albani L
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4023. PubMed ID: 27370121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The influence of liquid crystal display monitors on observer performance for the detection of interstitial lung markings on both storage phosphor and flat-panel-detector chest radiography.
Sung YM; Chung MJ; Lee KS; Choe BK
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 74(1):275-9. PubMed ID: 19304429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Digital Tomosynthesis, Dual-Energy Radiography, and Conventional Chest Radiography for the Detection and Management of Pulmonary Nodules.
Dobbins JT; McAdams HP; Sabol JM; Chakraborty DP; Kazerooni EA; Reddy GP; Vikgren J; Båth M
Radiology; 2017 Jan; 282(1):236-250. PubMed ID: 27439324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of film and monitor display luminance on observer performance and visual search.
Krupinski E; Roehrig H; Furukawa T
Acad Radiol; 1999 Jul; 6(7):411-8. PubMed ID: 10410166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Lung nodule detection in pediatric chest CT: quantitative relationship between image quality and radiologist performance.
Li X; Samei E; Barnhart HX; Gaca AM; Hollingsworth CL; Maxfield CM; Carrico CW; Colsher JG; Frush DP
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2609-18. PubMed ID: 21776798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
