These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29672092)

  • 1. From meaning to money: Translating injury into dollars.
    Hans VP; Helm RK; Reyna VF
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Apr; 42(2):95-109. PubMed ID: 29672092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Gist of Juries: Testing a Model of Damage Award Decision Making.
    Reyna VF; Hans VP; Corbin JC; Yeh R; Lin K; Royer C
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 2015 Aug; 21(3):280-294. PubMed ID: 29075092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The power of meaningful numbers: Attorney guidance and jury deliberation improve the reliability and gist validity of damage awards.
    Reed K; Hans VP; Rotenstein V; Helm RK; Rodriguez A; McKendall P; Reyna VF
    Law Hum Behav; 2024 Apr; 48(2):83-103. PubMed ID: 38602803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. All anchors are not created equal: the effects of Per Diem versus lump sum requests on pain and suffering awards.
    McAuliff BD; Bornstein BH
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Apr; 34(2):164-74. PubMed ID: 19462225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Separating compensatory and punitive damage award decisions by trial bifurcation.
    Shea Adams CM; Bourgeois MJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Feb; 30(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16729206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring damages for lost enjoyment of life: the view from the bench and the jury box.
    Poser S; Bornstein BH; McGorty EK
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Feb; 27(1):53-68. PubMed ID: 12647467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Impact of Clinical Diagnosis and Plaintiff's Award Request on Mock Juror Damage Awards and Injury Perceptions.
    Lecci L; Martin A
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(4):522-538. PubMed ID: 31984036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Jurors' use of standards of proof in decisions about punitive damages.
    Woody WD; Greene E
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(6):856-72. PubMed ID: 22829456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of harassment severity and organizational behavior on damage awards in a hostile work environment sexual harassment case.
    Cass SA; Levett LM; Kovera MB
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 19579260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Damage awards and jurors' responsibility ascriptions in medical versus automobile negligence cases.
    Vidmar N; Lee J; Cohen E; Stewart A
    Behav Sci Law; 1994; 12(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 10150702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can neuroimaging prove pain and suffering?: The influence of pain assessment techniques on legal judgments of physical versus emotional pain.
    Phalen HJ; Salerno JM; Schweitzer NJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Oct; 45(5):393-412. PubMed ID: 34871013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can Money Symbolize Acknowledgment? How Victims' Relatives Perceive Monetary Awards for Their Emotional Harm.
    Hulst L; Akkermans AJ
    Psychol Inj Law; 2011 Dec; 4(3-4):245-262. PubMed ID: 22348178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The consolidation of plaintiffs: the effects of number of plaintiffs on jurors' liability decisions, damage awards, and cognitive processing of evidence.
    Horowitz IA; Bordens KS
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Dec; 85(6):909-18. PubMed ID: 11125655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mock juror sampling issues in jury simulation research: A meta-analysis.
    Bornstein BH; Golding JM; Neuschatz J; Kimbrough C; Reed K; Magyarics C; Luecht K
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Feb; 41(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 27762572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of limiting punitive damage awards.
    Greene E; Coon D; Bornstein B
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Jun; 25(3):217-34. PubMed ID: 11480801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of malpractice claims due to spinal epidural abscess.
    DePasse JM; Ruttiman R; Eltorai AEM; Palumbo MA; Daniels AH
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):476-480. PubMed ID: 28498071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of judicial admonitions on hearsay evidence.
    Ho Lee D; Krauss DA; Lieberman J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2005; 28(6):589-603. PubMed ID: 16125775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stranger at the gate: the effect of the plaintiff's use of an interpreter on juror decision-making.
    Shuman DW; Stokes L; Martinez G
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):499-512. PubMed ID: 21618274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Explaining "pain and suffering" awards: the role of injury characteristics and fault attributions.
    Wissler RL; Evans DL; Hart AJ; Morry MM; Saks MJ
    Law Hum Behav; 1997 Apr; 21(2):181-207. PubMed ID: 9146102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of liability information, severity of injury, and attitudes toward vengeance on damage awards.
    Woody WD
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Feb; 102(1):239-58. PubMed ID: 18481684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.