These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29672118)

  • 1. The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention.
    Kinoshita S; Mills L; Norris D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1730-1742. PubMed ID: 29672118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The magic of words reconsidered: Investigating the automaticity of reading color-neutral words in the Stroop task.
    Kinoshita S; De Wit B; Norris D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Mar; 43(3):369-384. PubMed ID: 27656873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. You can't Stroop a lexical decision: is semantic processing fundamentally facilitative?
    Schmidt JR; Cheesman J; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 23205510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Common and specific loci of Stroop effects in vocal and manual tasks, revealed by event-related brain potentials and posthypnotic suggestions.
    Zahedi A; Abdel Rahman R; Stürmer B; Sommer W
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1575-1594. PubMed ID: 30730196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissociating stimulus-stimulus and response-response effects in the Stroop task.
    Schmidt JR; Cheesman J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Jun; 59(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 16035346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Further investigation of distinct components of Stroop interference and of their reduction by short response-stimulus intervals.
    Augustinova M; Silvert L; Spatola N; Ferrand L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():54-62. PubMed ID: 28407872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional constraints on semantic activation: Evidence from Stroop's paradigm.
    White D; Besner D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():4-11. PubMed ID: 27594342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective inhibition and naming performance in semantic blocking, picture-word interference, and color-word Stroop tasks.
    Shao Z; Roelofs A; Martin RC; Meyer AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1806-1820. PubMed ID: 26030631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The semantic Stroop effect: An ex-Gaussian analysis.
    White D; Risko EF; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1576-1581. PubMed ID: 26907601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stroop effects on redemption and semantic effects on confession: simultaneous automatic activation of embedded and carrier words.
    Iani C; Job R; Padovani R; Nicoletti R
    Cogn Process; 2009 Nov; 10(4):327-34. PubMed ID: 19301049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines.
    Lorentz E; McKibben T; Ekstrand C; Gould L; Anton K; Borowsky R
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():386. PubMed ID: 27014177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stroop-like effects in a new-code learning task: A cognitive load theory perspective.
    Hazan-Liran B; Miller P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1878-1891. PubMed ID: 27434675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modulation of conflicts in the Stroop effect.
    Shichel I; Tzelgov J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():93-102. PubMed ID: 29078981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention and facilitation: converging information versus inadvertent reading in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 20192539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Filling a gap in the semantic gradient: color associates and response set effects in the Stroop task.
    Risko EF; Schmidt JR; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Apr; 13(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 16893000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revisiting the automaticity of reading: Electrophysiological recordings show that stroop words capture spatial attention.
    Lowery A; McDonald JJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Feb; 152(2):309-321. PubMed ID: 35913878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; van der Meij R
    Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 1450():87-101. PubMed ID: 22424790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing stimulus-stimulus (semantic) conflict in the Stroop task using saccadic two-to-one color response mapping and preresponse pupillary measures.
    Hasshim N; Parris BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2601-10. PubMed ID: 26272367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Animacy and attentional processes: Evidence from the Stroop task.
    Bugaiska A; Grégoire L; Camblats AM; Gelin M; Méot A; Bonin P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):882-889. PubMed ID: 29716460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.