These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29672121)

  • 1. Validating semantic illusions: Competition between context and general world knowledge.
    Williams CR; Cook AE; O'Brien EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1414-1429. PubMed ID: 29672121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Getting real about semantic illusions: rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension.
    Brouwer H; Fitz H; Hoeks J
    Brain Res; 2012 Mar; 1446():127-43. PubMed ID: 22361114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Here's looking at you: Visual similarity exacerbates the Moses illusion for semantically similar celebrities.
    Davis DK; Abrams L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):75-90. PubMed ID: 26147668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Negative polarity illusions and the format of hierarchical encodings in memory.
    Parker D; Phillips C
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():321-339. PubMed ID: 27721173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Productive extension of semantic memory in school-aged children: Relations with reading comprehension and deployment of cognitive resources.
    Bauer PJ; Blue SN; Xu A; Esposito AG
    Dev Psychol; 2016 Jul; 52(7):1024-37. PubMed ID: 27253263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The contribution of fronto-parietal regions to sentence comprehension: insights from the Moses illusion.
    Raposo A; Marques JF
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():431-7. PubMed ID: 23796543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of semantic illusions independent of anomaly detection: evidence from eye movements.
    Cook AE; Walsh EK; Bills MAA; Kircher JC; O'Brien EJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Dec; ():1-11. PubMed ID: 27882856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rules and heuristics during sentence comprehension: evidence from a dual-task brain potential study.
    Martín-Loeches M; Schacht A; Casado P; Hohlfeld A; Abdel Rahman R; Sommer W
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 21(7):1365-79. PubMed ID: 18752393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing real-world violations embedded within a fantasy-world narrative.
    Walsh EK; Cook AE; O'Brien EJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2282-2294. PubMed ID: 30362400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Word associations are formed incidentally during sentential semantic integration.
    Prior A; Bentin S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 17367741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accessing distant premise information: how memory feeds reasoning.
    Lea RB; Mulligan EJ; Walton JL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):387-395. PubMed ID: 15910126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Questions versus statements: challenging an assumption about semantic illusions.
    Büttner AC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jun; 60(6):779-89. PubMed ID: 17514594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Constituent order and semantic parallelism in online comprehension: eye-tracking evidence from German.
    Knoeferle P; Crocker MW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2338-71. PubMed ID: 19418379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Processing of irregular polysemes in sentence reading.
    Brocher A; Foraker S; Koenig JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1798-1813. PubMed ID: 27065198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Access to prior spatial information.
    Smith ER; Stiegler-Balfour J; Williams CR; Walsh EK; O'Brien EJ
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1234-1248. PubMed ID: 32720265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading.
    Gordon PC; Hendrick R; Johnson M; Lee Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1304-21. PubMed ID: 17087585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Native and non-native reading of sentences: an fMRI experiment.
    Rüschemeyer SA; Zysset S; Friederici AD
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):354-65. PubMed ID: 16427323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in children's memory and reading comprehension: an investigation of semantic and inhibitory deficits.
    Cain K
    Memory; 2006 Jul; 14(5):553-69. PubMed ID: 16754241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.