These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2967274)

  • 1. Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences.
    Green CW; Reid DH; White LK; Halford RC; Brittain DP; Gardner SM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1988; 21(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 2967274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comprehensive evaluation of reinforcer identification processes for persons with profound multiple handicaps.
    Green CW; Reid DH; Canipe VS; Gardner SM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1991; 24(3):537-52. PubMed ID: 1836459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.
    Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hagopian LP; Bowman LG; Toole L
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 8881340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.
    Fisher W; Piazza CC; Bowman LG; Hagopian LP; Owens JC; Slevin I
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1992; 25(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 1634435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.
    Pace GM; Ivancic MT; Edwards GL; Iwata BA; Page TJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1985; 18(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 4044458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analyzing alertness among people with profound multiple disabilities: implications for provision of training.
    Green CW; Gardner SM; Canipe VS; Reid DH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(3):519-31. PubMed ID: 7928793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory reinforcement in profoundly retarded multiply handicapped children.
    Remington RE; Foxen T; Hogg J
    Am J Ment Defic; 1977 Nov; 82(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 145183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Teaching choice making during social interactions to students with profound multiple disabilities.
    Kennedy CH; Haring TG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 8473259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Defining, validating, and increasing indices of happiness among people with profound multiple disabilities.
    Green CW; Reid DH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 8881345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task variation versus task repetition for people with profound developmental disabilities: an assessment of preferences.
    Lancioni GE; O'Reilly MF; Campodonico F; Mantini M
    Res Dev Disabil; 1998; 19(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 9547529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of free-time contingencies as positive versus negative reinforcement.
    Zarcone JR; Fisher WW; Piazza CC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):247-50. PubMed ID: 8682741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers.
    Bowman LG; Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hagopian LP; Kogan JS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 9316258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selective auditory preferences and the use of automated equipment by severely, profoundly and multiply handicapped children.
    Glenn SM; Cunningham CC
    J Ment Defic Res; 1984 Dec; 28 ( Pt 4)():281-96. PubMed ID: 6241261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Training social skills to severely mentally retarded multiply handicapped adolescents.
    Matson JL; Manikam R; Coe D; Raymond K; Taras M; Long N
    Res Dev Disabil; 1988; 9(2):195-208. PubMed ID: 2970102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Piazza CC; Crosland K; Gotjen D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):423-38. PubMed ID: 9316257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Teaching individuals with profound multiple disabilities to access preferred stimuli with multiple microswitches.
    Tam GM; Phillips KJ; Mudford OC
    Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(6):2352-61. PubMed ID: 21824746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensory reinforcement in the mentally handicapped and autistic child: a review.
    Murphy G
    J Autism Dev Disord; 1982 Sep; 12(3):265-78. PubMed ID: 7153201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current limits to reinforcer identification for some persons with profound multiple disabilities.
    Ivancic MT; Bailey JS
    Res Dev Disabil; 1996; 17(1):77-92. PubMed ID: 8750077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Classical conditioning of profoundly retarded, multiply handicapped children.
    Hogg J; Remington RE; Foxen TH
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 1979 Dec; 21(6):779-86. PubMed ID: 160351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of pairing non-preferred staff with preferred stimuli on increasing the reinforcing value of non-preferred staff attention.
    Jerome J; Sturmey P
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Apr; 35(4):849-60. PubMed ID: 24508066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.