224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29672825)
1. Estimating success of vaginal birth after caesarean section in a regional Australian population: Validation of a prediction model.
Mooney SS; Hiscock R; Clarke ID; Craig S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Feb; 59(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 29672825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting vaginal birth after caesarean section: Validation of the Grobman model in a New Zealand population.
Windsor RS; Clark HE; Blasingame JLJ
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Oct; 62(5):658-663. PubMed ID: 35342928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of updated antenatal vaginal birth after caesarean section prediction model without race and ethnicity in Australia.
Liu CZ; Mahomed K
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Jun; 63(3):314-320. PubMed ID: 36259468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. French validation and adaptation of the Grobman nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Haumonte JB; Raylet M; Christophe M; Mauviel F; Bertrand A; Desbriere R; d'Ercole C
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 47(3):127-131. PubMed ID: 29229362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of a prediction model for predicting the probability of morbidity related to a trial of labour in Quebec.
Chaillet N; Bujold E; Dubé E; Grobman WA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2012 Sep; 34(9):820-825. PubMed ID: 22971449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after caesarean.
Chaillet N; Bujold E; Dubé E; Grobman WA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Feb; 35(2):119-124. PubMed ID: 23470060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting the success of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study in China.
Li YX; Bai Z; Long DJ; Wang HB; Wu YF; Reilly KH; Huang SR; Ji YJ
BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e027807. PubMed ID: 31129593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antenatal scoring system in predicting the success of planned vaginal birth following one previous caesarean section.
Kalok A; Zabil SA; Jamil MA; Lim PS; Shafiee MN; Kampan N; Shah SA; Mohamed Ismail NA
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Apr; 38(3):339-343. PubMed ID: 29017359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are There Differences between Women who Choose Elective Repeat Caesarean Versus Trial of Labour in St. John's, NL?
Groves P; Neveu J; Cook C; Murphy P; Crane JMG
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Jul; 40(7):903-909. PubMed ID: 29709454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.
Bonzon M; Gross MM; Karch A; Grylka-Baeschlin S
Midwifery; 2017 Jul; 50():219-227. PubMed ID: 28478374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Influencing factors and antenatal assessment of the vaginal birth after cesarean section].
Guo N; Bai RM; Qu PF; Huang P; He YP; Wang CL; Mi Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):369-374. PubMed ID: 31262120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mode of birth after caesarean section: individual prediction scores using Scottish population data.
Denham SH; Humphrey T; deLabrusse C; Dougall N
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Feb; 19(1):84. PubMed ID: 30819140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. External validation of a prediction model on vaginal birth after caesarean in a The Netherlands: a prospective cohort study.
Vankan E; van Kuijk SMJ; Nijhuis JG; Aardenburg R; Delemarre FMC; Dirksen CD; van Dooren IM; Kuppens SMI; Kwee A; Langenveld J; Schoorel EN; Smits LJ; Hermens RP; Scheepers HC
J Perinat Med; 2021 Mar; 49(3):357-363. PubMed ID: 33155996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trends in birth choices after caesarean section in Japan: A national survey examining information and access to vaginal birth after caesarean.
Torigoe I; Shorten B; Yoshida S; Shorten A
Midwifery; 2016 Jun; 37():49-56. PubMed ID: 27217237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preference of birth mode and postnatal health related quality of life after one previous caesarean section in three European countries.
Fobelets M; Beeckman K; Buyl R; Healy P; Grylka-Baeschlin S; Nicoletti J; Canepa M; Devane D; Gross MM; Morano S; Daly D; Begley C; Putman K
Midwifery; 2019 Dec; 79():102536. PubMed ID: 31561129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER A PREVIOUS CAESAREAN SECTION: CURRENT TRENDS AND OUTLOOK IN GHANA.
Seffah JD; Adu-Bonsaffoh K
J West Afr Coll Surg; 2014; 4(2):1-25. PubMed ID: 26587520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. External validation of prediction models for vaginal delivery after the trial of labour among women with previous one caesarean section - A cohort study.
Pegu B; Subburaj SP; Chaturvedula L; Sarkar S; Nair NS; Keepanasseril A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Dec; 291():10-15. PubMed ID: 37801782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of factors that predict the success rate of trial of labor after the cesarean section.
Mi Y; Qu P; Guo N; Bai R; Gao J; Ma Z; He Y; Wang C; Luo X
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jul; 21(1):527. PubMed ID: 34303355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections.
Tahseen S; Griffiths M
BJOG; 2010 Jan; 117(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 19781046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trial of labour and vaginal birth after previous caesarean section: A population based study of Eastern African immigrants in Victoria, Australia.
Belihu FB; Small R; Davey MA
Midwifery; 2017 Mar; 46():8-16. PubMed ID: 28104545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
