These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29673000)

  • 21. [Prognostic factors of pregnancy in intrauterine insemination].
    Barros Delgadillo JC; Rojas Ruiz JC; Molina Munguía AC; Villalobos Acosta S; Sánchez Solís V; Barroso Villa G; Gaviño Gaviño F
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2006 Dec; 74(12):611-25. PubMed ID: 17539317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prediction of pregnancy by intrauterine insemination using CASA estimates and strict criteria in patients with male factor infertility.
    Shibahara H; Obara H; Ayustawati ; Hirano Y; Suzuki T; Ohno A; Takamizawa S; Suzuki M
    Int J Androl; 2004 Apr; 27(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 15149462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluating the efficacy of ovulation stimulation with intrauterine insemination in women with diminished ovarian reserve compared to women with normal ovarian reserve.
    Kaleli S; Kervancıoğlu ME; Erol N; Alakbarova U; Akşahin E; Öçer İF
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Feb; 160(2):620-627. PubMed ID: 35780472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sperm motility is a major determinant of pregnancy outcome following intrauterine insemination.
    Shulman A; Hauser R; Lipitz S; Frenkel Y; Dor J; Bider D; Mashiach S; Yogev L; Yavetz H
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1998 Jul; 15(6):381-5. PubMed ID: 9673883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Longer time interval between semen processing and intrauterine insemination does not affect pregnancy outcome.
    Jansen CHJR; Elisen MGLM; Leenstra CW; Kaaijk EM; van Stralen KJ; Verhoeve HR
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Nov; 108(5):764-769. PubMed ID: 28923283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predictors of intrauterine insemination success.
    Zainul MR; Ong FB; Omar MH; Ng SP; Nurshaireen A; Rahimah MD; Mariam S; Zolaidah M; Sharifah-Teh NS; Saniros A; Hasnita B
    Med J Malaysia; 2006 Dec; 61(5):599-607. PubMed ID: 17623962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of sperm morphology on the likelihood of pregnancy after intrauterine insemination.
    Deveneau NE; Sinno O; Krause M; Eastwood D; Sandlow JI; Robb P; Granlund A; Strawn EY
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Dec; 102(6):1584-90.e2. PubMed ID: 25439801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative efficacy of density gradient and swim-up methods of semen preparation in intrauterine insemination cycles.
    Butt F; Chohan MA
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Aug; 66(8):932-7. PubMed ID: 27524522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Predictive value of the hemizona assay for pregnancy outcome in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with intrauterine insemination.
    Arslan M; Morshedi M; Arslan EO; Taylor S; Kanik A; Duran HE; Oehninger S
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jun; 85(6):1697-707. PubMed ID: 16682031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stepwise regression analysis to study male and female factors impacting on pregnancy rate in an intrauterine insemination programme.
    Montanaro Gauci M; Kruger TF; Coetzee K; Smith K; Van Der Merwe JP; Lombard CJ
    Andrologia; 2001 May; 33(3):135-41. PubMed ID: 11380328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of sperm parameters on intrauterine insemination pregnancy rate.
    Akram A; Imtiaz SA; Jahan S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Jun; 18(6):342-6. PubMed ID: 18760044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clarifying the relationship between total motile sperm counts and intrauterine insemination pregnancy rates.
    Muthigi A; Jahandideh S; Bishop LA; Naeemi FK; Shipley SK; O'Brien JE; Shin PR; Devine K; Tanrikut C
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Jun; 115(6):1454-1460. PubMed ID: 33610321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Analysis of clinical factors affecting pregnancy rate of intrauterine insemination].
    Xu YY; Wang HY; Qiao J; Liu P; Chen XN; Ma CH; Lin XG; Wang XF
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Dec; 45(6):887-91. PubMed ID: 24343068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How low is too low? Postwash total motile sperm count effect on pregnancy outcomes in intrauterine insemination.
    Mathes M; Kastrick E; Sayles H; Gustin S
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2023 Dec; 26(5):1108-1113. PubMed ID: 36357350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The impact of sperm morphology evaluated by strict criteria on intrauterine insemination success.
    Karabinus DS; Gelety TJ
    Fertil Steril; 1997 Mar; 67(3):536-41. PubMed ID: 9091343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Correlation between total sperm count and sperm motility and pregnancy rate in couples undergoing intrauterine insemination.
    Findeklee S; Radosa JC; Radosa MP; Hammadeh ME
    Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):7555. PubMed ID: 32371917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Factors predictive of clinical pregnancy in the first intrauterine insemination cycle of 306 couples with favourable female patient characteristics.
    Aydin Y; Hassa H; Oge T; Tokgoz VY
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2013 Dec; 16(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 24171641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the effect of the absence of sperm with rapid and linear progressive motility on subsequent pregnancy rates following intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization.
    Bollendorf A; Check JH; Lurie D
    J Androl; 1996; 17(5):550-7. PubMed ID: 8957699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of semen characteristics on the success of intrauterine insemination.
    Zhao Y; Vlahos N; Wyncott D; Petrella C; Garcia J; Zacur H; Wallach EE
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2004 May; 21(5):143-8. PubMed ID: 15279320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of semen characteristics on IUI combined with mild ovarian stimulation.
    Yalti S; Gürbüz B; Sezer H; Celik S
    Arch Androl; 2004; 50(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 15277001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.