407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29673946)
1. Subtyping the Risk of Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer for Active Surveillance Based on Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy.
Patel HD; Gupta M; Tosoian JJ; Carter HB; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1068-1074. PubMed ID: 29673946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?
Aghazadeh MA; Frankel J; Belanger M; McLaughlin T; Tortora J; Staff I; Wagner JR
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1196-1201. PubMed ID: 29288120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance.
Gearman DJ; Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Karnes RJ
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 29225057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Defining Prostate Cancer at Favorable Intermediate Risk: The Potential Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Genomic Tests.
Falagario UG; Beksac AT; Martini A; Cumarasamy S; Gupta A; Prasad S; Thulasidass H; Shah QN; Jayaratna I; Lewis S; Rastinehad AR; Taouli B; Cormio L; Carrieri G; Tewari AK
J Urol; 2019 Jul; 202(1):102-107. PubMed ID: 30730408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biopsy Core Features are Poor Predictors of Adverse Pathology in Men with Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer.
Audenet F; Vertosick EA; Fine SW; Sjoberg DD; Vickers AJ; Reuter VE; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Touijer KA
J Urol; 2018 Apr; 199(4):961-968. PubMed ID: 29030317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score as a Predictor of Adverse Pathology in Men on Active Surveillance.
Kornberg Z; Cooperberg MR; Cowan JE; Chan JM; Shinohara K; Simko JP; Tenggara I; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2019 Oct; 202(4):702-709. PubMed ID: 31026214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of a "low-risk" cohort of grade group 2 prostate cancer patients: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
McGinley KF; Sun X; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ
Int J Urol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):611-617. PubMed ID: 28589550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pathological Outcome following Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Prostate Specific Antigen Greater than 10 ng/ml and Histologically Favorable Risk Prostate Cancer.
Yu J; Kwon YS; Kim S; Han CS; Farber N; Kim J; Byun SS; Kim WJ; Jeon SS; Kim IY
J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1464-1470. PubMed ID: 26608903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Long-Term Risks of Metastases in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
Maggi M; Cowan JE; Fasulo V; Washington SL; Lonergan PE; Sciarra A; Nguyen HG; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1222-1228. PubMed ID: 33157570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adverse Pathologic Findings for Men Electing Immediate Radical Prostatectomy: Defining a Favorable Intermediate-Risk Group.
Patel HD; Tosoian JJ; Carter HB; Epstein JI
JAMA Oncol; 2018 Jan; 4(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 28715578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the Safety of Active Surveillance: Outcomes of Deferred Radical Prostatectomy after an Initial Period of Surveillance.
Balakrishnan AS; Cowan JE; Cooperberg MR; Shinohara K; Nguyen HG; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2019 Sep; 202(3):506-510. PubMed ID: 30958738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying Men Who Can Remain on Active Surveillance Despite Biopsy Reclassification to Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer.
Baraban E; Erak E; Fatima A; Akbari A; Zhao J; Fletcher SA; Bhanji Y; de la Calle CM; Mamawala M; Landis P; Macura KJ; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2023 Jul; 210(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 37042826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tumor Volume on Biopsy of Low Risk Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance.
Tosoian JJ; Mamawala M; Patel HD; Alam R; Epstein JI; Ross AE; Carter HB
J Urol; 2018 Apr; 199(4):954-960. PubMed ID: 29074222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-Term Outcomes after Deferred Radical Prostatectomy in Men Initially Treated with Active Surveillance.
Godtman RA; Schafferer M; Pihl CG; Stranne J; Hugosson J
J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):779-785. PubMed ID: 29730198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. African American Race is Not Associated with Risk of Reclassification during Active Surveillance: Results from the Canary Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Study.
Schenk JM; Newcomb LF; Zheng Y; Faino AV; Zhu K; Nyame YA; Brooks JD; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR; Dash A; Filson CP; Gleave ME; Liss M; Martin FM; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Lin DW
J Urol; 2020 Apr; 203(4):727-733. PubMed ID: 31651227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of Metabolic Syndrome on Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes at Radical Prostatectomy in a Low-risk Prostate Cancer Cohort Potentially Eligible for Active Surveillance.
Colicchia M; Morlacco A; Rangel LJ; Carlson RE; Dal Moro F; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 May; 5(3):425-432. PubMed ID: 29306730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Downgrading of grade group 2 intermediate-risk prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: Comparison of outcomes and predictors to identify potential candidates for active surveillance.
Su ZT; Patel HD; Epstein JI; Pavlovich CP; Allaf ME
Cancer; 2020 Apr; 126(8):1632-1639. PubMed ID: 32031685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selecting Patients with Favorable Risk, Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer for Active Surveillance-Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Have a Role?
Stonier T; Tin AL; Sjoberg DD; Jibara G; Vickers AJ; Fine S; Eastham J
J Urol; 2021 Apr; 205(4):1063-1068. PubMed ID: 33216696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
