195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29675387)
1. Comparison of optical quality after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser
Liu HT; Zhou Z; Luo WQ; He WJ; Agbedia O; Wang JX; Huang JZ; Gao X; Kong M; Li M; Li L
Int J Ophthalmol; 2018; 11(4):656-661. PubMed ID: 29675387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual performance after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia.
Igarashi A; Kamiya K; Shimizu K; Komatsu M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jul; 148(1):164-70.e1. PubMed ID: 19375059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia.
Kamiya K; Igarashi A; Shimizu K; Matsumura K; Komatsu M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 153(6):1178-86.e1. PubMed ID: 22365084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optical and visual quality comparison of implantable collamer lens and femtosecond laser assisted laser
Jiang Z; Wang H; Luo DQ; Chen J
Int J Ophthalmol; 2021; 14(5):737-743. PubMed ID: 34012890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of higher order aberrations after implantable Collamer Lens implantation and wavefront-guided LASEK in high myopia.
Shin JY; Ahn H; Seo KY; Kim EK; Kim TI
J Refract Surg; 2012 Feb; 28(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 22074464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the optical quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK for high myopia by OQAS and iTrace analyzer: a one-year retrospective study.
Yin Y; Lu Y; Xiang A; Fu Y; Zhao Y; Li Y; Hu T; Du K; Hu S; Fu Q; Wu X; Wen D
BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Aug; 21(1):292. PubMed ID: 34340669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Collamer toric implantable [corrected] contact lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopic astigmatism.
Kamiya K; Shimizu K; Igarashi A; Komatsu M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1687-93. PubMed ID: 18812119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implantable collamer lens and femtosecond laser for myopia: comparison using an adaptive optics visual simulator.
Pérez-Vives C; Albarrán-Diego C; García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2014 Apr; 77(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 25076475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Induced Higher-order aberrations after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Performed with Wavefront-Guided IntraLase Femtosecond Laser in moderate to high Astigmatism.
Al-Zeraid FM; Osuagwu UL
BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar; 16():29. PubMed ID: 27000109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optical and visual quality comparison of implantable Collamer lens and laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia using an adaptive optics visual simulator.
Pérez-Vives C; Dominguez-Vicent A; García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jul; ():0. PubMed ID: 22865405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optical quality of the Visian Implantable Collamer Lens for different refractive powers.
Pérez-Vives C; Domínguez-Vicent A; Ferrer-Blasco T; Pons ÁM; Montés-Micó R
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 May; 251(5):1423-9. PubMed ID: 23142994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy and Safety of Hole Implantable Collamer Lens in Comparison with Original Implantable Collamer Lens in Patients with Moderate to High Myopia.
Naripthaphan P; Pachimkul P; Chantra S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2017 Feb; 100 Suppl 1():S48-55. PubMed ID: 29927184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optical and visual simulation of standard and modified spherical aberration implantable Collamer lens post myopic LASIK surgery.
Pérez-Vives C; Belda-Salmerón L; García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2014; 24(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 24057938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of visual performance between conventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration.
Zhang J; Zhou YH; Wang NL; Li R
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Jan; 121(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 18272040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of visual acuity and higher-order aberrations after standard and wavefront-guided myopic femtosecond LASIK].
Anderle R; Ventruba J; Š S
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2015 Jan; 71(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 25959784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of postoperative optical quality according to the degree of decentering of V4c implantable collamer lens.
Park MJ; Jeon HM; Lee KH; Han SY
Int J Ophthalmol; 2017; 10(4):619-623. PubMed ID: 28503437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of accommodation and accommodative micro-fluctuation after implantable collamer lens and LASIK surgery for myopia.
Li L; Zhang B; Wang Z
BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 22(1):8. PubMed ID: 34983448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study of objective visual quality between FS-LASIK and SMART in myopia.
Wu Y; Huang Y; Wang SH; Wang GQ; Yu AM; Zhao SZ; Wei RH; Yang RB; Zhang C
Int J Ophthalmol; 2022; 15(3):502-509. PubMed ID: 35310064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optical quality after posterior chamber Phakic implantation of an intraocular Lens with a central hole (V4c implantable Collamer Lens) under different lighting conditions.
He T; Zhu Y; Zhou J
BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):82. PubMed ID: 32131800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective comparison of phakic collamer lenses and wavefront-optimized laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia.
Parkhurst GD
Clin Ophthalmol; 2016; 10():1209-15. PubMed ID: 27418804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
