195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29675387)
21. Comparison of implantable collamer lens (ICL) and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for low myopia.
Sanders D; Vukich JA
Cornea; 2006 Dec; 25(10):1139-46. PubMed ID: 17172886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
Chung SH; Lee IS; Lee YG; Lee HK; Kim EK; Yoon G; Seo KY
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 16765794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical evaluation of optical quality and intraocular scattering after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation.
Kamiya K; Shimizu K; Igarashi A; Kobashi H; Ishii R; Sato N
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 May; 53(6):3161-6. PubMed ID: 22661546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Three-year results of small incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided femtosecond laser-assisted laser
Xia LK; Ma J; Liu HN; Shi C; Huang Q
Int J Ophthalmol; 2018; 11(3):470-477. PubMed ID: 29600182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Wavefront-guided LASIK with the Zyoptix 3.1 system for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism with 1-year follow-up: clinical outcome and change in higher order aberrations.
Kohnen T; Bühren J; Kühne C; Mirshahi A
Ophthalmology; 2004 Dec; 111(12):2175-85. PubMed ID: 15582071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of visual acuity, higher-order aberrations and corneal asphericity after refractive lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for myopia.
Kamiya K; Shimizu K; Igarashi A; Kobashi H; Komatsu M
Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 97(8):968-75. PubMed ID: 23269682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Comparison of clinical results between LASIK method and ICL implantation in high myopia].
Hrubá H; Vlková E; Horácková M; Svacinová J
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2004 May; 60(3):180-91. PubMed ID: 15307652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Visual acuity and higher-order aberrations with wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis.
Perez-Straziota CE; Randleman JB; Stulting RD
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Mar; 36(3):437-41. PubMed ID: 20202542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Factors affecting the change in lower-order and higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia with the Zyoptix 3.1 system.
Bühren J; Kohnen T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jul; 32(7):1166-74. PubMed ID: 16857504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of choroidal thickness in high myopic eyes after FS-LASIK versus implantable collamer lens implantation with swept-source optical coherence tomography.
Zhang J; He FL; Liu Y; Fan XQ
Int J Ophthalmol; 2020; 13(5):773-781. PubMed ID: 32420225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Higher Order Aberrations after Wavefront-guided LASIK and PRK: One Year Follow-Up Results.
Jahadi Hosseini SH; Abtahi SM; Khalili MR
J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2016; 11(4):350-357. PubMed ID: 27994802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of pupil and optical zone diameter on higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided myopic LASIK.
Bühren J; Kühne C; Kohnen T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Dec; 31(12):2272-80. PubMed ID: 16473217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Outcomes of topography-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia in virgin eyes.
Jain AK; Malhotra C; Pasari A; Kumar P; Moshirfar M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1302-1311. PubMed ID: 27697248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Postoperative efficacy, safety, predictability, and visual quality of implantable collamer lens implantation versus small incision lenticule extraction in myopic eyes: a Meta-analysis.
Li HY; Ye Z; Li ZH
Int J Ophthalmol; 2023; 16(3):442-452. PubMed ID: 36935780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of optical quality and intraocular scattering after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole (Hole ICL and Conventional ICL) implantation using the double-pass instrument.
Kamiya K; Shimizu K; Saito A; Igarashi A; Kobashi H
PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e66846. PubMed ID: 23825575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of corneal wavefront aberrations on corneal pseudoaccommodation.
Yeu E; Wang L; Koch DD
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):972-981.e2. PubMed ID: 22317915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparing the Early Changes in Classified Higher-Order Aberrations Before and After Non-Toric and Toric Implantable Collamer Lens V4c Implantation.
Lin IC; Chen X; Cheng M; Miao H; Li B; Jiang Y; Lei Y; Xu Y; Wang X; Zhou X
Curr Eye Res; 2024 Jun; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 38913085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Functional optical zone after wavefront-optimized versus wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
Elshawarby MA; Saad A; Helmy T; Seleet MM; Elraggal T
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol; 2021; 10(3):129-137. PubMed ID: 37641710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of ocular aberrations measured by a Fourier-based Hartmann-Shack and Zernike-based Tscherning aberrometer before and after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Sáles CS; Manche EE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1820-5. PubMed ID: 26603389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
Tran DB; Sarayba MA; Bor Z; Garufis C; Duh YJ; Soltes CR; Juhasz T; Kurtz RM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 15721701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
