These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29676023)

  • 1. Estimating the variance for heterogeneity in arm-based network meta-analysis.
    Piepho HP; Madden LV; Roger J; Payne R; Williams ER
    Pharm Stat; 2018 May; 17(3):264-277. PubMed ID: 29676023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data.
    Ju K; Lin L; Chu H; Cheng LL; Xu C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 32539721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of analytic approaches for individual patient data meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Thomas D; Platt R; Benedetti A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):28. PubMed ID: 28202011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modelling spatial disease rates using maximum likelihood.
    Leroux BG
    Stat Med; 2000 Sep 15-30; 19(17-18):2321-32. PubMed ID: 10960856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A REML method for the evidence-splitting model in network meta-analysis.
    Piepho HP; Forkman J; Malik WA
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 Mar; 15(2):198-212. PubMed ID: 38037262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation using penalized quasilikelihood and quasi-pseudo-likelihood in Poisson mixed models.
    Lin X
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2007 Dec; 13(4):533-44. PubMed ID: 18080833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis of binary outcomes via generalized linear mixed models: a simulation study.
    Bakbergenuly I; Kulinskaya E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):70. PubMed ID: 29973146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generalized quasi-linear mixed-effects model.
    Saigusa Y; Eguchi S; Komori O
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Jul; 31(7):1280-1291. PubMed ID: 35286226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bias reduction in logistic dose-response models.
    Wagler A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 21442516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Permutation-based variance component test in generalized linear mixed model with application to multilocus genetic association study.
    Zeng P; Zhao Y; Li H; Wang T; Chen F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():37. PubMed ID: 25897803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An assessment of estimation methods for generalized linear mixed models with binary outcomes.
    Capanu M; Gönen M; Begg CB
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(26):4550-66. PubMed ID: 23839712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of breeding values for mean and dispersion, their variance and correlation using double hierarchical generalized linear models.
    Felleki M; Lee D; Lee Y; Gilmour AR; Rönnegård L
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Dec; 94(6):307-17. PubMed ID: 23374241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating trial and treatment heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta-analysis of survival data by means of the penalized maximum likelihood approach.
    Rondeau V; Michiels S; Liquet B; Pignon JP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1894-910. PubMed ID: 18069745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Paule-Mandel estimators for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
    Jackson D; Veroniki AA; Law M; Tricco AC; Baker R
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):416-434. PubMed ID: 28585257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A nondegenerate penalized likelihood estimator for variance parameters in multilevel models.
    Chung Y; Rabe-Hesketh S; Dorie V; Gelman A; Liu J
    Psychometrika; 2013 Oct; 78(4):685-709. PubMed ID: 24092484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bartlett-type corrections and bootstrap adjustments of likelihood-based inference methods for network meta-analysis.
    Noma H; Nagashima K; Maruo K; Gosho M; Furukawa TA
    Stat Med; 2018 Mar; 37(7):1178-1190. PubMed ID: 29250816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimating uncertainty of parameters in linear mixed-effects models.
    Thai HT; Mentré F; Holford NH; Veyrat-Follet C; Comets E
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):129-40. PubMed ID: 23457061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adjusted closed-form confidence interval formulas for network meta-analysis with a small number of studies.
    Kojima M
    Stat Med; 2023 Feb; 42(4):457-469. PubMed ID: 36539211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multilevel models for survival analysis with random effects.
    Yau KK
    Biometrics; 2001 Mar; 57(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 11252624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.