666 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29676495)
1. Insanity defense typology.
Brown KP
Behav Sci Law; 2018 May; 36(3):317-324. PubMed ID: 29676495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preliminary examination of an insanity defense typology: Prevalence rates and correlates.
Brown KP; Wood ME
Behav Sci Law; 2021 Dec; 39(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 34169562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Structured instruments for insanity defense evaluations: Opportunities and limitations.
Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Meynen G; Ferracuti S
Behav Sci Law; 2023; 41(5):432-444. PubMed ID: 36938899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Discerning bias in forensic psychological reports in insanity cases.
Neal TMS
Behav Sci Law; 2018 May; 36(3):325-338. PubMed ID: 29672912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Overlapping universe: understanding legal insanity and psychosis.
Torry ZD; Billick SB
Psychiatr Q; 2010 Sep; 81(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 20373024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are symptoms assessed differently for schizophrenia and other psychoses in legal insanity evaluations of violent crimes?
Løvgren PJ; Laake P; Narud K; Reitan SK; Bjørkly S
BMC Psychiatry; 2023 Jul; 23(1):487. PubMed ID: 37420230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The military insanity defense.
Lande RG
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 1873574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Insanity findings and evaluation practices: A state-wide review of court-ordered reports.
O Gardner B; C Murrie D; N Torres A
Behav Sci Law; 2018 May; 36(3):303-316. PubMed ID: 29722059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Free will, neuroscience, and choice: towards a decisional capacity model for insanity defense evaluations.
Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Meynen G; Tarsitani L; Biondi M; Ferracuti S
Riv Psichiatr; 2017; 52(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 28287192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a new instrument to guide and support insanity evaluations: the defendant's insanity assessment support scale (DIASS).
Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Roma P; Ferracuti S
Transl Psychiatry; 2022 Mar; 12(1):115. PubMed ID: 35318308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maintenance of an insanity defense under Montana's "abolition" of the insanity defense.
Steadman HJ; Callahan LA; Robbins PC; Morrissey JP
Am J Psychiatry; 1989 Mar; 146(3):357-60. PubMed ID: 2919693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How reliable are forensic evaluations of legal sanity?
Gowensmith WN; Murrie DC; Boccaccini MT
Law Hum Behav; 2013 Apr; 37(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 22775304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychosis and Substance Use: Implications for Conditional Release Readiness Evaluations.
Tabernik HE; Vitacco MJ
Behav Sci Law; 2016 Mar; 34(2-3):295-307. PubMed ID: 27021306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recasting Florida's insanity defense. Two modest proposals.
Miller EC
J Fla Med Assoc; 1993 Oct; 80(10):684-8. PubMed ID: 8270901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Settled Insanity: Substance Use Meets the Insanity Defense.
Appelbaum PS
Psychiatr Serv; 2022 Jan; 73(1):105-107. PubMed ID: 34555920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Insanity, methamphetamine and psychiatric expertise in New Zealand courtrooms.
Thom K; Finlayson M; McKenna B
J Law Med; 2011 Jun; 18(4):749-58. PubMed ID: 21774272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Criminal insanity in Bulgaria and Norway: Analysing the prospect of a common approach.
Gröning L; Dimitrova S
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2023; 87():101866. PubMed ID: 36724723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of forensic psychiatry and the insanity defense.
Schell-King M; Finneran MR
Perspect Psychiatr Care; 1982; 20(2):54-64. PubMed ID: 6923186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence of gender bias in legal insanity evaluations: a case vignette study of clinicians, judges and students.
Yourstone J; Lindholm T; Grann M; Svenson O
Nord J Psychiatry; 2008; 62(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 18720232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
