These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29676598)
1. Modernising speech audiometry: using a smartphone application to test word recognition. van Zyl M; Swanepoel W; Myburgh HC Int J Audiol; 2018 Aug; 57(8):561-569. PubMed ID: 29676598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and validation of a smartphone-based digits-in-noise hearing test in South African English. Potgieter JM; Swanepoel de W; Myburgh HC; Hopper TC; Smits C Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 27121117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated smartphone audiometry: Validation of a word recognition test app. Dewyer NA; Jiradejvong P; Henderson Sabes J; Limb CJ Laryngoscope; 2018 Mar; 128(3):707-712. PubMed ID: 28543040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The development of the University of Jordan word recognition test. Garadat SN; Abdulbaqi KJ; Haj-Tas MA Int J Audiol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):424-430. PubMed ID: 28332432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Smartphone threshold audiometry in underserved primary health-care contexts. Sandström J; Swanepoel de W; Carel Myburgh H; Laurent C Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 26795898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A study of recorded versus live voice word recognition. Mendel LL; Owen SR Int J Audiol; 2011 Oct; 50(10):688-93. PubMed ID: 21812631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Smartphone-Facilitated In-Situ Hearing Aid Audiometry for Community-Based Hearing Testing. Frisby C; De Sousa KC; Eikelboom RH; Mahomed-Asmail F; Moore DR; de Kock T; Manchaiah V; Swanepoel W Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):1019-1032. PubMed ID: 38424667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Multicenter Validity Study of Four Smartphone Hearing Test Apps in Optimized and Home Environments. Swords C; Twumasi E; Fitzgerald M; Fitzsimons-West E; Luo M; Dunne H; Lim KH; Jones O; Law S; Myuran T; Smith G; Tailor BV; Wakelam O; de Cates C; Borsetto D; Tysome J; Donnelly N; Axon P; Bance M; Smith ME Laryngoscope; 2024 Jun; 134(6):2864-2870. PubMed ID: 38214403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are smartphone applications (App) useful to improve hearing? Martinez-Beneyto P; Franchella S; Alonso Rodriguez F; Navarro-Velasquez R; Martinez-Beneito MA; Martini A; Marco Algarra J Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2020 Aug; 40(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 32519992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of an internet-based speech-in-noise screening test for school-age children. Sheikh Rashid M; Dreschler WA; de Laat JAPM Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):967-975. PubMed ID: 28936876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychometrically equivalent Russian speech audiometry materials by male and female talkers. Harris RW; Nissen SL; Pola MG; McPherson DL; Tavartkiladze GA; Eggett DL Int J Audiol; 2007 Jan; 46(1):47-66. PubMed ID: 17365055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monitoring Hearing in an Infectious Disease Clinic with mHealth Technologies. Brittz M; Heinze B; Mahomed-Asmail F; Swanepoel W; Stoltz A J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jun; 30(6):482-492. PubMed ID: 30461403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation and test-retest reliability of the IHR-McCormick Automated Toy Discrimination Test. Summerfield Q; Palmer AR; Foster JR; Marshall DH; Twomey T Br J Audiol; 1994 Jun; 28(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 7841901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The development of psychometrically equivalent Cantonese speech audiometry materials. Nissen SL; Harris RW; Channell RW; Conklin B; Kim M; Wong L Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 21319936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptation of the STARR test for adult Italian population: A speech test for a realistic estimate in real-life listening conditions. Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; De Seta E; Musacchio A; Mancini P Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):262-7. PubMed ID: 26795710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating a smartphone digits-in-noise test as part of the audiometric test battery. Potgieter JM; Swanepoel W; Smits C S Afr J Commun Disord; 2018 May; 65(1):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29781704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance norms for the VA compact disc versions of CID W-22 (Hirsh) and PB-50 (Rush Hughes) word lists. Heckendorf AL; Wiley TL; Wilson RH J Am Acad Audiol; 1997 Jun; 8(3):163-72. PubMed ID: 9188073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reference sound pressure level for Korean speech audiometry. Han H; Lee J; Cho S; Kim J; Lee K; Choi WD Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 21047297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss. Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech-in-noise measures: variable versus fixed speech and noise levels. Wilson RH; McArdle R Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 22640687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]