These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 296767)

  • 1. A comparison of digital brush and conventional toothbrush effectiveness on plaque removal in preschool children.
    Faunce FR; Garnick JJ
    J Pedod; 1979; 3(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 296767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparative effectiveness of the Interplak electric rotary toothbrush].
    De Beule F; Bercy P
    J Parodontol; 1990 Feb; 9(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 2384876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A clinical comparison of two electric toothbrushes with different mechanical actions.
    Ciancio SG; Mather ML
    Clin Prev Dent; 1990; 12(3):5-7. PubMed ID: 2083477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of new and 3-month-old brush heads in the removal of plaque using a powered toothbrush.
    Hogan LM; Daly CG; Curtis BH
    J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Feb; 34(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 17309587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A six-week study comparing the efficacy of a rotary electric toothbrush with a conventional toothbrush.
    Silverstone LM; Tilliss TS; Cross-Poline GN; Van der Linden E; Stach DJ; Featherstone MJ
    Clin Prev Dent; 1992; 14(2):29-34. PubMed ID: 1499245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of an electric toothbrush on plaque removal in periodontal patients.
    Howorko N; Gutek M; Naidoo S; Hoover JN
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 8329164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of plaque removal effectiveness of an electric versus a manual toothbrush in children.
    Jongenelis AP; Wiedemann W
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(3):176-82, 165. PubMed ID: 9262798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A thirty-day evaluation of the Rowenta Dentiphant powered toothbrush in children for safety and efficacy.
    Yankell SL; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):96-100. PubMed ID: 9238885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of powered and manual toothbrushes for plaque removal by 4- to 5-year-old children.
    Silverman J; Rosivack RG; Matheson PB; Houpt MI
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 15185803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The curved-bristle toothbrush: an aid for the handicapped population.
    Williams NJ; Schuman NJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(4):291-3. PubMed ID: 2970481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effectiveness of plaque removal--toothbrush/chewing stick].
    List T
    Tandlakartidningen; 1985 May; 77(10):562-5. PubMed ID: 3865435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of the plaque removal ability of .007 and .008 toothbrush bristles.
    Beatty CF; Fallon PA; Marshall DD
    Clin Prev Dent; 1990 Dec; 12(5):22-7. PubMed ID: 2095314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of a battery-powered toothbrush on plaque removal: comparison with four manual toothbrushes.
    Bustillo E; Cartwright S; Battista GW; Petrone DM; Petrone ME; Rustogi KN; Chaknis P; Volpe AR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 2000; (31):S25-9 quiz S35. PubMed ID: 11908372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative efficacy of a new battery-powered toothbrush and a commercially available manual toothbrush on the removal of established supragingival plaque: a single-use crossover study in adults.
    Singh S; Rustogi KN; Chaknis P; Petrone ME; DeVizio W; Proskin HM
    J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 16170978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative clinical study in plaque removal efficacy of a new sonic toothbrush (Float-Brush) with floating bristle action.
    Ojima M; Shizukuishi S; Matsuo T; Kanesaki N; Hanioka T
    J Clin Dent; 2003; 14(2):42-4. PubMed ID: 12723103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dental plaque removal in adults using a newly developed, 'Concept 45 degrees' toothbrush.
    Kanchanakamol U; Srisilapanan P; Umpriwan R; Kongmalai A
    Int Dent J; 1993 Apr; 43(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 8320004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A split-mouth comparison of a three-dimensional-action electric toothbrush and a high-frequency electric toothbrush for reducing plaque and gingivitis.
    Putt MS; Milleman JL; Davidson KR; Kleber CJ; Cugini M
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 3(4):95-103. PubMed ID: 12666948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A combined analysis of a toothbrush, foam brush, and a chlorhexidine-soaked foam brush in maintaining oral hygiene.
    Ransier A; Epstein JB; Lunn R; Spinelli J
    Cancer Nurs; 1995 Oct; 18(5):393-6. PubMed ID: 7585494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.
    Sowinski J; Petrone DM; Wachs GN; Chaknis P; Kemp J; Sprosta AA; Devizio W
    Am J Dent; 2008 Dec; 21(6):339-45. PubMed ID: 19146124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oral hygiene regimens, plaque control, and gingival health: a two-month clinical trial with antimicrobial agents.
    Biesbrock AR; Bartizek RD; Gerlach RW; Terézhalmy GT
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(4):101-5. PubMed ID: 18277739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.