These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29677328)

  • 1. The Auckland Optotypes: An open-access pictogram set for measuring recognition acuity.
    Hamm LM; Yeoman JP; Anstice N; Dakin SC
    J Vis; 2018 Mar; 18(3):13. PubMed ID: 29677328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognition acuity in children measured using The Auckland Optotypes.
    Hamm LM; Anstice NS; Black JM; Dakin SC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Nov; 38(6):596-608. PubMed ID: 30575072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crowding and visual acuity measured in adults using paediatric test letters, pictures and symbols.
    Lalor SJH; Formankiewicz MA; Waugh SJ
    Vision Res; 2016 Apr; 121():31-38. PubMed ID: 26878696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of simulated refractive error on adult visual acuity for paediatric tests.
    Paudel N; Jacobs RJ; Sloan R; Denny S; Shea K; Thompson B; Anstice N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 28656671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.
    Anstice NS; Jacobs RJ; Simkin SK; Thomson M; Thompson B; Collins AV
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170839. PubMed ID: 28152076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resolution acuity versus recognition acuity with Landolt-style optotypes.
    Heinrich SP; Bach M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Sep; 251(9):2235-41. PubMed ID: 23828648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of optotypes of Amsterdam Picture Chart with those of Tumbling-E, LEA symbols, ETDRS, and Landolt-C in non-amblyopic and amblyopic patients.
    Engin O; Despriet DD; van der Meulen-Schot HM; Romers A; Slot X; Sang MT; Fronius M; Kelderman H; Simonsz HJ
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 252(12):2013-20. PubMed ID: 25228066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repeatability of an automated Landolt C test, compared with the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart testing.
    Ruamviboonsuk P; Tiensuwan M; Kunawut C; Masayaanon P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 136(4):662-9. PubMed ID: 14516806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling acuity for optotypes varying in complexity.
    Watson AB; Ahumada AJ
    J Vis; 2012 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 23024356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Construction and Validation of LEA Hindi Chart: A Multicenter Study.
    Datta S; Varadharajan S; Mazumdar D; Narayanan A; Monira S; Panda S; Hyvärinen L; Satgunam P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):351-359. PubMed ID: 32413007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Correlation of letter optotypes with Landholt ring for different degrees of visual acuity].
    Rassow B; Wang Y
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1999 Aug; 215(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 10483562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New visual acuity chart: modification for clinical practice and research.
    Pisarnkorskul P; Singhkuna L
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Mar; 86(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 12757065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Patti Pics and Lea Symbols optotypes in children and adults.
    Mercer ME; Drover JR; Penney KJ; Courage ML; Adams RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Mar; 90(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 23376895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A modified ETDRS visual acuity chart for European-wide use.
    Plainis S; Tzatzala P; Orphanos Y; Tsilimbaris MK
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):647-53. PubMed ID: 17632314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of visual acuity measurement with Landolt rings versus numbers].
    Rohrschneider K; Spittler AR; Bach M
    Ophthalmologe; 2019 Nov; 116(11):1058-1063. PubMed ID: 30927070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF VISUAL ACUITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN STANDARD EARLY TREATMENT DIABETIC RETINOPATHY STUDY CHART AND A HANDHELD EQUIVALENT IN EYES WITH RETINAL PATHOLOGY.
    Rahimy E; Reddy S; DeCroos FC; Khan MA; Boyer DS; Gupta OP; Regillo CD; Haller JA
    Retina; 2015 Aug; 35(8):1680-7. PubMed ID: 25719987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of scoring and termination rules on test-retest variability of a novel high-pass letter acuity chart.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Whitaker HL; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 55(3):1386-92. PubMed ID: 24519424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation of optotypes with the Landolt ring--a fresh look at the comparability of optotypes.
    Grimm W; Rassow B; Wesemann W; Saur K; Hilz R
    Optom Vis Sci; 1994 Jan; 71(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8146001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual acuity as measured with Landolt C chart and Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
    Kuo HK; Kuo MT; Tiong IS; Wu PC; Chen YJ; Chen CH
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Apr; 249(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 20658145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential visual acuity - A new approach to measuring visual acuity.
    Leat SJ; Yakobchuk-Stanger C; Irving EL
    J Optom; 2020; 13(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 31078445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.