These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29677328)

  • 21. Effect of optical defocus on detection and recognition of vanishing optotype letters in the fovea and periphery.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7063-70. PubMed ID: 22969070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Comparison of visual acuity measured using Landolt-C and ETDRS charts in healthy subjects and patients with various eye diseases].
    Becker R; Teichler G; Gräf M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2011 Oct; 228(10):864-7. PubMed ID: 21997822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visual Acuity Testing Using a Random Method Visual Acuity Application.
    Rhiu S; Lee HJ; Goo YS; Cho K; Kim JH
    Telemed J E Health; 2016 Mar; 22(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 26280910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of Visual Acuity in Children Using Crowded Lea Symbol Charts.
    Sailoganathan A; Rou LX; Buja KA; Siderov J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Aug; 95(8):643-647. PubMed ID: 30063661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessing visual acuity across five disease types: ETDRS charts are faster with clinical outcome comparable to Landolt Cs.
    Koenig S; Tonagel F; Schiefer U; Bach M; Heinrich SP
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 252(7):1093-9. PubMed ID: 24867313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Correlation-based evaluation of visual performance to reduce the statistical error of visual acuity.
    Fülep C; Kovács I; Kránitz K; Erdei G
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2017 Jul; 34(7):1255-1264. PubMed ID: 29036136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Different trajectories in the development of visual acuity with different levels of crowding: The Milan Eye Chart (MEC).
    Facchin A; Maffioletti S; Martelli M; Daini R
    Vision Res; 2019 Mar; 156():10-16. PubMed ID: 30639454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Validation of an Automated Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Low-contrast Letter Acuity Test.
    Pang Y; Sparschu L; Nylin E; Wang J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):370-376. PubMed ID: 32413009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computer monitor pixellation and Landolt C visual acuity.
    Carkeet A; Lister L; Goh YT
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 Nov; 41(6):1176-1182. PubMed ID: 34533231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of visual acuity charts in young adults and patients with diabetic retinopathy.
    Plainis S; Kontadakis G; Feloni E; Giannakopoulou T; Tsilimbaris MK; Pallikaris IG; Moschandreas J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 90(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 23314130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Differences between recognition and resolution acuity in patients undergoing macular hole surgery.
    Wittich W; Overbury O; Kapusta MA; Watanabe DH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3690-4. PubMed ID: 16877444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preliminary report: examination of young children with Lea symbols.
    Becker RH; Hübsch SH; Gräf MH; Kaufmann H
    Strabismus; 2000 Sep; 8(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11035563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Vanishing Optotype acuity: repeatability and effect of the number of alternatives.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Redmond T; Anderson RS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2011 Jan; 31(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 21158882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing LEA numbers low vision book and Feinbloom visual acuity charts.
    Hardgrave N; Hatley J; Lewerenz D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Nov; 89(11):1611-8. PubMed ID: 23026789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of response biases on resolution thresholds of Sloan letters in central and paracentral vision.
    Barhoom H; Joshi MR; Schmidtmann G
    Vision Res; 2021 Oct; 187():110-119. PubMed ID: 34252726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of visual acuity measured with Allen figures and Snellen letters using the B-VAT II monitor.
    Lueder GT; Garibaldi D
    Ophthalmology; 1997 Nov; 104(11):1758-61. PubMed ID: 9373103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Computer-based test to measure optimal visual acuity in age-related macular degeneration.
    González EG; Tarita-Nistor L; Markowitz SN; Steinbach MJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4838-45. PubMed ID: 17898311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Adult discrimination performance for pediatric acuity test optotypes.
    Candy TR; Mishoulam SR; Nosofsky RM; Dobson V
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 52(7):4307-13. PubMed ID: 21436270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Landolt C and snellen e acuity: differences in strabismus amblyopia?].
    Becker R; Gräf M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Jan; 223(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 16418930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparison of the Lithander (Kolt test) pediatric visual acuity test with the standardized Landolt ring test].
    Cavazos H; Schulz E; Rassow B; Wesemann W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Oct; 197(4):324-8. PubMed ID: 2280568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.