These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
45. Long distance relationships: enhancer-promoter communication and dynamic gene transcription. Marsman J; Horsfield JA Biochim Biophys Acta; 2012; 1819(11-12):1217-27. PubMed ID: 23124110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The Mcp element mediates stable long-range chromosome-chromosome interactions in Drosophila. Vazquez J; Müller M; Pirrotta V; Sedat JW Mol Biol Cell; 2006 May; 17(5):2158-65. PubMed ID: 16495335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The gypsy insulator can function as a promoter-specific silencer in the Drosophila embryo. Cai HN; Levine M EMBO J; 1997 Apr; 16(7):1732-41. PubMed ID: 9130717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Long-distance interactions between enhancers and promoters. Sipos L; Gyurkovics H FEBS J; 2005 Jul; 272(13):3253-9. PubMed ID: 15978032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Enhancer-promoter communication mediated by Chip during Pannier-driven proneural patterning is regulated by Osa. Heitzler P; Vanolst L; Biryukova I; Ramain P Genes Dev; 2003 Mar; 17(5):591-6. PubMed ID: 12629041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The regulation of enhancer-promoter interactions in the Drosophila embryo. Zhou J; Cai HN; Ohtsuki S; Levine M Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 1997; 62():307-12. PubMed ID: 9598364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. One thousand and one ways of making functionally similar transcriptional enhancers. Veitia RA Bioessays; 2008 Nov; 30(11-12):1052-7. PubMed ID: 18937349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. DNA looping induced by a transcriptional enhancer in vivo. Petrascheck M; Escher D; Mahmoudi T; Verrijzer CP; Schaffner W; Barberis A Nucleic Acids Res; 2005; 33(12):3743-50. PubMed ID: 16002789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Stochastic motion and transcriptional dynamics of pairs of distal DNA loci on a compacted chromosome. Brückner DB; Chen H; Barinov L; Zoller B; Gregor T Science; 2023 Jun; 380(6652):1357-1362. PubMed ID: 37384691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Enhancer-promoter interactions become more instructive in the transition from cell-fate specification to tissue differentiation. Pollex T; Rabinowitz A; Gambetta MC; Marco-Ferreres R; Viales RR; Jankowski A; Schaub C; Furlong EEM Nat Genet; 2024 Apr; 56(4):686-696. PubMed ID: 38467791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. On the molecular basis of transvection effects and the regulation of transcription. Zachar Z; Chapman CH; Bingham PM Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 1985; 50():337-46. PubMed ID: 3868483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Shared Transcriptional Machinery at Homologous Alleles Leads to Reduced Transcription in Early Deng H; Lim B Front Cell Dev Biol; 2022; 10():912838. PubMed ID: 35898395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The Cupid shuffle: Do enhancers prefer specific promoters? Wang HV; Corces VG Mol Cell; 2022 Jul; 82(13):2357-2359. PubMed ID: 35803216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Transvection in 2012: site-specific transgenes reveal a plethora of trans-regulatory effects. Kassis JA Genetics; 2012 Aug; 191(4):1037-9. PubMed ID: 22879406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Did Demerec discover intragenic recombination in 1928? Lewis EB Genetics; 2004 Dec; 168(4):1785-6. PubMed ID: 15611155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]