These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29677489)

  • 41. Comparing enhancer action in cis and in trans.
    Bateman JR; Johnson JE; Locke MN
    Genetics; 2012 Aug; 191(4):1143-55. PubMed ID: 22649083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Different enhancer classes in Drosophila bind distinct architectural proteins and mediate unique chromatin interactions and 3D architecture.
    Cubeñas-Potts C; Rowley MJ; Lyu X; Li G; Lei EP; Corces VG
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Feb; 45(4):1714-1730. PubMed ID: 27899590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Coordinate regulation of Drosophila tropomyosin gene expression is controlled by multiple muscle-type-specific positive and negative enhancer elements.
    Gremke L; Lord PC; Sabacan L; Lin SC; Wohlwill A; Storti RV
    Dev Biol; 1993 Oct; 159(2):513-27. PubMed ID: 8405675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Visualizing long-range enhancer-promoter interaction.
    Tsai A; Crocker J
    Nat Genet; 2018 Sep; 50(9):1205-1206. PubMed ID: 30158686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Long distance relationships: enhancer-promoter communication and dynamic gene transcription.
    Marsman J; Horsfield JA
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2012; 1819(11-12):1217-27. PubMed ID: 23124110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Mcp element mediates stable long-range chromosome-chromosome interactions in Drosophila.
    Vazquez J; Müller M; Pirrotta V; Sedat JW
    Mol Biol Cell; 2006 May; 17(5):2158-65. PubMed ID: 16495335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The gypsy insulator can function as a promoter-specific silencer in the Drosophila embryo.
    Cai HN; Levine M
    EMBO J; 1997 Apr; 16(7):1732-41. PubMed ID: 9130717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Long-distance interactions between enhancers and promoters.
    Sipos L; Gyurkovics H
    FEBS J; 2005 Jul; 272(13):3253-9. PubMed ID: 15978032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Enhancer-promoter communication mediated by Chip during Pannier-driven proneural patterning is regulated by Osa.
    Heitzler P; Vanolst L; Biryukova I; Ramain P
    Genes Dev; 2003 Mar; 17(5):591-6. PubMed ID: 12629041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The regulation of enhancer-promoter interactions in the Drosophila embryo.
    Zhou J; Cai HN; Ohtsuki S; Levine M
    Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 1997; 62():307-12. PubMed ID: 9598364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. One thousand and one ways of making functionally similar transcriptional enhancers.
    Veitia RA
    Bioessays; 2008 Nov; 30(11-12):1052-7. PubMed ID: 18937349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. DNA looping induced by a transcriptional enhancer in vivo.
    Petrascheck M; Escher D; Mahmoudi T; Verrijzer CP; Schaffner W; Barberis A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2005; 33(12):3743-50. PubMed ID: 16002789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Stochastic motion and transcriptional dynamics of pairs of distal DNA loci on a compacted chromosome.
    Brückner DB; Chen H; Barinov L; Zoller B; Gregor T
    Science; 2023 Jun; 380(6652):1357-1362. PubMed ID: 37384691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Enhancer-Promoter Communication: Thinking Outside the TAD.
    Galupa R; Crocker J
    Trends Genet; 2020 Jul; 36(7):459-461. PubMed ID: 32544446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Enhancer-promoter interactions become more instructive in the transition from cell-fate specification to tissue differentiation.
    Pollex T; Rabinowitz A; Gambetta MC; Marco-Ferreres R; Viales RR; Jankowski A; Schaub C; Furlong EEM
    Nat Genet; 2024 Apr; 56(4):686-696. PubMed ID: 38467791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. On the molecular basis of transvection effects and the regulation of transcription.
    Zachar Z; Chapman CH; Bingham PM
    Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 1985; 50():337-46. PubMed ID: 3868483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Shared Transcriptional Machinery at Homologous Alleles Leads to Reduced Transcription in Early
    Deng H; Lim B
    Front Cell Dev Biol; 2022; 10():912838. PubMed ID: 35898395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The Cupid shuffle: Do enhancers prefer specific promoters?
    Wang HV; Corces VG
    Mol Cell; 2022 Jul; 82(13):2357-2359. PubMed ID: 35803216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Transvection in 2012: site-specific transgenes reveal a plethora of trans-regulatory effects.
    Kassis JA
    Genetics; 2012 Aug; 191(4):1037-9. PubMed ID: 22879406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Did Demerec discover intragenic recombination in 1928?
    Lewis EB
    Genetics; 2004 Dec; 168(4):1785-6. PubMed ID: 15611155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.