126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29677931)
21. A novel data-driven prognostic model for staging of colorectal cancer.
Manilich EA; Kiran RP; Radivoyevitch T; Lavery I; Fazio VW; Remzi FH
J Am Coll Surg; 2011 Nov; 213(5):579-588, 588.e1-2. PubMed ID: 21925905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A novel method for predicting kidney stone type using ensemble learning.
Kazemi Y; Mirroshandel SA
Artif Intell Med; 2018 Jan; 84():117-126. PubMed ID: 29241659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mapping the transmission risk of Zika virus using machine learning models.
Jiang D; Hao M; Ding F; Fu J; Li M
Acta Trop; 2018 Sep; 185():391-399. PubMed ID: 29932934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Energy landscapes for a machine-learning prediction of patient discharge.
Das R; Wales DJ
Phys Rev E; 2016 Jun; 93(6):063310. PubMed ID: 27415390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Radiation Therapy Outcomes: A Clinician's Perspective.
Kang J; Schwartz R; Flickinger J; Beriwal S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Dec; 93(5):1127-35. PubMed ID: 26581149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Multicenter Comparison of Machine Learning Methods and Conventional Regression for Predicting Clinical Deterioration on the Wards.
Churpek MM; Yuen TC; Winslow C; Meltzer DO; Kattan MW; Edelson DP
Crit Care Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):368-74. PubMed ID: 26771782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prediction of Clinical Deterioration in Hospitalized Adult Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Using a Neural Network Model.
Hu SB; Wong DJ; Correa A; Li N; Deng JC
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161401. PubMed ID: 27532679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A universal deep learning approach for modeling the flow of patients under different severities.
Jiang S; Chin KS; Tsui KL
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Feb; 154():191-203. PubMed ID: 29249343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accurate Diabetes Risk Stratification Using Machine Learning: Role of Missing Value and Outliers.
Maniruzzaman M; Rahman MJ; Al-MehediHasan M; Suri HS; Abedin MM; El-Baz A; Suri JS
J Med Syst; 2018 Apr; 42(5):92. PubMed ID: 29637403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Forecasting influenza-like illness dynamics for military populations using neural networks and social media.
Volkova S; Ayton E; Porterfield K; Corley CD
PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0188941. PubMed ID: 29244814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE)-based prognostic signature to predict metastasis in clinically low risk stage I/II microsatellite stable colorectal cancer.
Low YS; Blöcker C; McPherson JR; Tang SA; Cheng YY; Wong JYS; Chua C; Lim TKH; Tang CL; Chew MH; Tan P; Tan IB; Rozen SG; Cheah PY
Cancer Lett; 2017 Sep; 403():13-20. PubMed ID: 28624625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Extreme learning machines: a new approach for modeling dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration with and without water quality variables as predictors.
Heddam S; Kisi O
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jul; 24(20):16702-16724. PubMed ID: 28560629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Making Individual Prognoses in Psychiatry Using Neuroimaging and Machine Learning.
Janssen RJ; Mourão-Miranda J; Schnack HG
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging; 2018 Sep; 3(9):798-808. PubMed ID: 29789268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Teaching a Machine to Feel Postoperative Pain: Combining High-Dimensional Clinical Data with Machine Learning Algorithms to Forecast Acute Postoperative Pain.
Tighe PJ; Harle CA; Hurley RW; Aytug H; Boezaart AP; Fillingim RB
Pain Med; 2015 Jul; 16(7):1386-401. PubMed ID: 26031220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fetal health status prediction based on maternal clinical history using machine learning techniques.
Akbulut A; Ertugrul E; Topcu V
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():87-100. PubMed ID: 30119860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prostate Cancer Probability Prediction By Machine Learning Technique.
Jović S; Miljković M; Ivanović M; Šaranović M; Arsić M
Cancer Invest; 2017 Nov; 35(10):647-651. PubMed ID: 29243988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prediction of the prognosis of ischemic stroke patients after intravenous thrombolysis using artificial neural networks.
Cheng CA; Lin YC; Chiu HW
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 202():115-8. PubMed ID: 25000029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Urinary bladder cancer staging in CT urography using machine learning.
Garapati SS; Hadjiiski L; Cha KH; Chan HP; Caoili EM; Cohan RH; Weizer A; Alva A; Paramagul C; Wei J; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5814-5823. PubMed ID: 28786480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Endometrial Cancer Individualized Scoring System (ECISS): A machine learning-based prediction model of endometrial cancer prognosis.
Shazly SA; Coronado PJ; Yılmaz E; Melekoglu R; Sahin H; Giannella L; Ciavattini A; Carpini GD; Di Giuseppe J; Yordanov A; Karakadieva K; Nedelcheva NM; Vasileva-Slaveva M; Alcazar JL; Chacon E; Manzour N; Vara J; Karaman E; Karaaslan O; Hacıoğlu L; Korkmaz D; Onal C; Knez J; Ferrari F; Hosni EM; Mahmoud ME; Elassall GM; Abdo MS; Mohamed YI; Abdelbadie AS;
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Jun; 161(3):760-768. PubMed ID: 36572053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Treatment-related features improve machine learning prediction of prognosis in soft tissue sarcoma patients.
Peeken JC; Goldberg T; Knie C; Komboz B; Bernhofer M; Pasa F; Kessel KA; Tafti PD; Rost B; Nüsslin F; Braun AE; Combs SE
Strahlenther Onkol; 2018 Sep; 194(9):824-834. PubMed ID: 29557486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
