123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2967831)
21. Combined "periprostatic and periapical" local anesthesia is not superior to "periprostatic" anesthesia alone in reducing pain during Tru-Cut prostate biopsy.
Cevik I; Dillioglugil O; Zisman A; Akdas A
Urology; 2006 Dec; 68(6):1215-9. PubMed ID: 17169645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Value of NMR tomography in the diagnosis and staging of prostatic neoplasms].
Beyer HK; Funke PJ; Brackins-Romero J; Uhlenbrock D
Digitale Bilddiagn; 1986 Mar; 6(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 2421961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative study of suprapubic sonography and computed tomography for staging of prostatic carcinoma.
Denkhaus H; Dierkopf W; Grabbe E; Donn F
Urol Radiol; 1983; 5(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 6836785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Use of endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer.
Chelsky MJ; Schnall MD; Seidmon EJ; Pollack HM
J Urol; 1993 Aug; 150(2 Pt 1):391-5. PubMed ID: 8326561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnosis and staging of prostatic cancer by transrectal ultrasonography. A preliminary study.
Peeling WB; Griffiths GJ; Evans KT; Roberts EE
Br J Urol; 1979 Dec; 51(6):565-9. PubMed ID: 93975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. T3 prostate cancer: how reliable is clinical staging?
Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod L
Semin Urol Oncol; 1997 Nov; 15(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9421446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Suprapubic prostatic sonography for staging prostatic carcinoma].
Denkhaus H; Dierkopf W; Donn F
Rofo; 1982 Oct; 137(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 6216177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Endo-rectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in clinically localized prostate cancer: is it accurate?
Perrotti M; Kaufman RP; Jennings TA; Thaler HT; Soloway SM; Rifkin MD; Fisher HA
J Urol; 1996 Jul; 156(1):106-9. PubMed ID: 8648768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: correlation with histopathologic results.
Jager GJ; Ruijter ET; van de Kaa CA; de la Rosette JJ; Oosterhof GO; Thornbury JR; Ruijs SH; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 9169683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate.
Poon PY; McCallum RW; Henkelman MM; Bronskill MJ; Sutcliffe SB; Jewett MA; Rider WD; Bruce AW
Radiology; 1985 Jan; 154(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 2578070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Engelbrecht MR; Huisman HJ; Laheij RJ; Jager GJ; van Leenders GJ; Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa CA; de la Rosette JJ; Blickman JG; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):248-54. PubMed ID: 12944607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Anatomic distribution of periprostatic adipose tissue: a mapping study of 100 radical prostatectomy specimens.
Hong H; Koch MO; Foster RS; Bihrle R; Gardner TA; Fyffe J; Ulbright TM; Eble JN; Cheng L
Cancer; 2003 Apr; 97(7):1639-43. PubMed ID: 12655520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Does magnetic resonance imaging allow the assessment of the loco-regional extension of cancer of the prostate? Report of 27 anatomo-radiologic comparisons].
Castagnola C; Maréchal JM; Bouvier R; Lapra C; Marmey G; Bourachot JP; Dawahra M; Cuzin B; Viguier JL; Gelet A
Prog Urol; 1992 Jun; 2(3):409-19. PubMed ID: 1302079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Magnetic resonance with endorectal coil in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma. Comparison with histologic macrosections in 40 cases].
Torricelli P; Iadanza M; De Santis M; Pollastri CA; Cesinaro AM; Trentini G; Romagnoli R
Radiol Med; 1999 Jun; 97(6):491-8. PubMed ID: 10478207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for staging of prostatic cancer].
Hayashi N; Kawamura J; Sugimura Y
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1996 Oct; 42(10):767-73. PubMed ID: 8951473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Periprostatic fat thickness on MRI: correlation with Gleason score in prostate cancer.
Woo S; Cho JY; Kim SY; Kim SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):W43-7. PubMed ID: 25539273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Hormonal ablation of prostatic cancer: effects on prostate morphology, tumor detection, and staging by endorectal coil MR imaging.
Chen M; Hricak H; Kalbhen CL; Kurhanewicz J; Vigneron DB; Weiss JM; Carroll PR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1157-63. PubMed ID: 8615261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Value of determining prostate-specific antigen for early detection or prostatic carcinoma].
Hammerer P; Huland H
Urologe A; 1995 Jul; 34(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 7545842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging.
Schnall MD; Imai Y; Tomaszewski J; Pollack HM; Lenkinski RE; Kressel HY
Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):797-802. PubMed ID: 1994421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of digital rectal examination, flexible cystoscopy and prostatic biopsy on free and total prostate specific antigen, and the free-to-total prostate specific antigen ratio in clinical practice.
Collins GN; Martin PJ; Wynn-Davies A; Brooman PJ; O'Reilly PH
J Urol; 1997 May; 157(5):1744-7. PubMed ID: 9112518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
