777 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29678585)
1. Fracture load of metal-ceramic, monolithic, and bi-layered zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses after thermo-mechanical cycling.
López-Suárez C; Castillo-Oyagüe R; Rodríguez-Alonso V; Lynch CD; Suárez-García MJ
J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():97-104. PubMed ID: 29678585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Thermomechanical and Static Loading on the Load to Fracture of Metal-Ceramic, Monolithic, and Veneered Zirconia Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures.
Lopez-Suarez C; Tobar C; Sola-Ruiz MF; Pelaez J; Suarez MJ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 30548895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative fracture behavior of monolithic and veneered zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses.
Lopez-Suarez C; Rodriguez V; Pelaez J; Agustin-Panadero R; Suarez MJ
Dent Mater J; 2017 Nov; 36(6):816-821. PubMed ID: 28845035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal Vertical Discrepancies of Monolithic and Veneered Zirconia and Metal-Ceramic Three-Unit Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Lopez-Suarez C; Gonzalo E; Pelaez J; Serrano B; Suarez MJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):256-8. PubMed ID: 27148985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The fracture load and failure types of veneered anterior zirconia crowns: an analysis of normal and Weibull distribution of complete and censored data.
Stawarczyk B; Ozcan M; Hämmerle CH; Roos M
Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 22196897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture Load Before and After Veneering Zirconia Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Rodríguez V; Castillo-Oyagüe R; López-Suárez C; Gonzalo E; Peláez J; Suárez-García MJ
J Prosthodont; 2016 Oct; 25(7):550-556. PubMed ID: 26380955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations.
Hamza TA; Sherif RM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e259-e264. PubMed ID: 29044828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fatigue behavior of zirconia-ceramic, galvano-ceramic, and porcelain-fused-to-metal fixed partial dentures.
Eroğlu Z; Gurbulak AG
J Prosthodont; 2013 Oct; 22(7):516-522. PubMed ID: 23735078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monolithic and bi-layer CAD/CAM lithium-disilicate versus metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: comparison of fracture loads and failure modes after fatigue.
Schultheis S; Strub JR; Gerds TA; Guess PC
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jun; 17(5):1407-13. PubMed ID: 23001151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture behavior of all-ceramic, implant-supported, and tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Alkharrat AR; Schmitter M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 May; 22(4):1663-1673. PubMed ID: 29196948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. STRESS DISTRIBUTION OF MONOLITHIC AND VENEERED THREE-UNIT ZIRCONIA FDPS: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS.
Alsarani MM; El-Mowaf OY; Coyle TW; Rizkalla A; Fava J
Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; (3):112-122. PubMed ID: 37196037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings--a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations.
Beuer F; Schweiger J; Eichberger M; Kappert HF; Gernet W; Edelhoff D
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 18620748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of various veneering techniques on mechanical strength of computer-controlled zirconia framework designs.
Kanat B; Cömlekoğlu EM; Dündar-Çömlekoğlu M; Hakan Sen B; Ozcan M; Ali Güngör M
J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 23(6):445-55. PubMed ID: 24417370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized controlled clinical trial of 3-unit posterior zirconia-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDP) with layered or pressed veneering ceramics: 3-year results.
Naenni N; Bindl A; Sax C; Hämmerle C; Sailer I
J Dent; 2015 Nov; 43(11):1365-70. PubMed ID: 26234623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inlay-retained cantilever fixed dental prostheses to substitute a single premolar: impact of zirconia framework design after dynamic loading.
Shahin R; Tannous F; Kern M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2014 Aug; 122(4):310-6. PubMed ID: 24910293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Crowns on Titanium Implant Abutments.
Weyhrauch M; Igiel C; Scheller H; Weibrich G; Lehmann KM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 27004277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Metal-Ceramic and All-Ceramic Three-Unit Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses: A 3-Year Randomized Clinical Trial.
Nicolaisen MH; Bahrami G; Schropp L; Isidor F
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 27148986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
