These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2967883)
1. Geometry or not geometry? Perceived orientation and spatial layout in pictures viewed at an angle. Goldstein EB J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 May; 14(2):312-4. PubMed ID: 2967883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial layout, orientation relative to the observer, and perceived projection in pictures viewed at an angle. Goldstein EB J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 May; 13(2):256-66. PubMed ID: 2953855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rotation of objects in pictures viewed at an angle: evidence for different properties of two types of pictorial space. Goldstein EB J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Feb; 5(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 528932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Affine distortions of pictorial space: some predictions for Goldstein (1987) that La Gournerie (1859) might have made. Cutting JE J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 May; 14(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 2967882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Picture perception is array-specific: viewing angle versus apparent orientation. Halloran TO Percept Psychophys; 1989 May; 45(5):467-82. PubMed ID: 2726410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of planar cuts' orientation on the perceived surface layout and object's shape. Bocheva N Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jul; 131(3):178-93. PubMed ID: 19481718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Foreshortened tiles in paths converging on an observer viewing a picture: elevation and visual angle ratio determine perceived size. Juricevic I; Kennedy JM; Abramov I Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 19304613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Foreshortening produces errors in the perception of angles pictured as on the ground. Wnuczko M; Singh K; Kennedy JM Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):309-16. PubMed ID: 26537919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The frame turns also: factors in differential rotation in pictures. Halloran TO Percept Psychophys; 1993 Oct; 54(4):496-508. PubMed ID: 8255712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of temporal modulation and spatial location on the perceived spatial frequency of visual patterns. Marran L; Davis ET Percept Psychophys; 1990 May; 47(5):449-56. PubMed ID: 2349057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of viewing position on the perceived layout of space. Toye RC Percept Psychophys; 1986 Aug; 40(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 3763364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Looking at perspective pictures from too far, too close, and just right. Juricevic I; Kennedy JM J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Aug; 135(3):448-61. PubMed ID: 16846274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why pictures look right when viewed from the wrong place. Vishwanath D; Girshick AR; Banks MS Nat Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 8(10):1401-10. PubMed ID: 16172600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discrimination of geometric angle in the fronto-parallel plane. Snippe HP; Koenderink JJ Spat Vis; 1994; 8(3):309-28. PubMed ID: 7833299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aspect graphs for visual recognition of three-dimensional objects. Van Effelterre T Perception; 1994; 23(5):563-82. PubMed ID: 7800470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Compensation is unnecessary for the perception of faces in slanted pictures. Busey TA; Brady NP; Cutting JE Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jul; 48(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 2377436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optic array determinants of apparent distance and size in pictures. Bengston JK; Stergios JC; Ward JL; Jester RE J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Nov; 6(4):751-9. PubMed ID: 6449542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]