These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29679423)

  • 21. Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions-a clinical comparative study.
    Rödiger M; Heinitz A; Bürgers R; Rinke S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):579-587. PubMed ID: 27469102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Comparison of Marginal Gaps of All-Ceramic Crowns Constructed from Scanned Impressions and Models.
    Tabesh R; Dudley J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(1):71–73. PubMed ID: 29166420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Marginal adaptation of full-coverage CAD/CAM restorations: in vitro study using a non-destructive method.
    Romeo E; Iorio M; Storelli S; Camandona M; Abati S
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009 Mar; 58(3):61-72. PubMed ID: 19357612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A novel computer-aided method to fabricate a custom one-piece glass fiber dowel-and-core based on digitized impression and crown preparation data.
    Chen Z; Li Y; Deng X; Wang X
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):276-83. PubMed ID: 24118182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of an indirect impression scanning system and two direct intraoral scanning systems in vivo.
    Bosniac P; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2421-2427. PubMed ID: 30298453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology.
    Pradíes G; Zarauz C; Valverde A; Ferreiroa A; Martínez-Rus F
    J Dent; 2015 Feb; 43(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 25527248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner.
    An S; Kim S; Choi H; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1171-5. PubMed ID: 24951386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Marginal Fit Comparison of CAD/CAM Crowns Milled from Two Different Materials.
    Azarbal A; Azarbal M; Engelmeier RL; Kunkel TC
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 27(5):421-428. PubMed ID: 29143397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fit evaluation of cad/cam fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization
    Arcuri L; Lorenzi C; Bianchi N; Marchetti E; Barlattani A
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2019; 33(3 Suppl. 1):103-111. DENTAL SUPPLEMENT. PubMed ID: 31538456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fit of pressed crowns fabricated from two CAD-CAM wax pattern process plans: A comparative in vitro study.
    Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 28024815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An In Vitro Comparison of the Marginal Adaptation Accuracy of CAD/CAM Restorations Using Different Impression Systems.
    Shembesh M; Ali A; Finkelman M; Weber HP; Zandparsa R
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):581-586. PubMed ID: 26855068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns: Press vs. CAD/CAM.
    Azar B; Eckert S; Kunkela J; Ingr T; Mounajjed R
    Braz Oral Res; 2018; 32():e001. PubMed ID: 29364328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Marginal Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns Fabricated Using Conventional and Digital Methodology: A Three-Dimensional Analysis.
    Mostafa NZ; Ruse ND; Ford NL; Carvalho RM; Wyatt CCL
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):145-152. PubMed ID: 28833920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of single-unit ceramic crown fabrication after digital versus conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Manisha J; Srivastava G; Das SS; Tabarak N; Choudhury GK
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(2):105-111. PubMed ID: 37102534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analysis of Vertical Misfit of Crowns Fabricated with CAD/CAM Technology using Two Scanning Techniques: Direct and Indirect.
    Junior WM; S Bueno CR; Ac Filho JR; Osorio LS; Neves MC; Junior JF; Filho HN
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Mar; 20(3):285-290. PubMed ID: 31204319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of CNC-milling on the marginal and internal fit of dental ceramics: a pilot study.
    Schaefer O; Kuepper H; Thompson GA; Cachovan G; Hefti AF; Guentsch A
    Dent Mater; 2013 Aug; 29(8):851-8. PubMed ID: 23743092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of crowns based on digital intraoral scanning compared to conventional impression-a split-mouth randomised clinical study.
    Haddadi Y; Bahrami G; Isidor F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Nov; 23(11):4043-4050. PubMed ID: 30796587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling.
    Syrek A; Reich G; Ranftl D; Klein C; Cerny B; Brodesser J
    J Dent; 2010 Jul; 38(7):553-9. PubMed ID: 20381576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the marginal fit of monolithic crowns fabricated by direct and indirect digitization.
    Freire Y; Gonzalo E; Lopez-Suarez C; Pelaez J; Suarez MJ
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):291-297. PubMed ID: 33041277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.