These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29679728)
21. Coronal oblique turbo STIR imaging of the sacrum and sacroiliac joints at routine MR imaging of the lumbar spine. Gleeson TG; O'Connell MJ; Duke D; Ryan M; Ennis R; Eustace SJ Emerg Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(1-2):38-43. PubMed ID: 16333609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Using Natural Language Processing of Free-Text Radiology Reports to Identify Type 1 Modic Endplate Changes. Huhdanpaa HT; Tan WK; Rundell SD; Suri P; Chokshi FH; Comstock BA; Heagerty PJ; James KT; Avins AL; Nedeljkovic SS; Nerenz DR; Kallmes DF; Luetmer PH; Sherman KJ; Organ NL; Griffith B; Langlotz CP; Carrell D; Hassanpour S; Jarvik JG J Digit Imaging; 2018 Feb; 31(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 28808792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Predictability of the effects of facet joint infiltration in the degenerate lumbar spine when assessing MRI scans. Hofmann UK; Keller RL; Walter C; Mittag F J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Nov; 12(1):180. PubMed ID: 29162138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Does provocative discography cause clinically important injury to the lumbar intervertebral disc? A 10-year matched cohort study. Cuellar JM; Stauff MP; Herzog RJ; Carrino JA; Baker GA; Carragee EJ Spine J; 2016 Mar; 16(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 26133255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sociodemographic Variation in the Use of Conservative Therapy Before MRI of the Lumbar Spine for Low Back Pain in the Era of Public Reporting. Lind KE; Flug JA J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Apr; 16(4 Pt B):560-569. PubMed ID: 30947888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with and without Waddell Signs. Cox JS; Blizzard S; Carlson H; Hiratzka J; Yoo JU Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):990-994. PubMed ID: 28336484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An evaluation of MRI lumbar spine scans within a community-based diagnostic setting. Hudson D; Knapp K; Benwell M Musculoskeletal Care; 2021 Sep; 19(3):384-395. PubMed ID: 33278329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnosis of low back pain: role of imaging studies. Russo RB Clin Occup Environ Med; 2006; 5(3):571-89, vi. PubMed ID: 16963376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reliability of standing weight-bearing (0.25T) MR imaging findings and positional changes in the lumbar spine. Hansen BB; Hansen P; Christensen AF; Trampedach C; Rasti Z; Bliddal H; Boesen M Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Jan; 47(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 28812185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Lumbar spine radiography – unreliable diagnostic accuracy and negligible value for the patients]. Annertz M; Andrén-Sandberg Å; Aspelin P; Fridén T; Geijer M; Nyman U Lakartidningen; 2017 Nov; 114():. PubMed ID: 29292917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Primary care physicians' use of lumbar spine imaging tests: effects of guidelines and practice pattern feedback. Freeborn DK; Shye D; Mullooly JP; Eraker S; Romeo J J Gen Intern Med; 1997 Oct; 12(10):619-25. PubMed ID: 9346458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prevalence of thoracic spine lesions masquerading as cauda equina syndrome: yield of a novel magnetic resonance imaging protocol. Stolper K; Haug JC; Christensen CT; Samsey KM; April MD Intern Emerg Med; 2017 Dec; 12(8):1259-1264. PubMed ID: 27815809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Extraspinal findings at lumbar spine CT examinations: prevalence and clinical importance. Lee SY; Landis MS; Ross IG; Goela A; Leung AE Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):502-9. PubMed ID: 22438363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Lumbar subcutaneous edema and degenerative spinal disease in patients with low back pain: a retrospective MRI study. Quattrocchi CC; Giona A; Di Martino A; Gaudino F; Mallio CA; Errante Y; Occhicone F; Vitali MA; Zobel BB; Denaro V Musculoskelet Surg; 2015 Aug; 99(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 25904349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Imaging for low back pain: is clinical use consistent with guidelines? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Jenkins HJ; Downie AS; Maher CG; Moloney NA; Magnussen JS; Hancock MJ Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2266-2277. PubMed ID: 29730460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Rapid MR imaging versus plain radiography in patients with low back pain: initial results of a randomized study. Jarvik JG; Maravilla KR; Haynor DR; Levitz M; Deyo RA Radiology; 1997 Aug; 204(2):447-54. PubMed ID: 9240534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Systematic approach to interpretation of the lumbar spine MR imaging examination. Ly JQ Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 May; 15(2):155-66, v. PubMed ID: 17599637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Interrater and intrarater agreements of magnetic resonance imaging findings in the lumbar spine: significant variability across degenerative conditions. Fu MC; Buerba RA; Long WD; Blizzard DJ; Lischuk AW; Haims AH; Grauer JN Spine J; 2014 Oct; 14(10):2442-8. PubMed ID: 24642053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]