138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29680295)
1. Rodents are carriers of Clostridioides difficile strains similar to those isolated from piglets.
de Oliveira CA; de Paula Gabardo M; Guedes RMC; Poncet F; Blanc DS; Lobato FCF; Silva ROS
Anaerobe; 2018 Jun; 51():61-63. PubMed ID: 29680295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clostridium difficile in wild rodents and insectivores in the Netherlands.
Krijger IM; Meerburg BG; Harmanus C; Burt SA
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2019 Jul; 69(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 30958895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Specimen Type and Processing on the Detection of
Candel-Pérez C; Martínez-Miró S; Ros-Berruezo G; Martínez-Graciá C
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2019 Nov; 16(11):731-737. PubMed ID: 31225737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High prevalence of Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 078 in pigs in Korea.
Kim HY; Cho A; Kim JW; Kim H; Kim B
Anaerobe; 2018 Jun; 51():42-46. PubMed ID: 29604338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in feces of calves of different age and determination of predominant Clostridioides difficile ribotype 033 relatedness and transmission between family dairy farms using multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis.
Bandelj P; Harmanus C; Blagus R; Cotman M; Kuijper EJ; Ocepek M; Vengust M
BMC Vet Res; 2018 Oct; 14(1):298. PubMed ID: 30285751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 046 is common among neonatal pigs and humans in Sweden.
Norén T; Johansson K; Unemo M
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Jan; 20(1):O2-6. PubMed ID: 23927574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence and diversity of toxigenic Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium difficile among swine herds in the midwest.
Baker AA; Davis E; Rehberger T; Rosener D
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2010 May; 76(9):2961-7. PubMed ID: 20208029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clostridium difficile in young farm animals and slaughter animals in Belgium.
Rodriguez C; Taminiau B; Van Broeck J; Avesani V; Delmée M; Daube G
Anaerobe; 2012 Dec; 18(6):621-5. PubMed ID: 23041559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. PCR-ribotype distribution of Clostridium difficile in Irish pigs.
Stein K; Egan S; Lynch H; Harmanus C; Kyne L; Herra C; McDermott S; Kuijper E; Fitzpatrick F; FitzGerald S; Fenelon L; Drudy D
Anaerobe; 2017 Dec; 48():237-241. PubMed ID: 29024758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clostridioides difficile on Ohio swine farms (2015): A comparison of swine and human environments and assessment of on-farm risk factors.
O'Shaughnessy RA; Habing GG; Gebreyes WA; Bowman AS; Weese JS; Rousseau J; Stull JW
Zoonoses Public Health; 2019 Nov; 66(7):861-870. PubMed ID: 31389666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative genomic analysis of toxin-negative strains of Clostridium difficile from humans and animals with symptoms of gastrointestinal disease.
Roy Chowdhury P; DeMaere M; Chapman T; Worden P; Charles IG; Darling AE; Djordjevic SP
BMC Microbiol; 2016 Mar; 16():41. PubMed ID: 26971047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-toxigenic strain of Clostridioides difficile Z31 reduces the occurrence of C. difficile infection (CDI) in one-day-old piglets on a commercial pig farm.
Oliveira Júnior CA; Silva ROS; Lage AP; Coura FM; Ramos CP; Alfieri AA; Guedes RMC; Lobato FCF
Vet Microbiol; 2019 Apr; 231():1-6. PubMed ID: 30955794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association of toxin-producing Clostridioides difficile with piglet diarrhea and potential transmission to humans.
Takeichi K; Fukuda A; Shono C; Ota N; Nakajima C; Suzuki Y; Usui M
J Vet Med Sci; 2024 Jul; 86(7):769-776. PubMed ID: 38797681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Persistence of Clostridium difficile RT 237 infection in a Western Australian piggery.
Moono P; Putsathit P; Knight DR; Squire MM; Hampson DJ; Foster NF; Riley TV
Anaerobe; 2016 Feb; 37():62-6. PubMed ID: 26679487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Longitudinal study of Clostridium difficile shedding in raccoons on swine farms and conservation areas in Ontario, Canada.
Bondo KJ; Weese JS; Rouseau J; Jardine CM
BMC Vet Res; 2015 Oct; 11():254. PubMed ID: 26446591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immunochromatographic test and ELISA for the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and A/B toxins as an alternative for the diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile-associated diarrhea in foals and neonatal piglets.
Ramos CP; Lopes EO; Oliveira Júnior CA; Diniz AN; Lobato FCF; Silva ROS
Braz J Microbiol; 2020 Sep; 51(3):1459-1462. PubMed ID: 32363568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant
Rothenburger JL; Rousseau JD; Weese JS; Jardine CM
Can J Vet Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):66-69. PubMed ID: 29382971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of eight commercial enzyme immunoassays for the detection of Clostridium difficile from stool samples and effect of strain type.
René P; Frenette CP; Schiller I; Dendukuri N; Brassard P; Fenn S; Loo VG
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 May; 73(1):94-6. PubMed ID: 22424900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Porcine and bovine Clostridium difficile ribotype 078 isolates demonstrate similar growth and toxigenic properties.
Grześkowiak Ł; Riedmüller J; de Thomasson H; Bordessoule S; Seyboldt C; Zentek J; Vahjen W
Int Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 21(4):215-221. PubMed ID: 30810901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Isolation of Clostridium difficile from food animals in Slovenia.
Pirs T; Ocepek M; Rupnik M
J Med Microbiol; 2008 Jun; 57(Pt 6):790-792. PubMed ID: 18480339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
