These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29681585)
1. Clinical Outcomes of Subintimal vs. Intraluminal Revascularization Approaches for Long Femoropopliteal Occlusions in a Korean Multicenter Retrospective Registry Cohort. Kim K; Ko YG; Ahn CM; Min PK; Lee JH; Yoon CH; Yu CW; Lee SW; Lee SR; Choi SH; Koh YS; Chae IH; Choi D Circ J; 2018 Jun; 82(7):1900-1907. PubMed ID: 29681585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Initial and 3-year results after subintimal versus intraluminal approach for long femoropopliteal occlusion treated with a self-expandable nitinol stent. Soga Y; Iida O; Suzuki K; Hirano K; Kawasaki D; Shintani Y; Suematsu N; Yamaoka T J Vasc Surg; 2013 Dec; 58(6):1547-55. PubMed ID: 23910456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of spot stenting versus long stenting after intentional subintimal approach for long chronic total occlusions of the femoropopliteal artery. Hong SJ; Ko YG; Shin DH; Kim JS; Kim BK; Choi D; Hong MK; Jang Y JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Mar; 8(3):472-480. PubMed ID: 25703873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved technical success and midterm patency with subintimal angioplasty compared to intraluminal angioplasty in long femoropopliteal occlusions. Ko YG; Kim JS; Choi DH; Jang Y; Shim WH J Endovasc Ther; 2007 Jun; 14(3):374-81. PubMed ID: 17723006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A single-center retrospective analysis of patency rates of intraluminal versus subintimal endovascular revascularization of long femoropopliteal occlusions. Babaev A; Hari P; Gokhale R; Zavlunova S Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017 Sep; 18(6):399-404. PubMed ID: 28347605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mid-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment for TASC-II D Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease with Critical Limb Ischemia. Torres-Blanco Á; Edo-Fleta G; Gómez-Palonés F; Molina-Nácher V; Ortiz-Monzón E Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2016 Mar; 39(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 26202389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of stent-supported subintimal angioplasty in the treatment of long iliac artery occlusions. Ko YG; Shin S; Kim KJ; Kim JS; Hong MK; Jang Y; Shim WH; Choi D J Vasc Surg; 2011 Jul; 54(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 21334171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility and 1-Year outcomes of subintimal revascularization with supera Palena LM; Diaz-Sandoval LJ; Sultato E; Brigato C; Candeo A; Brocco E; Manzi M Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Apr; 89(5):910-920. PubMed ID: 27862880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative assessment of patient outcomes with intraluminal or subintimal crossing of infrainguinal peripheral artery chronic total occlusions. Kondapalli A; Jeon-Slaughter H; Lu H; Xu H; Khalili H; Prasad A; Armstrong EJ; Brilakis ES; Banerjee S Vasc Med; 2018 Feb; 23(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 29105577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Duplex-guided endovascular treatment for occlusive and stenotic lesions of the femoral-popliteal arterial segment: a comparative study in the first 253 cases. Ascher E; Marks NA; Hingorani AP; Schutzer RW; Mutyala M J Vasc Surg; 2006 Dec; 44(6):1230-7; discussion 1237-8. PubMed ID: 17055689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Subintimal angioplasty as a treatment of femoropopliteal artery occlusions. Laxdal E; Jenssen GL; Pedersen G; Aune S Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2003 Jun; 25(6):578-82. PubMed ID: 12787703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subintimal angioplasty in femoropopliteal region-Mid-term results. Köcher M; Cerna M; Utikal P; Kozak J; Sisola I; Thomas RP; Bachleda P; Drac P; Sekanina Z; Langova K Eur J Radiol; 2010 Mar; 73(3):672-6. PubMed ID: 19195808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Subintimal angioplasty of long femoropopliteal artery occlusions]. Ostri CH; Just SR; Eldrup N; Sillesen HH Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Mar; 168(10):1030-4. PubMed ID: 16522296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Endovascular Versus Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal TASC II D Lesions: A Single-Center Study. Veraldi GF; Mezzetto L; Macrì M; Criscenti P; Corvasce A; Poli R Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Feb; 47():179-187. PubMed ID: 28943491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endovascular interventions for TransAtlantic InterSociety Consensus II C and D femoropopliteal lesions. Yin MY; Jiang ME; Huang XT; Lu M; Lu XW; Huang Y; Li WM Chin Med J (Engl); 2013 Feb; 126(3):415-20. PubMed ID: 23422099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. One-year clinical outcome after primary stenting for Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D femoropopliteal lesions (the STELLA "STEnting Long de L'Artère fémorale superficielle" cohort). Davaine JM; Azéma L; Guyomarch B; Chaillou P; Costargent A; Patra P; Lambert G; Gouëffic Y Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2012 Oct; 44(4):432-41. PubMed ID: 22920949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparable 2-Year Restenosis Rates Following Subintimal and Intraluminal Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Femoropopliteal Chronic Total Occlusion. Ishihara T; Takahara M; Iida O; Soga Y; Hirano K; Yamauchi Y; Zen K; Kawasaki D; Nanto S; Yokoi H; Uematsu M; J Endovasc Ther; 2016 Dec; 23(6):889-895. PubMed ID: 27566704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subintimal Versus Intraluminal Approach for Femoropopliteal Chronic Total Occlusions Treated With Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance. Tomoi Y; Takahara M; Kuramitsu S; Soga Y; Iida O; Fujihara M; Kawasaki D; Ando K; J Am Heart Assoc; 2021 Oct; 10(20):e021903. PubMed ID: 34612052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Late outcomes of balloon angioplasty and angioplasty with selective stenting for superficial femoral-popliteal disease are equivalent. Nguyen BN; Conrad MF; Guest JM; Hackney L; Patel VI; Kwolek CJ; Cambria RP J Vasc Surg; 2011 Oct; 54(4):1051-1057.e1. PubMed ID: 21636240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]