143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29681784)
1. Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis of
Shi X; Li N; Ding H; Dang Y; Hu G; Liu S; Cui J; Zhang Y; Li F; Zhang H; Huo L
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2018; 2018():9193403. PubMed ID: 29681784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (ordered-subset expectation maximization) in dynamic positron emission tomography: quantitative effects on kinetic modeling with N-13 ammonia in healthy subjects.
Hove JD; Rasmussen R; Freiberg J; Holm S; Kelbaek H; Kofoed KE
J Nucl Cardiol; 2008; 15(4):530-4. PubMed ID: 18674721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling.
Boellaard R; van Lingen A; Lammertsma AA
J Nucl Med; 2001 May; 42(5):808-17. PubMed ID: 11337581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of image reconstruction algorithm on neurotransmission PET studies in humans: comparison between filtered backprojection and ordered subsets expectation maximization.
Morimoto T; Ito H; Takano A; Ikoma Y; Seki C; Okauchi T; Tanimoto K; Ando A; Shiraishi T; Yamaya T; Suhara T
Ann Nucl Med; 2006 Apr; 20(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 16715957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) versus filtered back-projection for the assessment of myocardial glucose uptake and myocardial perfusion using dynamic PET.
Søndergaard HM; Madsen MM; Boisen K; Bøttcher M; Schmitz O; Nielsen TT; Bøtker HE; Hansen SB
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Mar; 34(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 17033850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of time of flight and point spread function on quantitative parameters of lung lesions in
Huang K; Feng Y; Liang W; Li L
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Nov; 21(1):169. PubMed ID: 34773998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative accuracy of MAP reconstruction for dynamic PET imaging in small animals.
Cheng JC; Shoghi K; Laforest R
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1029-41. PubMed ID: 22320813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of reconstruction algorithms on myocardial blood flow measurement with 13N-ammonia PET.
Chen GP; Branch KR; Alessio AM; Pham P; Tabibiazar R; Kinahan P; Caldwell JH
J Nucl Med; 2007 Aug; 48(8):1259-65. PubMed ID: 17631543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on
Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Postinjection transmission scanning in myocardial 18F-FDG PET studies using both filtered backprojection and iterative reconstruction.
van der Weerdt AP; Boellaard R; Knaapen P; Visser CA; Lammertsma AA; Visser FC
J Nucl Med; 2004 Feb; 45(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 14960632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of different signal-to-background ratios on spatial resolution and F18-FDG-PET quantification using point spread function and time-of-flight reconstruction.
Rogasch JM; Hofheinz F; Lougovski A; Furth C; Ruf J; Großer OS; Mohnike K; Hass P; Walke M; Amthauer H; Steffen IG
EJNMMI Phys; 2014 Dec; 1(1):12. PubMed ID: 26501454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attenuation correction in whole-body FDG oncological studies: the role of statistical reconstruction.
Lonneux M; Borbath I; Bol A; Coppens A; Sibomana M; Bausart R; Defrise M; Pauwels S; Michel C
Eur J Nucl Med; 1999 Jun; 26(6):591-8. PubMed ID: 10369944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct parametric reconstruction in dynamic PET myocardial perfusion imaging: in vivo studies.
Petibon Y; Rakvongthai Y; El Fakhri G; Ouyang J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(9):3539-3565. PubMed ID: 28379843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative comparison of analytic and iterative reconstruction methods in 2- and 3-dimensional dynamic cardiac 18F-FDG PET.
Lubberink M; Boellaard R; van der Weerdt AP; Visser FC; Lammertsma AA
J Nucl Med; 2004 Dec; 45(12):2008-15. PubMed ID: 15585474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of 3-dimensional reconstruction algorithms for the high-resolution research tomograph.
van Velden FH; Kloet RW; van Berckel BN; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2009 Jan; 50(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 19091902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative and Qualitative Improvement of Low-Count [
Seo Y; Khalighi MM; Wangerin KA; Deller TW; Wang YH; Jivan S; Kohi MP; Aggarwal R; Flavell RR; Behr SC; Evans MJ
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Feb; 22(1):208-216. PubMed ID: 30993558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes of [
Liu Y; Gao MJ; Zhou J; Du F; Chen L; Huang ZK; Hu JB; Lou C
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Sep; 21(1):133. PubMed ID: 34530768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of reconstruction algorithms and time of flight information on PET/CT image quality.
Suljic A; Tomse P; Jensterle L; Skrk D
Radiol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 49(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 26401127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies.
Sah BR; Stolzmann P; Delso G; Wollenweber SD; Hüllner M; Hakami YA; Queiroz MA; Barbosa FG; von Schulthess GK; Pietsch C; Veit-Haibach P
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jan; 38(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 27755394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
