These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29682777)

  • 1. Comparative review of novel model-assisted designs for phase I clinical trials.
    Zhou H; Murray TA; Pan H; Yuan Y
    Stat Med; 2018 Jun; 37(14):2208-2222. PubMed ID: 29682777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of phase I dose-finding designs in clinical trials with monotonicity assumption violation.
    Abbas R; Rossoni C; Jaki T; Paoletti X; Mozgunov P
    Clin Trials; 2020 Oct; 17(5):522-534. PubMed ID: 32631095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The 3 + 3 design in dose-finding studies with small sample sizes: Pitfalls and possible remedies.
    Chiuzan C; Dehbi HM
    Clin Trials; 2024 Jun; 21(3):350-357. PubMed ID: 38618916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of toxicity probability interval based designs in contrast to the continual reassessment method.
    Horton BJ; Wages NA; Conaway MR
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 27435150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy, Safety, and Reliability of Novel Phase I Trial Designs.
    Zhou H; Yuan Y; Nie L
    Clin Cancer Res; 2018 Sep; 24(18):4357-4364. PubMed ID: 29661774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Keyboard design for phase I drug-combination trials.
    Pan H; Lin R; Zhou Y; Yuan Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 May; 92():105972. PubMed ID: 32151751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Bayesian interval dose-finding design addressingOckham's razor: mTPI-2.
    Guo W; Wang SJ; Yang S; Lynn H; Ji Y
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2017 Jul; 58():23-33. PubMed ID: 28458054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the relative efficiency of model-assisted designs: a conditional approach.
    Lin R; Yuan Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(4):648-662. PubMed ID: 31258039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of model choices for the Continual Reassessment Method in phase I cancer trials.
    Paoletti X; Kramar A
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):3012-28. PubMed ID: 19672839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A default method to specify skeletons for Bayesian model averaging continual reassessment method for phase I clinical trials.
    Pan H; Yuan Y
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):266-279. PubMed ID: 26991076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials.
    Lin R; Yin G
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(26):4106-4120. PubMed ID: 28786138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practical model-based dose-finding in phase I clinical trials: methods based on toxicity.
    Thall PF; Lee SJ
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2003; 13(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 12801254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling adverse event counts in phase I clinical trials of a cytotoxic agent.
    Muenz DG; Braun TM; Taylor JM
    Clin Trials; 2018 Aug; 15(4):386-397. PubMed ID: 29779418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal phase I dose-escalation trial designs in oncology--a simulation study.
    Gerke O; Siedentop H
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5329-44. PubMed ID: 17849502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. np1: a computer program for dose escalation strategies in phase I clinical trials.
    Kramar A; Houédé N; Paoletti X
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Oct; 88(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 17719124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian Optimal Interval Design: A Simple and Well-Performing Design for Phase I Oncology Trials.
    Yuan Y; Hess KR; Hilsenbeck SG; Gilbert MR
    Clin Cancer Res; 2016 Sep; 22(17):4291-301. PubMed ID: 27407096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Posterior maximization and averaging for Bayesian working model choice in the continual reassessment method.
    Daimon T; Zohar S; O'Quigley J
    Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1563-73. PubMed ID: 21351288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revisiting isotonic phase I design in the era of model-assisted dose-finding.
    Wages NA; Conaway MR
    Clin Trials; 2018 Oct; 15(5):524-529. PubMed ID: 30101616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incorporating historical information to improve phase I clinical trials.
    Zhou Y; Lee JJ; Wang S; Bailey S; Yuan Y
    Pharm Stat; 2021 Nov; 20(6):1017-1034. PubMed ID: 33793044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Calibration of prior variance in the Bayesian continual reassessment method.
    Lee SM; Cheung YK
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(17):2081-9. PubMed ID: 21413054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.