108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29683103)
41. Functional results of Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implants in conductive and mixed hearing losses.
Bernardeschi D; Hoffman C; Benchaa T; Labassi S; Beliaeff M; Sterkers O; Grayeli AB
Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16(6):381-7. PubMed ID: 21228566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Piezoelectric round window osteoplasty for Vibrant Soundbridge implant.
Cuda D; Murri A; Tinelli N
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):782-6. PubMed ID: 19623098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T after cochlear implantation.
Crane BT; Gottschalk B; Kraut M; Aygun N; Niparko JK
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Oct; 31(8):1215-20. PubMed ID: 20729783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A longitudinal study on postoperative hearing thresholds with the Vibrant Soundbridge device.
Vincent C; Fraysse B; Lavieille JP; Truy E; Sterkers O; Vaneecloo FM
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Oct; 261(9):493-6. PubMed ID: 15004703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Loss of residual hearing after cochlear implantation.
Boggess WJ; Baker JE; Balkany TJ
Laryngoscope; 1989 Oct; 99(10 Pt 1):1002-5. PubMed ID: 2796546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Interaction between electric and acoustic cues in diotic condition for speech perception in quiet and noise by cochlear implantees.
Richard C; Ferrary E; Borel S; Sterkers O; Grayeli AB
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jan; 33(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 22158018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. MRI compatibility and safety of cochlear implants.
Tang Q; Li Y
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Mar; 37(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 22561502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Oval window membrane vibroplasty for direct acoustic cochlear stimulation: treating severe mixed hearing loss in challenging middle ears.
Schwab B; Salcher RB; Maier H; Kontorinis G
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):804-9. PubMed ID: 22699990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Middle ear implant for mixed hearing loss with malformation in a 9-year-old child.
Roman S; Nicollas R; Triglia JM
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2010 Mar; 127(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 20822749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Round window stimulation with the Vibrant Soundbridge: Comparison of direct and indirect coupling.
Olszewski L; Jedrzejczak WW; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski H
Laryngoscope; 2017 Dec; 127(12):2843-2849. PubMed ID: 28220497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Vibrant soundbridge versus conventional hearing aid in sensorineural high-frequency hearing loss: a prospective study.
Truy E; Philibert B; Vesson JF; Labassi S; Collet L
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):684-7. PubMed ID: 18434928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Rehabilitation of high frequency hearing loss: use of an active middle ear implant].
Böheim K; Nahler A; Schlögel M
HNO; 2007 Sep; 55(9):690-5. PubMed ID: 17160659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Round window application of an active middle ear implant (AMEI) system in congenital oval window atresia.
Zhao S; Gong S; Han D; Zhang H; Ma X; Li Y; Chen X; Ren R; Li Y
Acta Otolaryngol; 2016; 136(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 26493073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on a new electromagnetic implantable middle ear hearing device.
Hunyadi S; Werning JW; Lewin JS; Maniglia AJ
Am J Otol; 1997 May; 18(3):328-31. PubMed ID: 9149826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Functional outcomes of Vibrant Soundbridge applied on the middle ear windows in comparison with conventional hearing aids.
Gunduz B; Atas A; Bayazıt YA; Goksu N; Gokdogan C; Tutar H
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Dec; 132(12):1306-10. PubMed ID: 23039370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Vibrant Soundbridge rehabilitation of sensorineural hearing loss.
Khan A; Hillman T; Chen D
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2014 Dec; 47(6):927-39. PubMed ID: 25301506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Vibrant Soundbridge surgery in patients with severe external otitis: complications of a transcanal approach.
Zwartenkot JW; Mulder JJ; Snik AF; Cremers CW
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Apr; 32(3):398-402. PubMed ID: 21307813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Cochlear implant magnet displacement during magnetic resonance imaging.
Deneuve S; Loundon N; Leboulanger N; Rouillon I; Garabedian EN
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Sep; 29(6):789-190. PubMed ID: 18667941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Is the Bone-Conduction HeadBand test useful for predicting the functional outcome of a round window active middle ear implant?
Monini S; Filippi C; Atturo F; Barbara M
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1329-35. PubMed ID: 23867342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
