These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29683558)

  • 21. Quantification of the Effect of Pressure Wire Drift on the Diagnostic Performance of Fractional Flow Reserve, Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio, and Whole-Cycle Pd/Pa.
    Cook CM; Ahmad Y; Shun-Shin MJ; Nijjer S; Petraco R; Al-Lamee R; Mayet J; Francis DP; Sen S; Davies JE
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 9(4):e002988. PubMed ID: 27076571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficacy of pressure parameters obtained during contrast medium-induced submaximal hyperemia in the functional assessment of intermediate coronary stenosis in comparison with instantaneous wave-free ratio.
    Kanaji Y; Murai T; Lee T; Matsuda J; Usui E; Araki M; Niida T; Ichijyo S; Hamaya R; Yonetsu T; Kimura S; Kakuta T
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 208():128-36. PubMed ID: 26851699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validation of the "smart" minimum FFR Algorithm in an unselected all comer population of patients with intermediate coronary stenoses.
    Hennigan B; Johnson N; McClure J; Corcoran D; Watkins S; Berry C; Oldroyd KG
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 33(7):991-997. PubMed ID: 28357726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contrast FFR plus intracoronary injection of nitro-glycerine accurately predicts FFR for coronary stenosis functional assessment.
    Gutiérrez-Barrios A; Noval-Morillas I; Camacho-Freire S; Puche JE; Gheorghe L; Silva E; Alarcon-Lastra I; Cañadas-Pruaño D; Gómez-Menchero A; Calle-Pérez G; Diaz-Fernandez JF; Vázquez-García R
    Minerva Cardiol Angiol; 2021 Aug; 69(4):449-457. PubMed ID: 33258564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Relationship between adenosine A2a receptor polymorphism rs5751876 and fractional flow reserve during percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Nardin M; Verdoia M; Negro F; Suryapranata H; Khedi E; De Luca G
    Heart Vessels; 2020 Oct; 35(10):1349-1359. PubMed ID: 32367186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Observations from a real-time, iFR-FFR "hybrid approach" in patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease undergoing TAVI.
    Scarsini R; Pesarini G; Lunardi M; Piccoli A; Zanetti C; Cantone R; Bellamoli M; Ferrero V; Gottin L; Faggian G; Ribichini F
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018; 19(3 Pt B):355-359. PubMed ID: 29113864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ACIST-FFR Study (Assessment of Catheter-Based Interrogation and Standard Techniques for Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement).
    Fearon WF; Chambers JW; Seto AH; Sarembock IJ; Raveendran G; Sakarovitch C; Yang L; Desai M; Jeremias A; Price MJ;
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 10(12):e005905. PubMed ID: 29246917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multicenter core laboratory comparison of the instantaneous wave-free ratio and resting Pd/Pa with fractional flow reserve: the RESOLVE study.
    Jeremias A; Maehara A; Généreux P; Asrress KN; Berry C; De Bruyne B; Davies JE; Escaned J; Fearon WF; Gould KL; Johnson NP; Kirtane AJ; Koo BK; Marques KM; Nijjer S; Oldroyd KG; Petraco R; Piek JJ; Pijls NH; Redwood S; Siebes M; Spaan JAE; van 't Veer M; Mintz GS; Stone GW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Apr; 63(13):1253-1261. PubMed ID: 24211503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of Resting Non-hyperemic Indices for Avoidance of Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement: The Goal of 100% Accuracy.
    Ammar KA; Kazmi SS; Ahmad MN; Ahmad MM; Riaz A; Husain I; Husain F; Allaqaband S; Bajwa T; Gupta A
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2016 Jul; 28(7):265-70. PubMed ID: 27342202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pressure wire versus microcatheter for FFR measurement: a head-to-head comparison.
    Pouillot C; Fournier S; Glasenapp J; Rambaud G; Bougrini K; Vi Fane R; Geyer C; Adjedj J
    EuroIntervention; 2018 Feb; 13(15):e1850-e1856. PubMed ID: 28804057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of increasing dose of intracoronary adenosine on peak hyperemia duration during fractional flow reserve assessment.
    Verdoia M; Erbetta R; Sagazio E; Barbieri L; Negro F; Suryapranata H; Kedhi E; De Luca G;
    Int J Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 284():16-21. PubMed ID: 30293665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation and comparison of non-hyperemic pressure reserve to fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary artery stenosis: A real world study.
    Aoun J; Lahsaei S; Zahm C; Bhat T; Carrozza JP
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 93(2):250-255. PubMed ID: 30269422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Age-related changes in the coronary microcirculation influencing the diagnostic performance of invasive pressure-based indices and long-term patient prognosis.
    Faria D; Mejia-Renteria H; Lee JM; Lee SH; Travieso A; Jung JH; Doh JH; Nam CW; Shin ES; Hoshino M; Sugiyama T; Kanaji Y; Gonzalo N; Kakuta T; Koo BK; Escaned J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Dec; 100(7):1195-1205. PubMed ID: 36273417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prognostic Value of Resting Distal-to-Aortic Coronary Pressure in Clinical Practice.
    Ahn JM; Park DW; Kim SO; Kang DY; Lee CH; Lee PH; Lee SW; Park SW; Park SJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 May; 13(5):e007868. PubMed ID: 32345039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reactive myocardial hyperaemia for functional assessment of coronary stenosis severity.
    Stoller M; Seiler C
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Jun; 13(2):e201-e209. PubMed ID: 27993753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Similarity and Difference of Resting Distal to Aortic Coronary Pressure and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio.
    Lee JM; Park J; Hwang D; Kim CH; Choi KH; Rhee TM; Tong Y; Park JJ; Shin ES; Nam CW; Doh JH; Koo BK
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 70(17):2114-2123. PubMed ID: 29050558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Adenosine-Free Indexes vs. Fractional Flow Reserve for Functional Assessment of Coronary Stenoses: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Leone AM; Campo G; Gallo F; Pavasini R; Basile E; D'Amario D; Tebaldi M; Biscaglia S; Maietti E; Trani C; Crea F
    Int J Cardiol; 2020 Jan; 299():93-99. PubMed ID: 31378379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Maximal hyperemia in the assessment of fractional flow reserve: intracoronary adenosine versus intracoronary sodium nitroprusside versus intravenous adenosine: the NASCI (Nitroprussiato versus Adenosina nelle Stenosi Coronariche Intermedie) study.
    Leone AM; Porto I; De Caterina AR; Basile E; Aurelio A; Gardi A; Russo D; Laezza D; Niccoli G; Burzotta F; Trani C; Mazzari MA; Mongiardo R; Rebuzzi AG; Crea F
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 5(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 22516396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. VERIFY (VERification of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity in EverydaY Practice): a multicenter study in consecutive patients.
    Berry C; van 't Veer M; Witt N; Kala P; Bocek O; Pyxaras SA; McClure JD; Fearon WF; Barbato E; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH; Oldroyd KG
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 61(13):1421-7. PubMed ID: 23395076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of invasively measured FFR with FFR derived from coronary CT angiography for detection of lesion-specific ischemia: Results from a PC-based prototype algorithm.
    Röther J; Moshage M; Dey D; Schwemmer C; Tröbs M; Blachutzik F; Achenbach S; Schlundt C; Marwan M
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(2):101-107. PubMed ID: 29409717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.