These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29683694)

  • 1. Stimulus similarity affects patterning discrimination learning.
    George DN
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(2):128-148. PubMed ID: 29683694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When patterning discriminations are harder than biconditional ones: A cue constellation approach.
    Whitlow JW; Loatman PA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):354-70. PubMed ID: 26147603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multimodal discrimination learning in humans: evidence for configural theory.
    Redhead ES
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Nov; 60(11):1477-95. PubMed ID: 17853209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Convergent results in eyeblink conditioning and contingency learning in humans: addition of a common cue does not affect feature-negative discriminations.
    Thorwart A; Glautier S; Lachnit H
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Oct; 85(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 20638441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the representation of novel stimuli in patterning and irrelevant cue discriminations.
    Whitlow JW
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(3):322-339. PubMed ID: 29847984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model.
    Pearce JM
    Psychol Rev; 1994 Oct; 101(4):587-607. PubMed ID: 7984708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flexible Configural Learning of Non-Linear Discriminations and Detection of Stimulus Compounds.
    Glautier S; Menneer T; Godwin HJ; Donnelly N; Aristizabal JA
    Exp Psychol; 2016 Jul; 63(4):215-236. PubMed ID: 27750517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cue competition influences biconditional discrimination.
    Byrom NC; Murphy RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):182-192. PubMed ID: 28764580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "Stimulus generalization" between differentiated visual, auditory, and central stimuli.
    John ER; Kleinman D
    J Neurophysiol; 1975 Jul; 38(4):1015-34. PubMed ID: 1159461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing patterning and biconditional discriminations in humans.
    Harris JA; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Jan; 34(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 18248121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intermodal transfer from a visual to an auditory discrimination using an errorless learning procedure.
    Arantes J; Berg ME
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 19429224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Symmetrical generalization decrements: configural stimulus processing in human contingency learning.
    Thorwart A; Lachnit H
    Learn Behav; 2009 Feb; 37(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 19122057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual Aversive Learning Compromises Sensory Discrimination.
    Shalev L; Paz R; Avidan G
    J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(11):2766-2779. PubMed ID: 29439168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of age on associative and rule-based causal learning and generalization.
    Mutter SA; Plumlee LF
    Psychol Aging; 2014 Jun; 29(2):173-86. PubMed ID: 24955988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Summation effects in human learning: evidence from patterning discriminations in goal-tracking.
    Thorwart A; Uengoer M; Livesey EJ; Harris JA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1366-1379. PubMed ID: 27126385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Elemental representations of stimuli in associative learning.
    Harris JA
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Jul; 113(3):584-605. PubMed ID: 16802882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Crossmodal attention switching: auditory dominance in temporal discrimination tasks.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():139-46. PubMed ID: 25463554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing elemental and configural associative theories in human causal learning: a case for attention.
    Lachnit H; Schultheis H; König S; Ungör M; Melchers K
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):303-13. PubMed ID: 18426312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory motion affects visual motion perception in a speeded discrimination task.
    Sanabria D; Lupiáñez J; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Apr; 178(3):415-21. PubMed ID: 17372657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attention and entrainment: P3b varies as a function of temporal predictability.
    Schmidt-Kassow M; Schubotz RI; Kotz SA
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 18987559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.