These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29683696)

  • 1. The paradoxical effect of low reward probabilities in suboptimal choice.
    Fortes I; Pinto C; Machado A; Vasconcelos M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(2):180-193. PubMed ID: 29683696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing the boundaries of "paradoxical" predictions: Pigeons do disregard bad news.
    Fortes I; Vasconcelos M; Machado A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(4):336-346. PubMed ID: 27598063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for a magnitude effect in probability discounting with pigeons.
    Grace RC; McLean AP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 26301612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Suboptimal Choice in Pigeons: Stimulus Value Predicts Choice over Frequencies.
    Smith AP; Bailey AR; Chow JJ; Beckmann JS; Zentall TR
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159336. PubMed ID: 27441394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do pigeons (Columba livia) use information about the absence of food appropriately? A further look into suboptimal choice.
    Fortes I; Machado A; Vasconcelos M
    J Comp Psychol; 2017 Nov; 131(4):277-289. PubMed ID: 28481567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
    Smith AP; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of outcome delay on suboptimal choice.
    McDevitt MA; Pisklak JM; Spetch M; Dunn R
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():279-285. PubMed ID: 30394293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rats' optimal choice behavior in a gambling-like task.
    Orduña V; Alba R
    Behav Processes; 2019 May; 162():104-111. PubMed ID: 30742885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An associability decay model of paradoxical choice.
    Daniels CW; Sanabria F
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(3):258-271. PubMed ID: 29985043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relative value of two options for pigeons depends on their context.
    Pinto C; Fortes I; Wilson AG; Zentall TR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Jan; 105(1):176-83. PubMed ID: 26781055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discriminative stimuli that follow the absence of reinforcement are preferred by pigeons over those that follow reinforcement.
    Friedrich AM; Clement TS; Zentall TR
    Learn Behav; 2005 Aug; 33(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 16396080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Paradoxical choice in rats: Subjective valuation and mechanism of choice.
    Ojeda A; Murphy RA; Kacelnik A
    Behav Processes; 2018 Jul; 152():73-80. PubMed ID: 29608942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suboptimal choice, reward-predictive signals, and temporal information.
    Cunningham PJ; Shahan TA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Jan; 44(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 29323515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rats engage in suboptimal choice when the delay to food is sufficiently long.
    Cunningham PJ; Shahan TA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jul; 45(3):301-310. PubMed ID: 31070433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Δ-∑ hypothesis: How contrast and reinforcement rate combine to generate suboptimal choice.
    González VV; Macías A; Machado A; Vasconcelos M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 May; 113(3):591-608. PubMed ID: 32237091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time, uncertainty, and suboptimal choice.
    Macías A; González VV; Machado A; Vasconcelos M
    Behav Processes; 2024 Jan; 214():104982. PubMed ID: 38072037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Within-trial contrast or Wagner's SOP model: Can they both account for two presumed complex cognitive phenomena?
    Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):235-242. PubMed ID: 32730081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When is a choice not a choice? Pigeons fail to inhibit incorrect responses on a go/no-go midsession reversal task.
    McMillan N; Sturdy CB; Spetch ML
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 25915749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Delays to food-predictive stimuli do not affect suboptimal choice in rats.
    Cunningham PJ; Shahan TA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(4):385-397. PubMed ID: 32352802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When good news leads to bad choices.
    McDevitt MA; Dunn RM; Spetch ML; Ludvig EA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Jan; 105(1):23-40. PubMed ID: 26781050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.