These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29683705)

  • 1. The motor locus of no-go backward crosstalk.
    Durst M; Janczyk M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1931-1946. PubMed ID: 29683705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying the locus of compatibility-based backward crosstalk: Evidence from an extended PRP paradigm.
    Janczyk M; Renas S; Durst M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Feb; 44(2):261-276. PubMed ID: 28557494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two types of backward crosstalk: Sequential modulations and evidence from the diffusion model.
    Durst M; Janczyk M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():132-152. PubMed ID: 30639985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal aspects of two types of backward crosstalk in dual-tasks: An analysis of continuous mouse-tracking data.
    Schonard C; Ulrich R; Janczyk M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Sep; 76(9):2068-2083. PubMed ID: 36255305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. S1-R2 and R1-R2 Backward Crosstalk Both Affect the Central Processing Stage.
    Koob V; Durst M; Bratzke D; Ulrich R; Janczyk M
    J Cogn; 2020 Oct; 3(1):37. PubMed ID: 33103051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PRP training shows Task1 response selection is the locus of the backward response compatibility effect.
    Thomson SJ; Danis LK; Watter S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Feb; 22(1):212-8. PubMed ID: 24845877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of a no-go Task 2 on Task 1 performance in dual - tasking: From benefits to costs.
    Janczyk M; Huestegge L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Apr; 79(3):796-806. PubMed ID: 28028775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Item-specific proportion congruency (ISPC) modulates, but does not generate, the backward crosstalk effect.
    Thomson SJ; Simone AC; Watter S
    Psychol Res; 2021 Apr; 85(3):1093-1107. PubMed ID: 32222869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Smaller backward crosstalk effects for free choice tasks are not the result of immediate conflict adaptation.
    Naefgen C; Janczyk M
    Cogn Process; 2019 Feb; 20(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 30306368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual-task backward compatibility effects are episodically mediated.
    Giammarco M; Thomson SJ; Watter S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):520-41. PubMed ID: 26572914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sequential modulation of backward crosstalk and task-shielding in dual-tasking.
    Janczyk M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 May; 42(5):631-47. PubMed ID: 26594880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two types of between-task conflict trigger respective processing adjustments within one dual-task.
    Mahesan D; Janczyk M; Fischer R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Nov; 221():103450. PubMed ID: 34823209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parallel dual-task processing and task-shielding in older and younger adults: Behavioral and diffusion model results.
    Janczyk M; Mittelstädt P; Wienrich's C
    Exp Aging Res; 2018; 44(2):95-116. PubMed ID: 29336726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Locus of backward crosstalk effects on task 1 in a psychological refractory period task.
    Ko YT; Miller J
    Exp Psychol; 2014 Jan; 61(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 23948390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. To prepare or not to prepare? When preparation of a response in Task 2 induces extra performance costs in Task 1.
    Durst M; Ulrich R; Janczyk M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):654-660. PubMed ID: 30887448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychophysiological measurement of backward response activation in the prioritized processing paradigm.
    Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 May; 43(5):941-953. PubMed ID: 28252986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Larger between-task crosstalk in children than in adults: Behavioral results from the backward crosstalk paradigm and a diffusion model analysis.
    Janczyk M; Büschelberger J; Herbort O
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Mar; 155():95-112. PubMed ID: 27992773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Backward crosstalk and the role of dimensional overlap within and between tasks.
    Huestegge L; Pieczykolan A; Janczyk M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():139-147. PubMed ID: 29933176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling response- from goal-conflict in dual-task performance.
    Janczyk M; Pfister R; Hommel B; Kunde W
    Cognition; 2014 Jul; 132(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 24747873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.