240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29683706)
1. A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of frequency trajectory.
Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ; Raoul A; Kaye M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 29683706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2.
Brysbaert M; Stevens M; Mandera P; Keuleers E
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Mar; 42(3):441-58. PubMed ID: 26501839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does frequency trajectory influence word identification? A cross-task comparison.
Lété B; Bonin P
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):973-1000. PubMed ID: 23030693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience.
Juhasz BJ; Lai YH; Woodcock ML
Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1004-1019. PubMed ID: 25361864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The British Lexicon Project: lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words.
Keuleers E; Lacey P; Rastle K; Brysbaert M
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Mar; 44(1):287-304. PubMed ID: 21720920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms?
Brysbaert M; Cortese MJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):545-59. PubMed ID: 20700859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A word or two about nonwords: Frequency, semantic neighborhood density, and orthography-to-semantics consistency effects for nonwords in the lexical decision task.
Hendrix P; Sun CC
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):157-183. PubMed ID: 31999159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of age and word frequency on Korean visual word recognition: Evidence from a web-based large-scale lexical-decision task.
Baek H; Gordon PC; Choi W
Psychol Aging; 2024 May; 39(3):231-244. PubMed ID: 38236269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project.
Yap MJ; Sibley DE; Balota DA; Ratcliff R; Rueckl J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):597-613. PubMed ID: 25329078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Orthographic and root frequency effects in Arabic: Evidence from eye movements and lexical decision.
Hermena EW; Liversedge SP; Bouamama S; Drieghe D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):934-954. PubMed ID: 30247050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words.
Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ
Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):160-8. PubMed ID: 22936106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The French Lexicon Project: lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords.
Ferrand L; New B; Brysbaert M; Keuleers E; Bonin P; Méot A; Augustinova M; Pallier C
Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):488-96. PubMed ID: 20479180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Calgary semantic decision project: concrete/abstract decision data for 10,000 English words.
Pexman PM; Heard A; Lloyd E; Yap MJ
Behav Res Methods; 2017 Apr; 49(2):407-417. PubMed ID: 26944579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.
Schmidtke D; Matsuki K; Kuperman V
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1793-1820. PubMed ID: 28447810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task preferable to the yes/no task with developing readers?
Moret-Tatay C; Perea M
J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Sep; 110(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 21565360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of low-spatial frequencies in lexical decision and masked priming.
Boden C; Giaschi D
Brain Cogn; 2009 Apr; 69(3):580-91. PubMed ID: 19168272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SUBTLEX-UK: a new and improved word frequency database for British English.
van Heuven WJ; Mandera P; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1176-90. PubMed ID: 24417251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Compound reading in German: Effects of constituent frequency and whole-word frequency in children and adults.
Hasenäcker J; Schroeder S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):920-933. PubMed ID: 30024261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: an analysis of 2,342 words.
Cortese MJ; Khanna MM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Aug; 60(8):1072-82. PubMed ID: 17654392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
