These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29685209)

  • 21. Classification and labeling of industrial products with extreme pH by making use of in vitro methods for the assessment of skin and eye irritation and corrosion in a weight of evidence approach.
    Scheel J; Heppenheimer A; Lehringer E; Kreutz J; Poth A; Ammann H; Reisinger K; Banduhn N
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Oct; 25(7):1435-47. PubMed ID: 21550395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. IRAG working group 1. Organotypic models for the assessment/prediction of ocular irritation. Interagency Regulatory Alternatives Group.
    Chamberlain M; Gad SC; Gautheron P; Prinsen MK
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1997 Jan; 35(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 9100813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. IRAG working group 6. Guidelines for the evaluation of eye irritation alternative tests: criteria for data submission. Interagency Regulatory Alternatives Group.
    Scala RA; Springer J
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1997 Jan; 35(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 9100812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vitro tests within the REACH information strategies.
    Louekari K; Sihvonen K; Kuittinen M; Sømnes V
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Aug; 34(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 16945005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bridging the gap between regulatory acceptance and industry use of non-animal methods.
    Clippinger AJ; Hill E; Curren R; Bishop P
    ALTEX; 2016; 33(4):453-458. PubMed ID: 27254273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Human hemoglobin denaturation as an alternative to the Draize test for predicting eye irritancy of surfactants.
    Mitjans M; Infante MR; Vinardell MP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Nov; 52(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 18602964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ocular safety: a silent (in vitro) success story.
    Curren RD; Harbell JW
    Altern Lab Anim; 2002 Dec; 30 Suppl 2():69-74. PubMed ID: 12513653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. CON4EI: Evaluation of QSAR models for hazard identification and labelling of eye irritating chemicals.
    Geerts L; Adriaens E; Alépée N; Guest R; Willoughby JA; Kandarova H; Drzewiecka A; Fochtman P; Verstraelen S; Van Rompay AR
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Jun; 49():90-98. PubMed ID: 28941583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Alternative methods for the replacement of eye irritation testing.
    Lotz C; Schmid FF; Rossi A; Kurdyn S; Kampik D; De Wever B; Walles H; Groeber FK
    ALTEX; 2016; 33(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 26626125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perspectives on alternatives to the eye irritation test: industry, public interest, government.
    Bruner LH; Spira H; Balls M; Hill RN
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1997 Jan; 35(1):165-6. PubMed ID: 9100819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Recent progress in the eye irritation test.
    Chu IH; Toft P
    Toxicol Ind Health; 1993; 9(6):1017-25. PubMed ID: 8191500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Refinement of the Slug Mucosal Irritation test as an alternative screening test for eye irritation.
    Adriaens E; Dhondt MM; Remon JP
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2005 Feb; 19(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 15582359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of low volume, draize and in vitro eye irritation test data. II. Oil/water emulsions.
    Gettings SD; Lordo RA; Feder PI; Hintze KL
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1998 Jan; 36(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 9487363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prediction of ocular irritancy of 26 chemicals and 26 cosmetic products with isolated rabbit eye (IRE) test.
    Guo X; Yang XF; Yang Y; Hans R; Cai JH; Xue JY; Tan XH; Xie XP; Xiong XK; Huang JM
    Biomed Environ Sci; 2012 Jun; 25(3):359-66. PubMed ID: 22840588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Study on the use of haemoglobin denaturation test as an alternative to Draize eye irritation test].
    Liao Y; Wang X; Zhang LS; Li GM; Zhang BX
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Sep; 35(5):654-7. PubMed ID: 15460411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Eye irritation potential: usefulness of the HET-CAM under the Globally Harmonized System of classification and labeling of chemicals (GHS).
    Scheel J; Kleber M; Kreutz J; Lehringer E; Mehling A; Reisinger K; Steiling W
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Apr; 59(3):471-92. PubMed ID: 21310206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A three-tier QSAR modeling strategy for estimating eye irritation potential of diverse chemicals in rabbit for regulatory purposes.
    Basant N; Gupta S; Singh KP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():282-91. PubMed ID: 27018829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Porcine Corneal Ocular Reversibility Assay (PorCORA) predicts ocular damage and recovery for global regulatory agency hazard categories.
    Piehl M; Carathers M; Soda R; Cerven D; DeGeorge G
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Dec; 25(8):1912-8. PubMed ID: 21708243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Isolated Chicken Eye test to replace the Draize test in rabbits.
    Prinsen MK; Hendriksen CFM; Krul CAM; Woutersen RA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Apr; 85():132-149. PubMed ID: 28192172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prediction models for eye irritation potential based on endpoints of the HETCAM and neutral red uptake tests.
    Worth AP; Cronin MT
    In Vitr Mol Toxicol; 2001; 14(3):143-56. PubMed ID: 11846988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.