These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29685306)

  • 1. A new method for the recovery and evidential comparison of footwear impressions using 3D structured light scanning.
    Thompson TJU; Norris P
    Sci Justice; 2018 May; 58(3):237-243. PubMed ID: 29685306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the quality of footwear marks recovered from simulated graves.
    Stephens M; Errickson D; Giles SB; Ringrose TJ
    Sci Justice; 2020 Nov; 60(6):512-521. PubMed ID: 33077034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technical note: The Next Step - a semi-automatic coding and comparison system for forensic footwear impressions.
    Daniel O; Levi A; Pertsev R; Issan Y; Pasternak Z; Cohen A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Aug; 337():111378. PubMed ID: 35839684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing footwear impressions that are close non-matches using correlation-based approaches.
    Venkatasubramanian G; Hegde V; Padi S; Iyer H; Herman M
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 May; 66(3):890-909. PubMed ID: 33682930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of non-contact scanning to forensic podiatry: A feasibility study.
    Crowther M; Reidy S; Walker J; Islam M; Thompson T
    Sci Justice; 2021 Jan; 61(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 33357830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recovery of 3D footwear impressions using a range of different techniques.
    Larsen HJ; Bennett MR
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 May; 66(3):1056-1064. PubMed ID: 33394502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A metric study of insole foot impressions in footwear of identical twins.
    Nirenberg MS; Krishan K; Kanchan T
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Nov; 52():116-121. PubMed ID: 28918370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of Various Fixatives for Casting Footwear Impressions in Sand at Crime Scenes.
    Battiest T; Clutter SW; McGill D
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 May; 61(3):782-6. PubMed ID: 27122420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Empirical Evaluation of the Reliability of Photogrammetry Software in the Recovery of Three-Dimensional Footwear Impressions.
    Larsen HJ; Bennett MR
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Sep; 65(5):1722-1729. PubMed ID: 32407555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simulated crime scene footwear impression database for teaching and research purposes.
    Lin ET; DeBat T; Speir JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(2):726-734. PubMed ID: 34750820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Casting of 3-dimensional footwear prints in snow with foam blocks.
    Petraco N; Sherman H; Dumitra A; Roberts M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jun; 263():147-151. PubMed ID: 27124876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 3D documentation of footwear impressions and tyre tracks in snow with high resolution optical surface scanning.
    Buck U; Albertini N; Naether S; Thali MJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Sep; 171(2-3):157-64. PubMed ID: 17161568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The application of TreadMatch scans to aid the process of footwear mark comparison.
    Reel S; Harris R; Reidy S; Chambers J
    Sci Justice; 2022 Sep; 62(5):530-539. PubMed ID: 36336446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Collection of Wet-Origin Footwear Impressions on Various Surfaces Using an Electrostatic Dust Print Lifter.
    Hong S; Park M
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Sep; 63(5):1516-1520. PubMed ID: 29351360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimate of the random match frequency of acquired characteristics in footwear: Part I - Impressions in blood.
    Smale AN; Speir JA
    Sci Justice; 2024 Jan; 64(1):117-133. PubMed ID: 38182307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation and comparison of the electrostatic dust print lifter and the electrostatic detection apparatus on the development of footwear impressions on paper.
    Craig CL; Hornsby BM; Riles M
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jul; 51(4):819-26. PubMed ID: 16882226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of enhancement techniques for footwear impressions on dark and patterned fabrics.
    Farrugia KJ; Bandey H; Dawson L; Daéid NN
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1472-85. PubMed ID: 23786301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lifting bloody footwear impressions using alginate casts followed by chemical enhancement.
    Wiesner S; Izraeli E; Shor Y; Domb A
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 May; 58(3):782-8. PubMed ID: 23488772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ShoeCase: A data set of mock crime scene footwear impressions.
    Tibben A; McGuire M; Renfro S; Carriquiry A
    Data Brief; 2023 Oct; 50():109546. PubMed ID: 37780466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technological innovation in the recovery and analysis of 3D forensic footwear evidence: Structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry.
    Larsen H; Budka M; Bennett MR
    Sci Justice; 2021 Jul; 61(4):356-368. PubMed ID: 34172124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.